Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 889–903 | Cite as

Innovations in science education: infusing social emotional principles into early STEM learning

  • Pamela W. Garner
  • Nuria Gabitova
  • Anuradha Gupta
  • Thomas Wood
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

We report on the development of an after-school and summer-based science, technology, engineering, and mathematics curriculum infused with the arts and social emotional learning content (STEAM SEL). Its design was motivated by theory and research that suggest that STEM education is well-suited for teaching empathy and other emotion-related skills. In this paper, we describe the activities associated with the development and design of the program and the curriculum. We provide expert-ratings of the STEAM and social emotional elements of the program and present instructor and participant feedback about the program’s content and its delivery. Our results revealed that infusing the arts and social emotional learning content into science education created a holistic STEM-related curriculum that holds potential for enhancing young children’s interest in and appreciation for science and its applications. The data also suggested that the program was well-developed and, generally well-executed. However, experts rated the STEAM elements of the program more positively than the SEL elements, especially with regard to sequencing of lessons and integration among the lessons and hands-on activities, indicating that program revisions are warranted.

Keywords

Science education Social emotional learning STEM education Twenty-first century skills 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amadei, B., & Sandekian, R. (2010). Model of integrating humanitarian development into engineering education. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 136, 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armstrong, T. (2012). Neurodiversity in the classroom: Strength-based strategies to help students with special needs succeed in school and life. Alexandria: American Society for Counseling and Development.Google Scholar
  4. Beckett, M., Hawken, A., & Jacknowitz, A. (2001). Accountability for after school care: Devising standards and measuring adherence to them. Los Angeles, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
  5. Ben-Avie, M., Haynes, N. M., Ensign, J., & Steinfeld, T. (2003). Social and emotional development in relation to math and science learning: An introduction to the argument. In N. Haynes, M. Ben-Avie, & J. Ensign (Eds.), How social and emotional development add up: Getting results in math and science education (pp. 1–9). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  6. Breitkreuz, K., & Songer, T. (2015). The emerging 360 degree model for global citizenship education. The International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement, 3(1).Google Scholar
  7. Broughton, S. H., Sinatra, G. M., & Nussbaum, E. M. (2013). “Pluto has been a planet my whole Life!” Emotions, attitudes, and conceptual change in elementary students’ learning about Pluto’s reclassification. Research in Science Education, 43, 529–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Burt, M., Resnick, G., & Novick, E. (1998). Building supportive communities for at-risk adolescents. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  9. Castano, C. (2012). Fostering compassionate attitudes and the amelioration of aggression through a science class. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 961–986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christidou, V. (2011). Iinterset, attitudes and images related to science: Combining students’ voices with the voices of school science, teachers, and popular science. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 6, 141–159.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, D. (2008). Learning to make choices for the future connecting public lands, schools and communities through place-based learning and civic engagement. Woodstock, VT: Center for Place-based Learning and Community Engagement.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, R. (2004). Interaction ritual chains. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De Fruyt, F., Wille, B., & John, O. (2015). Employability in the 21st century: Complex (interactive) problem-solving and other essential skills. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8, 276–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeJarnette, N. (2012). America’s children: Providing early exposure to STEM (science, technology, engineering and math) initiatives. Education, 133, 77–84.Google Scholar
  15. Douglas, O., Burton, K. S., & Reese-Durham, N. (2008). The effects of the multiple intelligence teaching strategy on the academic achievement of eighth grade math students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 35, 182–187.Google Scholar
  16. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R., Dymnicki, A., Taylor, R., & Schellinger, K. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dusenbury, L., Zadrazil, J., Mart, A., & Weissberg, R. (2011). State learning standards to advance social and emotional learning. Chicago: CASE.Google Scholar
  18. Ee, J., Zhou, M., & Wong, I. (2014). Teachers’ infusion of social emotional learning. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 2, 27–45.Google Scholar
  19. Elias, M. J. (2009). Social-emotional and character development and academics as a dual focus of educational policy. Educational Policy, 23, 831–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elias, M. J., Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R., Frey, K., Greenberg, M., Haynes, N., et al. (1997). Promoting social and emotional learning: Guidelines for educators. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  21. Evans, M., Lomax, P., & Morgan, H. (2000). Closing the circle: Action research partnerships towards better learning and teaching in schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30, 405–419. doi: 10.1080/713657160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fleer, M. (2013). Affective imagination in science education: Determining the emotional nature of scientific and technological learning of young children. Research in Science Education, 43, 2085–2106. doi: 10.1007/s11165-012-9344-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fusarelli, L. (2004). The potential impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on equity and diversity in American education. Educational Policy, 18, 71–94. doi: 10.1177/0895904803260025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. George, P. S. (2005). A rationale for differentiating instruction in the regular classroom. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 185–193. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4403_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grace, M. M., & Ratcliffe, M. (2002). The science and values that young people draw upon to make decisions about biological conservation issues. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1157–1169. doi: 10.1080/09500690210134848.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Greenberg, M. T., Weissberg, R., O’Brien, M., Zins, J., Fredericks, L., Resnik, H., et al. (2003). Enhancing school-based prevention and youth development through coordinated social, emotional, and academic learning. American Psychologist, 58, 466–474. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.58.6-7.466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gueldner, B. A., & Feuerborn, L. (2016). Integrating mindfulness-based practices into social and emotional learning: A case application. Mindfulness, 7, 164–175. doi: 10.1007/s12671-015-0423-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Halberstadt, A. G., Denham, S. A., & Dunsmore, J. C. (2001). Affective social competence. Social Development, 10, 79–119. doi: 10.1111/1467-9507.00150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hart, E., & Bond, M. (1996). Making sense of action research through the use of a typology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 23, 152–159. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb03147.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Huang, Y., & Healy, C. (1997). The relations of Holland-typed majors to students’ freshman and senior work values. Research in Higher Education, 38, 455–477. doi: 10.1023/A:1024914610562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ibrahim, T. (2005). Global citizenship education: Mainstreaming the curriculum? Cambridge Journal of Education, 35, 177–194. doi: 10.1080/03057640500146823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Izard, C. E. (2009). Emotion theory and research: Highlights, unanswered questions, and emerging issues. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 1–25. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 463–481. doi: 10.1348/000709909X402811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kayumova, S., & Tippins, D. (2016). Toward re-thinking science education in terms of affective practices: Reflections from the field. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11422-015-9695-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2005). Communicative action and the public sphere. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 559–603). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Knecht-Sabres, L. (2013). Experiential learning in occupational therapy can it enhance readiness for clinical practice? Journal of Experiential Education, 36, 22–36. doi: 10.1177/1053825913481584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Kwah, H., Milne, C., Tsai, T., Goldman, R., & Plass, J. (2016). Emotional engagement, social interactions, and the development of an afterschool game design curriculum. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11, 713–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. LeDoux, J. (1997). The emotional brain. New York, NY: Putnam.Google Scholar
  40. Lee, H., Chang, H., Choi, K., Kim, S., & Zeidler, D. (2012). Developing character and values for global citizens: Analysis of pre-service science teachers’ moral reasoning on socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Science Education, 34, 925–953. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.625505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lepper, M., Corpus, J., & Iyengar, S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Education and Psychology, 97, 184–196. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levykh, M. G. (2008). The affective establishment and maintenance of Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development. Educational Theory, 58(1), 83–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2007.00277.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKernan, J. (2013). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Milne, C., & Otieno, T. (2007). Understanding engagement: Science demonstrations and emotional energy. Science Education, 91, 523–553. doi: 10.1002/sce.20203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Milner, A., Sondergeld, T., Demir, A., Johnson, C., & Czerniak, C. (2012). Elementary teachers’ beliefs about teaching science and classroom practice: An examination of pre/post NCLB testing in science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23, 111–132. doi: 10.1007/s10972-011-9230-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mohr-Schroeder, M., Jackson, C., Miller, M., Walcott, B., Little, D., Speler, L., et al. (2014). Developing middle school students’ interests in STEM via summer learning experiences: See Blue STEM camp. School Science and Mathematics, 114, 291–301. doi: 10.1111/ssm.12079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Newhouse, N. (1990). Implications of attitude and behavior research for environmental conservation. Journal of Environmental Education, 22, 26–32. doi: 10.1080/00958964.1990.9943043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Next Generation Science Standards Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  49. Pekrun, R., Elliot, A., & Maier, M. (2009). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: Testing a model of their joint relations with academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 115–135. doi: 10.1037/a0013383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pellegrino, J., & Hilton, M. (Eds.). (2013). Education for life and work: Developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  51. Porter, A., McMaken, J., Hwang, J., & Yang, R. (2011). Common core standards the new US intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40, 103–116. doi: 10.3102/0013189X11405038.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Powers, A. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. Journal of Environmental Education, 35, 17–31. doi: 10.3200/JOEE.35.4.17-32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Purcell, J. H., Burns, D., Tomlinson, C., Imbeau, M., & Martin, J. (2002). Bridging the gap: A tool and technique to analyze and evaluate gifted education curricular units. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 306–321. doi: 10.1177/001698620204600407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reiss, M. (2005). The importance of affect in science education. In S. Alsop (Ed.), Beyond Cartesian dualism (pp. 17–25). The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-3808-9_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosiek, J. (2003). Emotional scaffolding an exploration of the teacher knowledge at the intersection of student emotion and the subject matter. Journal of Teacher Education, 54, 399–412. doi: 10.1177/0022487103257089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. (2005). Interest as the missing motivator in self-regulation. European Psychologist, 10, 175–186. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040.10.3.175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saracho, O. N., & Spodek, B. (2008). Contemporary perspectives on science and technology in early childhood education. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Schattle, H. (2008). The practices of global citizenship. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  59. Semken, S., & Freeman, C. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92, 1042–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sisk, D. (2009). Myth 13: The regular classroom teacher can “go it alone”. The Gifted Child Quarterly, 53, 269–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sobel, D. (2005). Place-based education: Connecting classrooms and communities. Barrington, MA: The Orion Society.Google Scholar
  62. Sousa, D., & Pilecki, T. (2013). From STEM to STEAM: Using brain-compatible strategies to integrate the arts. Newbury Park: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  63. Stringer, E. (2007). Action research. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  64. Tobin, K., & Llena, R. (2010). Producing and maintaining culturally adaptive teaching and learning of science in urban schools. In C. Murphy & K. Scantlebury (Eds.), Coteaching in international contexts (pp. 79–103). The Netherlands: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ulrich, R. (1983). Aesthetic and affective response to the natural environment. In I. Altman & J. Wohlwill (Eds.), Behavior and the natural environment: Human behavior and environment advances in theory and research (Vol. 6, pp. 85–126). New York: Plenum. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4613-3539-9_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Werner, E. E., & Smith, R. (1992). Overcoming the odds: High risk children from birth to adulthood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Woffinden, S., & Packham, J. (2001). Experiential learning, just do it! The Agriculture Education Magazine, 73, 8–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pamela W. Garner
    • 1
  • Nuria Gabitova
    • 2
  • Anuradha Gupta
    • 2
  • Thomas Wood
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Integrative StudiesGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA
  2. 2.iSchool for the FutureFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options