Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 751–760 | Cite as

Deeper than rhizomes, becoming decalcomaniacal: a reflexive response to Murakami and Siegel’s “Becoming Bermuda grass”

  • Debra Bailey Mitchell
Forum

Abstract

In responding to Murakami and Siegel’s “Becoming Bermuda grass,” one is led to reflect on one’s own practice in what becomes an example of reflexivity. Following the authors’ lead of incorporating Deleuze and Guattari’s rhizomatic theory and the art form of decalcomania to reflect on practice, discoveries are made regarding the practice of a middle school science teacher. These reflective discoveries can be used to inform teaching practice in a manner that supports the development of identities of participation.

Keywords

Rhizome mapping Rhizomatic theory Reflexivity Decalcomania 

References

  1. Baker, W. (2015). Sticking point: History, manufacturing techniques, and preservation of decals. Collections: A Journal for Museum and Archives Professionals, 11(4), 275–290.Google Scholar
  2. Bartha, P. (2016). Analogy and analogical reasoning. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2016 Edition). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reasoning-analogy/>.
  3. Barton, A. C. (2007). Science learning in urban settings. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 319–343). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  4. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73. doi: 10.1002/tea.20269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  6. Dewey, J. (1934). Art as experience. New York, NY: Minton, Balch and Company.Google Scholar
  7. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  8. Durozoi, G. (2002). History of the surrealist movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  9. Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the post-modern age. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  11. Numeroff, L. (1991). If You Give a Moose a Muffin. New York, NY: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  12. Rudolph, H., Mitchell, D. B., & Tippins, D. J. (2015). Authentic gardening experience, community connections, and action! A web of supports and constraints for urban middle school agricultural science learning. In G. M. Barnett & A. Patchen (Eds.), STEM learning through Urban agriculture and gardens. The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Stuckey, M., Hofstein, A., Mamlok-Naaman, R., & Eilks, I. (2013). The meaning of ‘relevance’in science education and its implications for the science curriculum. Studies in Science Education, 49(1), 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tourney, C. (2010). Elegance and empiricism. Nature Nanotechnology, 5, 693–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clarke Middle SchoolAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations