Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 13, Issue 3, pp 823–835 | Cite as

Dreaming and immanence: rejecting the dogmatic image of thought in science education

  • Jesse BazzulEmail author
  • Maria F. G. Wallace
  • Marc Higgins


In this article, we, a multivocal-thinking-assemblage, trouble what we feel is the dogmatic image of thought in science education. Beginning with Lars Bang’s (Cult Stud Sci Educ, 2017) dramatic and disruptive imagery of the Ouroboros as a means to challenge scientific literacy we explore the importance of dreams, thinking with both virtual and actual entities, and immanent thinking to science education scholarship. Dreaming as movement away from a dogmatic image of thought takes the authors in multiple directions as they attempt to open Deleuzian horizons of difference, immanence, and self-exploration.


Ontology Deleuze Politics Science Virtual Critical theory 


  1. Bang, L. (2017). In the maw of the Ouroboros – an analysis of scientific literacy and democracy. Cultural Studies of Science Education. Scholar
  2. Barad, K. (2000). Reconceiving scientific literacy as agential literacy. In R. Reed & S. Traweek (Eds.), Doing science + culture (pp. 221–258). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Bazzul, J. (2015). Towards a politicized notion of citizenship for science education: Engaging the social through dissensus. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 221–233. Scholar
  4. Bazzul, J., & Kayumova, S. (2016). Toward a social ontology for science education: Introducing Deleuze and Guattari’s assemblages. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(3), 284–299. Scholar
  5. Blades, D. W. (2006). Levinas and an ethics for science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5), 647–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2011). Nomadic theory: The portable Rosi Braidotti. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G. (1988). Foucault. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  9. Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Deleuze, G., & Bacon, F. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  11. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  12. Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2007). Dialogues II. (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1985). The history of sexuality. The use of pleasure (Vol. 2). New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (2003). What is critique? In P. Rabinow & N. Rose (Eds.), The essential Foucault, selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984 (pp. 263–278). New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (2014). Wrong-doing, truth-telling: The function of avowal in justice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gough, N. (2004). RhizomANTically becoming-cyborg: Performing posthuman pedagogies. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 253–265. Scholar
  17. Gough, N. (2006). Shaking the tree, making a rhizome: Towards a nomadic geophilosophy of science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 625–645. Scholar
  18. Gough, N., & Price, L. (2009). Rewording the world: Poststructuralism, deconstruction and the ‘real’ in environmental/science education research. In K. Setati, R. Vithal, C. Malcolm, & R. Dhunpath (Eds.), Researching possibilities in mathematics, science and technology education (pp. 55–70). New York, NY: Nova Science.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. (2013). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below: Feminisms, postcolonialities, and modernities. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Higgins, M. (2017). Reconfiguring the optics of the critical gaze in science education (after the critique of critique): (Re)thinking “what counts” through foucaultian prismatics. Cultural Studies in Science Education. Scholar
  22. Kayumova, S., & Bazzul, J. (2017). The ethical, political potential of new materialisms for science education. In K. Scantlebury & C. Milne’s (Eds.), Material practice and materiality: Too long ignored in science education. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  23. Krejsler, J. B. (2016). Seize the opportunity to think differently! A Deleuzian approach to unleashing becomings in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 48(14), 1475–1485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lorraine, T. (2011). Deleuze and Guattari's immanent ethics: Theory, subjectivity, and duration. New York: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  25. May, T. (2005). Gilles Deleuze: An introduction. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McKenzie, M. (2009). Pedagogical transgression: Toward intersubjective agency and action. In M. McKenzie, P. Hart, H. Bai, & B. Jickling (Eds.), Fields of green: Restorying culture, environment, and education (pp. 211–226). Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  27. Morphet, S. (2013). Suzanne Morphet. Writing and Photography.
  28. Pavel, T. G. (1986). Fictional worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  30. Roth, W. M. (2015). Schooling is the problem: A plaidoyer for its deinstitutionalization. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 15(3), 315–331. Scholar
  31. Wallace, M. F. G. (in press). Subjects in the threshold: Opening-up ethnographic moments that complicate the novice/veteran science teacher binary. Issues in Teacher Education: Special Issue. Google Scholar
  32. Wallin, J. J. (2014). Education needs to get a grip on life. In M. Carlin & J. Wallin (Eds.), Deleuze and Guattari, politics and education: For a people-yet-to-come (pp. 117–140). New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  33. Weinstein, M., Blades, D., & Gleason, S. C. (2016). Questioning power: Deframing the STEM discourse. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 201–212. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesse Bazzul
    • 1
    Email author
  • Maria F. G. Wallace
    • 2
  • Marc Higgins
    • 3
  1. 1.University of ReginaReginaCanada
  2. 2.Louisiana State UniversityBaton RougeUSA
  3. 3.University of AlbertaEdmontonCanada

Personalised recommendations