Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 335–347 | Cite as

Breaking the spell of differentiated instruction through equity pedagogy and teacher community

  • Nicole A. Bannister
Forum
First Online:

Abstract

Koomen’s study of Wizard—an articulate, inquisitive, energetic seventh grader with a penchant for science—adversely juxtaposed his learning-centered identity with classroom experiences that marginalized him. I claim in my response that critical commentary about Wizard’s race is germane to any analysis of his experiences, as participation in an inclusive science classroom can be conceptualized as a racialized form of experience. My paper contributes a counternarrative to deficit normalizations of African American children—including students identified with exceptionalities—by rendering the inequities of differentiated instruction visible and theorizing about how this approach restricted Wizard’s learning and participation by positioning him as low status and less competent. I discuss four reasons why the strategy of differentiated instruction is ideologically opposed to goals for equitable classrooms and argue that this model invites reproductions of status orderings from the larger society into the classroom. I conclude with recommendations for an equity pedagogy through Complex Instruction developed inside teacher community as a viable alternative for this work.

Keywords

Complex Instruction Status Equity Differentiated instruction Special education 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Banks, J. (1993). Multicultural education: Historical development, dimensions, and practice. Review of Research in Education, 19, 3–49.Google Scholar
  2. Banks, J. (2013). Multicultural education: Characteristics and goals. In J. Banks & C. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (8th ed., pp. 3–23). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  3. Banks, J. (2014). Series forward. In N. S. Nasir, C. Cabana, B. Shreve, E. Woodbury, & N. Louie (Eds.), Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice (pp. vii–x). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bannister, N. A. (2015). Reframing practice: Teacher learning through interactions in a collaborative group. Journal of the Learning Sciences. doi: 10.1080/10508406.2014.999196.Google Scholar
  5. Baroody, A. (2011). Learning: A framework. In F. Fennell (Ed.), Achieving fluency: Special education and mathematics (pp. 15–58). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  6. Bicard, S. C., & Hewerd, W. L. (2013). Educational equality for students with disabilities. In J. Banks & C. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (8th ed., pp. 245–268). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Blanchett, W. J. (2006). Disproportionate representation of African American students in special education: Acknowledging the role of white privilege and racism. Educational Researcher, 35(6), 24–28. doi: 10.3102/0013189X035006024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Boaler, J., & Staples, M. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside school. Teachers College Record, 110(3), 608–645.Google Scholar
  9. Cabana, C., Shreve, B., & Woodbury, E. (2014). Working toward an equity pedagogy. In N. S. Nasir, C. Cabana, B. Shreve, E. Woodbury, & N. Louie (Eds.), Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice (pp. 35–52). New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cohen, E. G. (1994a). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1–35. doi: 10.3102/00346543064001001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cohen, E. G. (1994b). Status treatments for the classroom. New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, E. G. (2000). Equitable classrooms in a changing society. In M. Hallinan (Ed.), Handbook of the sociology of education (pp. 265–283). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (2014). Designing groupwork: Strategies for the heterogeneous classroom (3rd ed.). New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, E. G., Lotan, R. A., Scarloss, B. A., & Arellano, A. R. (1999). Complex instruction: Equity in cooperative learning classrooms. Theory into Practice, 38(2), 80–86. doi: 10.1080/00405849909543836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Esmonde, I. (2009). Supporting equity in cooperative mathematics learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 1008–1043. doi: 10.3102/0034654309332562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ford, D. Y. (2013). Recruiting and retaining gifted students from different ethnic, cultural, and language groups. In J. Banks & C. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (8th ed., pp. 292–310). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Gutiérrez, R. (1996). Practices, beliefs and cultures of high school mathematics departments: Understanding their influence on student advancement. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 28(5), 495–592. doi: 10.1080/0022027980280501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hand, V. (2014). “Taking up our space”: Becoming competent learners in mathematics classrooms. In N. S. Nasir, C. Cabana, B. Shreve, E. Woodbury, & N. Louie (Eds.), Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice (pp. 91–106). New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  19. Horn, I. S. (2012). Strength in numbers: Collaborative learning in secondary mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.Google Scholar
  20. Jilk, L. M. (2014). “Everybody can be somebody”: Expanding and valorizing secondary school mathematics practices to support engagement and success. In N. S. Nasir, C. Cabana, B. Shreve, E. Woodbury, & N. Louie (Eds.), Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice (pp. 107–128). New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). It’s not the culture of poverty, it’s the poverty of culture: The problem with teacher education. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 37(2), 104–109. doi: 10.1525/aeq.2006.37.2.104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary Education, 32(3), 34–62.Google Scholar
  23. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. (1996). Collective responsibility for learning and its effects on gains in achievement and engagement for early secondary school students. American Journal of Education, 104(2), 103–147. doi: 10.1086/444122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martin, D. B. (2006). Mathematics learning and participation as racialized forms of experience: African American parents speak on the struggle for mathematics literacy. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 8(3), 197–229. doi: 10.1207/s15327833mtl0803_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, D. B. (2009a). Liberating the production of knowledge about African American children and mathematics. In D. B. Martin (Ed.), Mathematics teaching, learning, and liberation in the lives of Black children (pp. 3–38). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Martin, D. B. (2009b). Researching race in mathematics education. Teacher’s College Record, 111(2), 295–338.Google Scholar
  27. Meyer, L., Bevan-Brown, J., Park, H. S., & Savage, C. (2013). School inclusion and multicultural issues in special education. In J. Banks & C. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (8th ed., pp. 269–290). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Nasir, N. S., Cabana, C., Shreve, B., Woodbury, E., & Louie, N. (Eds.). (2014). Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice. New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nieto, S., & Bode, P. (2013). School reform and student learning: A multicultural perspective. In J. Banks & C. M. Banks (Eds.), Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (8th ed., pp. 313–330). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
  30. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105–119.Google Scholar
  31. Sheldon, J. (2014). Transforming from the bottom up: A book review of mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 7(2), 97–103.Google Scholar
  32. Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). How to differentiate instruction in mixed-ability classrooms (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  33. Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). Differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  34. Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., et al. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2–3), 119–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tomlinson, C. A., & Kalbfleisch, M. L. (1998). Teach me, teach my brain: A call for differentiated classrooms. Educational Leadership, 56(3), 52–55.Google Scholar
  36. Tsu, R. L., Lotan, R. A., & Cossey, R. (2014). Building a vision for equitable learning. In N. S. Nasir, C. Cabana, B. Shreve, E. Woodbury, & N. Louie (Eds.), Mathematics for equity: A framework for successful practice (pp. 129–144). New York: Teacher’s College Press.Google Scholar
  37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Waldron, N., & McLeskey, J. (2001). An interview with Nancy Waldron and James McLeskey. Intervention and School & Clinic, 36(3), 175–183. doi: 10.1177/105345120103600307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Clemson UniversityClemsonUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options