Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 53–79 | Cite as

High school biology evolution learning experiences in a rural context: a case of and for cultural border crossing

  • Lisa A. Borgerding
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

Although the concept of “rural” is difficult to define, rural science education provides the possibility for learning centered upon a strong connection to the local community. Rural American adolescents tend to be more religious than their urban counterparts and less accepting of evolution than their non-rural peers. Because the status and perception of evolutionary theory may be very different within the students’ lifeworlds and the subcultures of the science classroom and science itself, a cultural border crossing metaphor can be applied to evolution teaching and learning. This study examines how a teacher may serve as a cultural border crossing tour guide for students at a rural high school as they explore the concept of biological evolution in their high school biology class. Data collection entailed two formal teacher interviews, field note observations of two biology class periods each day for 16 days during the Evolution unit, individual interviews with 14 students, student evolution acceptance surveys, student evolution content tests, and classroom artifacts. The major findings center upon three themes regarding how this teacher and these students had largely positive evolution learning experiences even as some students continued to reject evolution. First, the teacher strategically positioned himself in two ways: using his unique “local” trusted position in the community and school and taking a position in which he did not personally represent science by instead consistently teaching evolution “according to scientists.” Second, his instruction honored local “rural” funds of knowledge with respect to local knowledge of nature and by treating students’ religious knowledge as a form of local expertise about one set of answers to questions also addressed by evolution. Third, the teacher served as a border crossing “tour guide” by helping students identify how the culture of science and the culture of their lifeworlds may differ with respect to evolutionary theory. Students negotiated the cultural borders for learning evolution in several ways, and different types of border crossings are described. The students respected the teacher’s apparent neutrality, sensitivity toward multiple positions, explicit attention to religion/evolution, and transparency of purposes for teaching evolution. These findings add to the current literature on rural science education by highlighting local funds of knowledge for evolution learning and how rural teachers may help students navigate seemingly hazardous scientific topics. The study’s findings also add to the current evolution education literature by examining how students’ religious perspectives may be respected as a form of expertise about questions of origins by allowing students to examine similarities and differences between scientific and religious approaches to questions of biological origins and change.

Keywords

Evolution Border crossing Funds of knowledge High school biology Rural science education 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27, 1–52. doi: 10.1080/03057269608560077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Student’s ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180–188. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<180:AID-SCE50>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. J. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 269–287. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269:AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2-T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alexakos, K., & Pierwola, A. (2013). Learning at the “boundaries”: Radical listening, creationism, and learning from the “other”. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 8, 39–49. doi: 10.1007/s11422-012-9470-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: Valuing local knowledge. Theory into Practice, 52, 28–35. doi: 10.1080/07351690.2013.743769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Avery, L. M., & Kassam, K. (2011). Phronesis: Children’s local rural knowledge of science and engineering. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26, 1–18.Google Scholar
  7. Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2009). Funds of knowledge and discourses and hybrid space. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 50–73. doi: 10.1002/tea.20269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biesta, G. (2010). Pragmatism and the philosophical foundations of mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781506335193.Google Scholar
  9. Bishop, B. A., & Anderson, C. W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 417–425. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660270503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  11. Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  12. Costa, V. B. (1995). When science is “another world”: Relationships between worlds of family, friends, school, and science. Science Education, 79, 313–333. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730790306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowie, B., Jones, A., & Otrel-Cass, K. (2011). Re-engaging students in science: Issues of assessment, funds of knowledge and sites for learning. International Journal of Science Education, 9, 347–366. doi: 10.1007/s10763-010-9229-0.Google Scholar
  14. Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.Google Scholar
  15. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to the acceptance of biological evolution among Turkish preservice biology teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420–443. doi: 10.1002/tea.20223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donnelly, L. A., Kazempour, M., & Amirshokoohi, A. (2009). High school students’ perceptions of evolution instruction: Acceptance and evolution learning experiences. Research in Science Education, 39, 643–660. doi: 10.1007/s11165-008-9097-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  18. Goldston, M. J., & Kyzer, P. (2009). Teaching evolution: Narratives with a view from three southern biology teachers in the USA. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 762–790. doi: 10.1002/tea.20289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gonzalez, N., & Moll, L. C. (2002). Cruzando el Puente: Building bridges to funds of knowledge. Educational Policy, 16, 623–641. doi: 10.1177/0895904802016004009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodpaster, K. P. S., Adedokun, O. A., & Weaver, G. C. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of rural STEM teaching: Implications for rural teacher retention. Rural Educator, 33, 9–22.Google Scholar
  21. Griffith, J. A., & Brem, S. K. (2004). Teaching evolutionary biology: Pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 791–809. doi: 10.1002/tea.20027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hermann, R. S. (2008). Evolution as a controversial issue: A review of instructional approaches. Science & Education, 17, 1011–1032. doi: 10.1007/s11191-007-9074-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hermann, R. S. (2013). High school biology teachers’ views on teaching evolution: Implications for science teacher educators. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 597–616. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9328-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Mazur, A. (2005). Believers and disbelievers in evolution. Politics and the Life Sciences, 23, 55–61. doi: 10.2990/1471-5457(2004)23[55:BADIE]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y., & Strayer, J. (2002). Creationist vs. evolutionary beliefs: Effects on learning biology. American Biology Teacher, 64, 189–197. doi: 10.2307/4451275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McLaughlin, D. S., & Barton, A. C. (2013). Preservice teachers’ uptake and understanding of funds of knowledge in elementary science. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24, 13–36. doi: 10.1007/s10972-012-9284-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Meadows, L., Foster, E., & Jackson, D. F. (2000). Managing the conflict between evolution and religion. American Biology Teacher, 62, 102–107. doi: 10.1662/0002-7685(2000)062[0102:MTCBER]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  29. Moje, E. B., Ciechanowski, K. M., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working toward third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 38–70. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.1.4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31, 132–141. doi: 10.1080/00405849209543534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Academy of Sciences. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. doi: 10.17226/5787.Google Scholar
  32. National Center for Education Statistics. (2006). Definitions: School Locale Definitions. Retrieved February 19, 2015, from http://nces.ed.gov/surveys/ruraled/definitions.asp#how
  33. National Research Council. (2011). A Framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas (advance copy). Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nehm, R. H., & Schonfeld, I. S. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18, 699–723. doi: 10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. NGSS Lead States. (2012). Next generation science standards: For states by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18290.Google Scholar
  36. Oliveira, A. W., Cook, K., & Buck, G. A. (2011). Framing evolution discussions intellectually. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 257–280. doi: 10.1002/tea.20396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Oliver, J. S. (2007). Rural Science Education. In S. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook on research on science education (pp. 345–369). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  38. Oughton, H. (2010). Funds of knowledge: A conceptual critique. Studies in the Education of Adults, 42, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Phelan, P., Davidson, A. L., & Cao, H. T. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer, and school cultures. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 22, 224–250. doi: 10.1525/aeq.1991.22.3.05x1051k.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Reiss, M. J. (2010). Science and religion: Implications for science educators. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 5, 91–101. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9211-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 13–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1999.tb17441.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sanders, M., & Ngxola, N. (2009). Addressing teachers’ concerns about teaching evolution. Journal of Biological Education, 43, 121–128. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2009.9656166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Scott, E. C. (2009). Evolution versus creationism: An introduction (2nd ed.). Westport: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  44. Seiler, G. (2013). New metaphors about culture: Implications for research in science teacher preparation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 104–121. doi: 10.1002/tea.21067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Settelmaier, W. (2010). The conflict on genesis: Building an integral bridge between creation and evolution. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 5, 243–249. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9250-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Settlage, J, Jr. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 449–457. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660310503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smith, M. U. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science & Education, 19, 539–571. doi: 10.1007/s11191-009-9216-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stolberg, T. L. (2010). Teaching Darwinian evolution: Learning from religious education. Science & Education, 19, 679–692. doi: 10.1007/s11191-009-9187-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tan, E., & Barton, A. C. (2010). Transforming science learning and student participation in sixth grade science: A case study of a low-income, urban, racial minority classroom. Equity & Excellence in Education, 43, 38–55. doi: 10.1080/10665680903472367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Upadhyay, B. R. (2006). Using students’ lived experiences in an urban science classroom: An elementary school teacher’s thinking. Science Education, 90, 94–110. doi: 10.1002/sce.20095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Velez-Ibanez, C. G., & Greenberg, J. B. (1992). Formation and transformation of funds of knowledge among U.S.-Mexican households. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 23, 313–335. doi: 10.1525/aeq.1992.23.4.05x1582v.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wallace, J. M., Forman, T. A., Caldwell, C. H., & Willis, D. (2003). Religion and U.S. secondary students: Current patterns, recent trends, and sociodemographic correlates. Youth and Society, 35, 98–125. doi: 10.1177/0044118X03254564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Woods, C. S., & Scharmann, L. C. (2001). High school students’ perceptions of evolutionary theory. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2).Google Scholar
  54. Zimmerman, M. (1986). The Evolution-Creation controversy: Opinions from students at a “liberal” liberal arts college. Ohio Journal of Science, 86, 134–139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Teaching, Learning, and Curriculum StudiesKent State UniversityKentUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options