Advancing educational diversity: antifragility, standardization, democracy, and a multitude of education options
Abstract
This essay is a response to a paper by Avery and Hains that raises questions about the often unintended effects of knowledge standardization in an educational setting. While many K-12 schools are implementing common core standards, and many institutions of higher education are implementing their own standardized educational practices, the question is raised about what is lost in this effort to ensure regularity and consistency in educational outcomes. One such casualty may be local knowledge, which in a rural context includes ancestral knowledge about land, society, and cultural meaning. This essay explores whether or not efforts to standardize crowd out such knowledge, and decrease the diversity of knowledge within our society’s complex ecosystem—thus making the ecosystem weaker. Using antifragility as a useful idea for examining system complexity, the essay considers the impact of standardization on innovation, democracy, and the valuation of some forms of knowledge (and its bearers) above others.
Keywords
Rural education Standardization Antifragility Diversity DemocracyReferences
- Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin UK.Google Scholar
- Bleiberg, J., & West, D. (2014). In defense of the Common Core standards. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute, Center for Technology Innovation.Google Scholar
- Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2015). Accessed at: http://www.corestandards.org.
- Denhart, C. (2013). How the $1.2 trillion debt crisis is crippling students, parents and the economy. Forbes, August 7, 2013, accessed at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/specialfeatures/2013/08/07/how-the-college-debt-is-crippling-students-parents-and-the-economy/.
- Fortunato, M. W. P., Alter, T. R., Frumento, P. Z., & Klos, J. M. (2014). Cultivating a culture of innovative university engagement for local entrepreneurship development in rural and distressed regions. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 3(1), 122–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Foxon, T. J. (2002). Technological and institutional ‘lock-in’as a barrier to sustainable innovation. Imperial College Centre for Policy and Technology Working Paper.Google Scholar
- Liebowitz, S. J., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in, and history. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11, 205.Google Scholar
- Long, C. (2013). Six ways the Common Core is good for students. NEAToday, May 10, 2013, accessed at: http://neatoday.org/2013/05/10/six-ways-the-common-core-is-good-for-students-2/.
- Lopez, S. J. (2012). Many in U.S. doubt that students are prepared for work. Gallup, August 22, 2012, accessed at: http://www.gallup.com/poll/156818/doubt-students-prepared-work.aspx.
- Peters, S. J., Alter, T. R., & Schwartzbach, N. (2010). Democracy and higher education: Traditions and stories of civic engagement. East Lansing, MI: MSU Press.Google Scholar
- Schmid, A. A. (2008). Conflict and cooperation: institutional and behavioral economics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). New York: Transaction publishers.Google Scholar
- Taleb, N. N. (2012). Antifragile: things that gain from disorder. New York: Random House Incorporated.Google Scholar
- Washington, A. T. & Salmon, B. M. (2014). High cost of education forcing colleges, students to make difficult decisions. Diverse Issues in Higher Education, March 9, 2014, accessed at: http://diverseeducation.com/article/61105/.
- Zimmer, T. (2014). Are recent grads prepared for the workplace? Forbes, August 6, 2014.Google Scholar