Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 12, Issue 3, pp 581–604 | Cite as

Student science achievement and the integration of Indigenous knowledge on standardized tests

  • Juliann Dupuis
  • Eleanor Abrams
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

In this article, we examine how American Indian students in Montana performed on standardized state science assessments when a small number of test items based upon traditional science knowledge from a cultural curriculum, “Indian Education for All”, were included. Montana is the first state in the US to mandate the use of a culturally relevant curriculum in all schools and to incorporate this curriculum into a portion of the standardized assessment items. This study compares White and American Indian student test scores on these particular test items to determine how White and American Indian students perform on culturally relevant test items compared to traditional standard science test items. The connections between student achievement on adapted culturally relevant science test items versus traditional items brings valuable insights to the fields of science education, research on student assessments, and Indigenous studies.

Keywords

Standardized tests Indigenous Science 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abrams, E., Taylor, P. C., & Gou, C. (2013). Contextualizing culturally relevant science and mathematics teaching for indigenous learners. International Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 11(1), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abrams, E., Yore, L. D., Bang, M., Brayboy, B., Castagno, A., Kidman, J., et al. (2014). Culturally relevant schooling in science for Indigenous learners worldwide: Stressing the all in science literacy for all. In N. G. Lederman (Ed.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 671–697). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G. S. (1997). Toward a first nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Science Education, 81, 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aikenhead, G. S. (2001a). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders into school science. Science Education, 85, 180–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aikenhead, G. S. (2001b). Integrating western and aboriginal sciences: Cross-cultural science teaching. Research in Science Education, 31, 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aikenhead, G. S. (2006). Towards decolonizing the pan-Canadian science framework. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 6(4), 387–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aikenhead, G. S., & Michell, H. (2011). Bridging cultures: Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing nature. Toronto, ON: Pearson Canada Inc.Google Scholar
  8. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1990). Science for all Americans online. Retrieved from http://www.project2061.org/publications/sfaa/online/chap1.htm#sci.
  9. American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Arroyo, C. G. (2008). The funding gap. Washington, DC: The Education Trust. Retrieved from http://www.closingtheachievementgap.org/cs/ctag/view/resources/75.
  11. Barnhardt, R. (2005). Creating a place for indigenous knowledge in education: The Alaska Native knowledge network. In Greg Smith & David Gruenewald (Eds.), Local diversity: Place-based education in the global age (pp. 113–134). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  12. Barnhardt, R., & Kawagley, A. O. (2005). Indigenous knowledge systems and Alaska Native ways of knowing. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(1), 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barnhardt, R., Kawagley, A. O., & Hill, F. (2000). Cultural standards and test scores. Sharing Our Pathways, 5(4), 1–4.Google Scholar
  14. Battiste, M. (2002). Indigenous knowledge and pedagogy in First Nations education: A literature review with recommendations. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: National Working Group on Education and the Minister of Indian Affairs Indian and Northern Affairs.Google Scholar
  15. Battiste, M., Kovach, M., & Balzer, G. (2010). Celebrating the local, negotiating the school: Language and literacy in aboriginal communities. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 32, 4–12.Google Scholar
  16. Burch, P. E. (2007). Educational policy and practice from the perspective of institutional theory: Crafting a wider lens. Educational Researcher, 36(2), 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cajete, G. (1988). Motivating American Indian students in science and math. Las Cruces, NM: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.Google Scholar
  18. Canadian Council on Learning. (2007). The cultural divide in science education for Aboriginal learners. Retrieved from http://www.ccl-cca.ca/pdfs/LessonsInLearning/Feb-01-07-The-cultural-divide-in-science.pdf.
  19. Davis, J. (2001). American Indian boarding school experiences: Recent studies from native perspectives. OAH Magazine of History Desegregation, 15(2), 20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary education: School year 2008–2009. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2011/expenditures/tables.asp.
  21. Department of the Interior. (2012). Budget in brief. Fiscal year 2012, p. DH-68.Google Scholar
  22. Dupuis, J. & Abrams, E. (2016). Examining cultural bias in standardized science test items (Manuscript in preparation).Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, M. M. R. (1992). The nature and utility of traditional ecological knowledge. Northern Perspectives, 20(1), 9–12.Google Scholar
  24. Freeman, C., & Fox, M. (2005). Status and trends in the education of American Indians and Alaska Natives. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
  25. Fuchs, E., & Havighurst, R. J. (1973). To live on this earth: American Indian education. New York: Anchor Press, Doubleday.Google Scholar
  26. Hayward, E. O. (2012). Evaluating measurement tools in science education research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 979–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hursh, D. (2001). Neoliberalism and the control of teachers, students, and learning: The rise of standards, standardization, and accountability. Cultural Logic, 4(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
  28. International Council for Science Study Group. (2002). Science and traditional knowledge. Report from the ICSU study group on science and traditional knowledge. Retrieved from http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/science-traditional-knowledge/Science-traditional-knowledge.pdf.
  29. Jegede, O. J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (1999). Transcending cultural borders: Implications for science teaching. Journal for Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 45–66.Google Scholar
  30. Jensen, E. (2009). Teaching with poverty in mind: What being poor does to kids’ brains and what schools can do about it. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
  31. Johnston, P. M. (2010). Towards culturally appropriate assessment? A contribution to the debates. Higher Education Quarterly, 64(3), 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kawagley, A. O., & Barnhardt, R. (1998). Education Indigenous to place: Western science meets Native reality. Fairbanks, AK: Alaska Native Knowledge Network, University of Alaska. Retrieved from http://www.ankn.uaf.edu/Curriculum/Articles/BarnhardtKawagley/EIP.html.
  33. Kidman, J., Yen, C.-F., & Abrams, E. (2013). Indigenous students experiences of the hidden curriculum in science education: A cross-national study in New Zealand and Taiwan. International Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 11(1), 43–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mack, E., Augare, H., Different Cloud-Jones, L., Davíd, D., Quiver Gaddie, H., Honey, R. E., et al. (2012). Effective practices for creating transformative informal science education programs grounded in Native ways of knowing. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7(1), 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCall, M. S., Hauser, C., Cronin, J., Kingsbury, G. G., & Houser, R. (2006). Achievement gaps: An examination of differences in student achievement and growth. Pottsboro, TX: Northwest Evaluation Association. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED498429.pdf.
  36. Mead, N., Grigg, W., Moran, R., & Kuang, M. (2010). National Indian Education Study 2009—Part II: The educational experiences of American Indian and Alaska Native students in grades 4 and 8 (NCES 2010-463). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/pdf/studies/2010463.pdf.
  37. Montana Office of Public Instruction. (2010). Montana content standards: Integration of Indian education for all. Retrieved from http://connect.opi.mt.gov/p88481204/?launcher=falseandfcsContent=trueandpbMode=normal.
  38. Moon, T. R., Brighton, C. M., Jarvis, J. M., & Hall, C. J. (2007). State standardized testing programs: Their effects on teachers and students (RM07228). Storrs, CT: The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
  39. Munroe, E., Lunney Borden, L., Murray Orr, A., Toney, D., & Meader, J. (2013). Decolonizing aboriginal education in the 21st century. McGill Journal of Education, 48(2), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murphy, S. (2007). At last: Culture and consequences: The canaries in the coal mine. Research in the Teaching of English, 42(2), 228–244.Google Scholar
  41. National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). NAEP overview. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/about/.
  42. National Conference of State Legislatures. (2008). Striving to achieve: Helping Native American students succeed—National Caucus of Native American State Legislatures. http://www.ncsl.org/Portals/1/documents/statetribe/strivingtoachieve.pdf.
  43. Nelson, S., Greenough, R., & Sage, N. (2009). Achievement gap patterns of grade 8 American Indian and Alaska Native students in reading and math (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2009-No. 073). Washington, DC: US Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, and Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest. Retrieved from www.ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
  44. Noble, T., Suarez, C., Rosebery, A., O’Connor, M., Warren, B., & Hudicourt-Barnes, J. (2012). “I never thought of it as freezing”: How students answer questions on large-scale science tests and what they know about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(6), 778–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. No Child Left Behind Act. (2002). Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/107-110.pdf.
  46. Ogawa, M. (1995). Science education in a multiscience perspective. Science Education, 79(5), 583–593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Reis, G., & Ng-A-Fook, N. (2010). TEK talk: So what? Language and the decolonization of narrative gatekeepers of science education curriculum. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 1009–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rizvi, F. (2008). Epistemic virtues and cosmopolitan learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 35(1), 17–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Said, E. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  51. Snively, G. J., & Williams, L. B. (2008). “Coming to know”: Weaving Aboriginal and western science knowledge, language, and literacy into the science classroom. L1—Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 8(1), 109–133. Retrieved from http://l1.publication-archive.com/public?fn=enterandrepository=1andarticle=218.
  52. Thompson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Buckley, S. (2013). PISA 2012: How Australia measures up. Camberwell, VIC: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.Google Scholar
  53. US Commission on Civil Rights. (2003). A quiet crisis: Federal funding and unmet needs in Indian country. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/PDFS/ED480450.pdf.
  54. Visone, J. (2010). Science or reading: What is being measured by standardized tests? American Secondary Education, 39(1), 95–112.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationNotre Dame of Maryland UniversityBaltimoreUSA
  2. 2.Department of EducationUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options