Inquiry identity and science teacher professional development
An effective inquiry-oriented science teacher possesses more than the skills of teaching through investigation. They must address philosophies, and ways of interacting as a member of a group of educators who value and practice science through inquiry. Professional development opportunities can support inquiry identity development, but most often they address teaching practices from limited cognitive perspectives, leaving unexplored the shifts in identity that may accompany teachers along their journey in becoming skilled in inquiry-oriented instruction. In this forum article, we envision Victoria Deneroff’s argument that “professional development could be designed to facilitate reflexive transformation of identity within professional learning environments” (2013, p. 33). Instructional coaching, cogenerative dialogues, and online professional communities are discussed as ways to promote inquiry identity formation and collaboration in ways that empower and deepen science teachers’ conversations related to personal and professional efficacy in the service of improved science teaching and learning.
KeywordsInquiry Identity Science education Professional development Community of practice
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- De Jong, O. (2007). Trends in western science curricula and science education research: A bird’s eye view. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1), 15–22.Google Scholar
- Lawrenz, F., & Desjardins, C. D. (2012). Trends in US Government-Funded Multisite K—12 Science Program Evaluation. In Second international handbook of science education (pp. 723–734). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
- Mensah, F. M. (2012). Positional identity as a lens for connecting elementary preservice teachers to teaching in urban classrooms. In M. Varelas (Ed.), Identity construction and science education research: Learning, teaching, and being in multiple contexts (pp. 105–121). The Netherlands: Sense Publishers. doi: 10.1007/978-94-6209-043-9_8.
- National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- NQSS Consortium of Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: By states, for states. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Roth, W.-M., & Tobin, K. (2004). Cogenerative dialoguing and metaloguing: Reflexivity of processes and genres. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 5(3), Art. 7.Google Scholar
- Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Coteaching/cogenerative dialoguing in an urban science teacher preparation program. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Teaching together, learning together (pp. 59–77). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar