John Falk and Lynn Dierking: building the field of informal/free-choice science education
Abstract
This article establishes the importance of “context”, a concept that underpins the academic contributions that John Falk and Lynn Dierking have made in building the field of informal/free-choice learning in science education. I consider, in turn, the individual contributions made by each of them prior to their seminal co-authored work, entitled The Museum Experience. I then document their joint contributions to the field, pointing out that although their interests and skills overlap in complementary ways to produce their jointly authored works, both have continued to make their individual contributions; Falk in his work on identity and impact, and Dierking in her work on community, youth, family and equity. Finally I come to the present, describing how they each continue their research and publication in lifelong, life-wide, and life-deep learning, with a particular focus on free-choice learning and the role it can play in addressing critical issues in the world.
Keywords
Free-choice Informal science education Life-long learningReferences
- Bamberger, Y., & Tal, T. (2007). Learning in a personal context: Levels of choice in a free choice learning environment in science and natural history museums. Science Education, 91, 75–95. doi: 10.1002/sce.20174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Dierking, L. D., Falk, J. H., Rennie, L., Anderson, D., & Ellenbogen, K. (2003). Policy statement of the “Informal Science Education” Ad Hoc Committee. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 108–111. doi: 10.1002/tea.10066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H. (1971). Guarding your thermometers. American Biology Teacher, 33, 295–296. doi: 10.2307/4443471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H. (1974). Estimating experimenter induced bias in field studies: A cautionary tale. Oikos, 25, 374–378. doi: 10.2307/3543959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H. (1976). Energetics of a suburban lawn ecosystem. Ecology, 57, 141–150. doi: 10.2307/1936405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H. (1983). Time and behavior as predictors of learning. Science Education, 67, 267–276. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730670214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H. (1997). Recent advances in the neurosciences: Implications for visitor studies. In M. Wells & R. Loomis (Eds.), Visitor studies: Theory, research and practice (Vol. 9, pp. 227–238). Jacksonville, AL: Visitor Studies Association.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H. (Ed.). (2001). Free-choice science education: How we learn science outside of school. New York, NY: Teacher’s College Press, Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H. (2004). The director’s cut: Towards an improved understanding of learning from museums. Science Education, 88, S83–S96. doi: 10.1002/sce.20014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H. (2009). Identity and the museum visitor experience. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (1982). The field trip milieu: Learning and behavior as a function of contextual events. Journal of Educational Research, 76, 22–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (1992). The museum experience. Washington, DC: Whalesback Books.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (Eds.). (1995). Public institutions for personal learning: Establishing a research agenda. Washington, DC: American Association of Museums.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2000). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Lessons without limit: How free-choice learning is transforming education. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2012). Lifelong science learning for adults: The role of free-choice experiences. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (Vol. 2, pp. 1063–1079). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). The museum experience revisited. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., & Foutz, S. (Eds.). (2007). In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H., Dierking, L. D., Osborne, J., Wenger, M., Dawson, E. & Wong, B. (2015). Analyzing science education in the U.K.: Taking a system-wide approach. Science Education, 99, 145–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H., Koran, J. J, Jr., & Dierking, L. D. (1986). The things of science: Assessing the learning potential of science museums. Science Education, 70, 503–508. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730700504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H., Koran, J. J, Jr., Dierking, L. D., & Dreblow, L. (1985). Predicting visitor behavior. Curator, 28, 326–332. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.1985.tb01753.x.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H., Martin, W. W., & Balling, J. D. (1978). The novel field trip phenomenon: Adjustment to novel settings interferes with task learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 15, 127–134. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660150207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H., & Needham, M. D. (2013). Factors contributing to adult knowledge of science and technology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 431–452. doi: 10.1002/tea.21080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H., Reinhard, E. M., Vernon, C. L., Bronnenkant, K., Heimlich, J. E., & Deans, N. L. (2007). Why zoos & aquariums matter: Assessing the impact of a visit. Silver Spring, MD: Association of Zoos & Aquariums.Google Scholar
- Falk, J. H., Scott, C., Dierking, L., Rennie, L., & Jones, M. C. (2004). Interactives and visitor learning. Curator, 47, 171–198. doi: 10.1111/j.2151-6952.2004.tb00116.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Falk, J. H., & Storksdieck, M. (2005). Using the contextual model of learning to understand visitor learning from a science center exhibition. Science Education, 89, 744–778. doi: 10.1002/sce.20078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Koran, J. J, Jr., & Dierking-Shafer, L. (1982). Learning science in informal settings outside the classroom. In M. B. Rowe (Ed.), Science in the 80’s (pp. 52–62). Washington, DC: National Education Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 218 096).Google Scholar
- Koran, J. J, Jr., Longino, S. J., & Shafer, L. D. (1983). A framework for conceptualizing research in natural history museums and science centers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 325–339. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660200407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McCreedy, D., & Dierking, L. D. (2013). Cascading influences: Long-term impacts of informal STEM programs for girls. Philadelphia, PA: Franklin Institute Science Museum Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Phipps, M. (2010). Research trends and findings from a decade (1997–2007) of research on informal science education and free-choice science learning. Visitor Studies, 13, 3–22. doi: 10.1080/10645571003618717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rennie, L. J., & Feher, E. (2003). Informal education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 105–256. (special issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tal, T., & Dierking, L. D. (2014). Science learning in everyday life. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50, 251–406. (special issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar