“Disorienting, fun or meaningful?”: looking beyond the boundaries of the museum
Abstract
A growing body of research highlights how informal science learning environments (ISLE’s) can alter modes of participation in science for youth who are traditionally marginalized in science (Calabrese Barton and Tan in J Learn Sci 19(2):187–229, 2010). While these findings reveal successful examples of ISLE’s potential to bridge science and everyday life in powerful ways for traditionally marginalized youth, questions remain regarding the equitable access to designed learning environments such as museums for youth and families from these same communities (Feinstein and Meshoulam in J Res Sci Teach 51(3):368–394, 2014). In their article, Archer, Dawson, Seakins and Wong aptly attend to equity issues in designed ISLE’s and the notion of altering participation for youth and families from traditionally marginalized communities. In this response, I extend the conversation beyond the boundaries of the museum by (1) looking deeper into the issue of access and accessibility by discussing the collective experiences of marginalized youth across contexts and its impact on science participation and (2) arguing that altering participation requires transforming conceptions of learning and doing science that are often employed when designing and analyzing learning experiences for youth from traditionally marginalized communities.
Keywords
Informal science Equity TransformationReferences
- Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94, 1008–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barmby, P., Kind, P., & Jones, K. (2008). Examining changing attitudes in secondary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 30(8), 1075–1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin: Agency, identity and learning in a Green Energy Program. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Barton, A. C., & Yang, K. (2000). The culture of power and science education: Learning from Miguel. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 871–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Feinstein, N., & Meshoulam, D. (2014). Science for what public? Addressing equity in American science museums and science centers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 368–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fenichel, M., & Schweingruber, H. A. (2010). Surrounded by science: Learning science in informal environments. Board on Science Education. Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Luke, A., Green, J., & Kelly, G. J. (2010). What counts as evidence and equity? Review of Research in Education, 34, vii–xvi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The nation’s report card. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
- National Research Council (NRC). (2009). Learning science in informal environments: People, places, and pursuits. Washington, DC: The National Academies.Google Scholar
- Tan, E., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2012). Empowering science and mathematics education in urban schools. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tesfaye, C. L., & Mulvey, P. (2012). Physics bachelor’s initial employment. College Park, MD: American Institute of Physics.Google Scholar