Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 273–281 | Cite as

The feasibility of educating trainee science teachers in issues of science and religion

  • Michael Poole
Forum

Abstract

This article reflects on Roussel De Carvalho’s paper ‘Science initial teacher education and superdiversity: educating science teachers for a multi-religious and globalized science classroom’. It then offers suggestions for making some of the ambitious goals of the science-and-religion components of the science initial teacher education project more manageable.

Keywords

Science Religion Teacher education School science teaching Students’ religious beliefs/worldviews 

References

  1. Coulson, C. A. (1955). Science and religion: A changing relationship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Department for Education and Employment/Qualifications and Curriculum Authority (DFEE/QCA). (2006). Science: The national curriculum for England. London: HMSO.Google Scholar
  3. Flew, A. (1985). Thinking about social thinking: The philosophy of the social sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Galilei, G. [1632] (1967). Dialogue concerning the two chief world systems, (2nd ed.) (trans: Stillman Drake). London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  5. Mitchell, B. (1973). The justification of religious belief. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Poole, M. W. (1994). A critique of aspects of the philosophy and theology of Richard Dawkins. Science and Christian Belief, 6(1), 41–59.Google Scholar
  7. Poole, M. W. (1995). Beliefs and values in science education. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Poole, M. W. (2002). Explaining or explaining away? The concept of explanation in the science–theology debate. Science and Christian Belief, 14(2), 123–142.Google Scholar
  9. Poole, M. W. (2007). User’s guide to science and belief. Oxford: Lion Hudson.Google Scholar
  10. Poole, M. W. (2008). Creationism, intelligent design and science education. School Science Review, 90(330), 123–129.Google Scholar
  11. Poole, M. W. (2009). The ‘new’ atheism: Ten arguments that don’t hold water? Oxford: Lion Hudson.Google Scholar
  12. Poole, M. W. (2014). Challenges faced by faith-based schools with special reference to the interplay between science and religion. In J. D. Chapman, S. McNamara, M. J. Reiss, & Y. Waghid (Eds.), International handbook of learning, teaching and leading in faith-based schools’ (pp. 241–260). London: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-8972-1_13.Google Scholar
  13. Russell, C. A. (1987). Some founding fathers of physics. Physics Education, 22(1), 27–33. doi: 10.1088/0031-9120/22/1/004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Van Till, H. J. (1986). The fourth day. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Education and Professional StudiesKing’s College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations