Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 12, Issue 2, pp 369–385 | Cite as

Visualizing time: how linguistic metaphors are incorporated into displaying instruments in the process of interpreting time-varying signals

  • Germà Garcia-Belmonte
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

Spatial visualization is a well-established topic of education research that has allowed improving science and engineering students’ skills on spatial relations. Connections have been established between visualization as a comprehension tool and instruction in several scientific fields. Learning about dynamic processes mainly relies upon static spatial representations or images. Visualization of time is inherently problematic because time can be conceptualized in terms of two opposite conceptual metaphors based on spatial relations as inferred from conventional linguistic patterns. The situation is particularly demanding when time-varying signals are recorded using displaying electronic instruments, and the image should be properly interpreted. This work deals with the interplay between linguistic metaphors, visual thinking and scientific instrument mediation in the process of interpreting time-varying signals displayed by electronic instruments. The analysis draws on a simplified version of a communication system as example of practical signal recording and image visualization in a physics and engineering laboratory experience. Instrumentation delivers meaningful signal representations because it is designed to incorporate a specific and culturally favored time view. It is suggested that difficulties in interpreting time-varying signals are linked with the existing dual perception of conflicting time metaphors. The activation of specific space–time conceptual mapping might allow for a proper signal interpretation. Instruments play then a central role as visualization mediators by yielding an image that matches specific perception abilities and practical purposes. Here I have identified two ways of understanding time as used in different trajectories through which students are located. Interestingly specific displaying instruments belonging to different cultural traditions incorporate contrasting time views. One of them sees time in terms of a dynamic metaphor consisting of a static observer looking at passing events. This is a general and widespread practice common in the contemporary mass culture, which lies behind the process of making sense to moving images usually visualized by means of movie shots. In contrast scientific culture favored another way of time conceptualization (static time metaphor) that historically fostered the construction of graphs and the incorporation of time-dependent functions, as represented on the Cartesian plane, into displaying instruments. Both types of cultures, scientific and mass, are considered highly technological in the sense that complex instruments, apparatus or machines participate in their visual practices.

Keywords

Visualization Conceptual metaphor Instrument-mediation Time-varying signal 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to acknowledge Dr. F. X. Garcia Belmonte for fruitful discussions on the cultural tradition concept, and its relation to scientific practices.

References

  1. Bell, L., Juersivich, N., Hammond, T. C., & Bell, R. L. (2012). The TPACK of dynamic representations. In R. N. Ronau, C. R. Rakes, & M. L. Niess (Eds.), Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches. IGI Global: Hershay, PA. doi: 10.4018/978-1-60960-750-0.ch005.Google Scholar
  2. Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1–28. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00073-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and english speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burke, P. (1978). Popular culture in early modern Europe. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  5. Burke, P. (2009). Cultural hybridity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  6. Candela, A. (2010). Time and space: Undergraduate Mexican physics in motion. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 701–727. doi: 10.1007/s11422-010-9259-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clark, J. M., & Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory and education. Educational Psychology Review, 3, 149–170. doi: 10.1007/BF01320076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Contero, M., Naya, F., Company, P., Saorín, J. L., & Conesa, J. (2005). Improving visualization skills in engineering education. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. doi: 10.1109/MCG.2005.107.Google Scholar
  9. Crosby, A. W. (1997). The measure of reality: Quantification and western society, 1250–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dias Pereira, J. M. (2006). The history and technology of oscilloscopes: An overview of its primary characteristics and working principles. IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Magazine. doi: 10.1109/MIM.2006.250640.Google Scholar
  11. Doane, M. A. (2002). The emergence of the cinematic time: Modernity, contingency, the archive. Cambirdge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Fuhrman, O., McCormick, K., Chen, E., Jiang, H., Shu, D., Mao, S., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35, 1305–1328. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2011.01193.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gale, R. (Ed.). (1967). The philosphy of time. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  14. Gale, R. (1968). The language of time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Galison, P. (1997). Image and logic: A material culture of microphysics. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  17. Gell, A. (1992). The anthropology of time. Providence: Berg Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Gentner, D., Imai, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2002). As time goes by: Evidence for two systems in processing space-time metaphors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(5), 537–565. doi: 10.1080/01690960143000317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giaquinto, M. (2007). Visual thinking in mathematics: An epistemology study. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199285945.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilbert, J. K. (2007a). Visualization: A metacognitive skill in science and science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Gilbert, J. K. (Ed.). (2007b). Visualization in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Gilbert, J. K., Reiner, M., & Nakhleh, M. (Eds.). (2008). Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (Vol. 3). New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5.Google Scholar
  23. Granet, M. (1968). La Pensée Chinoise. Paris: Albin Michel.Google Scholar
  24. Graves-Brown, P. M. (Ed.). (2000). Matter, materiality and modern culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. Hammer, D. (1996). More than misconceptions: Multiple perspective in student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropiate role for education research. American Journal of Physics, 64, 1316–1325. doi: 10.1119/1.18376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Headrick, D. N. (2000). When information come of age: Technologies of knowledge in the age of reason and revolution, 1700–1850. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Idhe, D. (1991). Instrumental realism: The interface between philosophy of science and philosophy of technology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  30. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Latour, B. (1990). Drawing things together. In M. Lynch & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice (pp. 19–68). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lindberg, D. C. (1992). The beginnings of Western science: The European scientific tradition in philosophical, religious, and institutional context, 600 B.C. to 1450. Chicago: The University of Chigaco Press. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226482064.001.0001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lowe, R. K., & Schnotz, W. (Eds.). (2007). Learning with animation: Research implications for design. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. McKagan, S. B., Perkins, K. K., Dubson, M., Malley, C., Reid, S., LeMaster, R., & Wieman, C. E. (2008). Developing and researching PhET simulations for teaching quantum mechanics. American Journal of Physics, 76, 406–417. doi: 10.1119/1.2885199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Munn, N. D. (1992). The cultural anthropology of time: A critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology, 21, 93–123. doi: 10.1146/annurev.an.21.100192.000521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nespor, J. (1994). Knowledge in motion: Space, time and curriculum in undergraduate physics and management. London, New York: Routledge Farmer.Google Scholar
  38. Nespor, J. (2004). Educational scale-making. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 12, 309–326. doi: 10.1080/14681360400200205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Núñez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30, 401–450. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phillips, L. M., Norris, S. P., & Macnab, J. S. (2010). Visualization in mathematics, reading and science education. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-8816-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rapp, D. N. (2007). Mentals models: Theoretical issues for visualizations in science education. In J. K. Gilbert (Ed.), Visualization in science education. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  42. Rapp, D. N., & Kurby, C. A. (2008). The ‘ins’ and ‘outs’ of learning: Internal representations and external visualizations. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4020-5267-5_2.Google Scholar
  43. Roth, W.-M., Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Han, J. Y. (2005). Critical graphicacy: Understanding visual representation practices in school science. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  44. Sahlins, M. (1985). Islands of history. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Schiffer, M. B. (1999). The material life of human beings. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Sewell, W. H, Jr. (1999). The concept(s) of culture. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture (pp. 35–61). Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  47. Torralbo, A., Santiago, J., & Lupiáñez, J. (2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745–757. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0000_67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tversky, B., Morrison, J. B., & Betrancourt, M. (2002). Animation: Can it facilitate? International Journal of Human Computer Systems, 57, 247–262. doi: 10.1006/ijhc.2002.1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu, H. K., & Shah, P. (2004). Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning. Science Education, 88, 465–492. doi: 10.1002/sce.10126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsUniversitat Jaume ICastellóSpain

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options