Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 11, Issue 2, pp 253–272 | Cite as

Science initial teacher education and superdiversity: educating science teachers for a multi-religious and globalised science classroom

  • Roussel De Carvalho
Original Paper
First Online:

Abstract

Steven Vertovec (2006, 2007) has recently offered a re-interpretation of population diversity in large urban centres due to a considerable increase in immigration patterns in the UK. This complex scenario called superdiversity has been conceptualised to help illuminate significant interactions of variables such as religion, language, gender, age, nationality, labour market and population distribution on a larger scale. The interrelationships of these themes have fundamental implications in a variety of community environments, but especially within our schools. Today, London schools have over 300 languages being spoken by students, all of whom have diverse backgrounds, bringing with them a wealth of experience and, most critically, their own set of religious beliefs. At the same time, Science is a compulsory subject in England’s national curriculum, where it requires teachers to deal with important scientific frameworks about the world; teaching about the origins of the universe, life on Earth, human evolution and other topics, which are often in conflict with students’ religious views. In order to cope with this dynamic and thought-provoking environment, science initial teacher education (SITE)—especially those catering large urban centres—must evolve to equip science teachers with a meaningful understanding of how to handle a superdiverse science classroom, taking the discourse of inclusion beyond its formal boundaries. Thus, this original position paper addresses how the role of SITE may be re-conceptualised and re-framed in light of the immense challenges of superdiversity as well as how science teachers, as enactors of the science curriculum, must adapt to cater to these changes. This is also the first in a series of papers emerging from an empirical research project trying to capture science teacher educators’ own views on religio-scientific issues and their positions on the place of these issues within science teacher education and the science classroom.

Keywords

Superdiversity Science and religion Initial teacher education Science teacher educator beliefs Controversial science curricula 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aikenhead, G. S. (1996). Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education, 27(1), 1–52. doi: 10.1080/03057269608560077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (2001). Students’ ease in crossing cultural borders in school science. Science Education, 85(2), 180–188. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200103)85:2<180:AID-SCE50>3.0.CO;2-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G. S., & Jegede, O. (1999). Cross-cultural science education: A cognitive explanation of a cultural phenomenon. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(3), 269–287. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199903)36:3<269:AID-TEA3>3.0.CO;2T.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alsop, S. (2005). Beyond cartesian dualism: Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/1-4020-3808-9_1.Google Scholar
  5. Arnaut, K. (2012). Super-diversity: Elements of an emerging perspective. Diversities, 14(2), 1–15.Google Scholar
  6. Barbour, I. G. (1990). Religion in an age of science. London: SCM.Google Scholar
  7. Bausor, J., & Poole, M. (2003). Science and religion in the agreed syllabuses—an investigation and some suggestions. British Journal of Religious Education, 25(1), 18–32. doi: 10.1080/0141620020250103-&gt.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BBC (2008). Tests ‘damaging’ to school system. BBC News online. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7396623.stm Accessed 24 May 2014.
  9. Bernstein, B. (1971). On the classification and framing of educational knowledge. In M. Young (Ed.), Knowledge and control: New directions for the sociology of education (pp. 47–69). London: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Billingsley, B., Riga, F., Taber, K. S., & Newdick, H. (2014). Secondary school teachers’ perspectives on teaching about topics that bridge science and religion. The Curriculum Journal, 25(3), 372–395. doi: 10.1080/09585176.2014.920264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brickhouse, N., Dagher, Z., Letts, I., William, J., & Shipman, H. (2000). Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(4), 340–362. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(200004)37:4<340:AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-D.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cantor, G., & Kenny, C. (2001). Barbour’s fourfold way: Problems with his taxonomy of science-religion relationships. Zygon, 36(4), 765–781. doi: 10.1111/0591-2385.00395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clement, P., Quessada, M., Laurent, C. and Carvalho, G. (2008). Science and religion: evolutionism and creationism in education: a survey of teachers conceptions in 14 countries. (online) Paper presented at: XIII IOSTE Symposium, Izmir (Turkey), 21–26 September 2008. Retrieved from http://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/8934/1/IOSTE_Evolution.pdf Accessed 27 May 2014.
  14. Cobern, W., & Loving, C. (2001). Defining” science” in a multicultural world: Implications for science education. Science Education, 85(1), 50–67. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200101)85:1<50:AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Collins, S. and Reiss, M. and Stobart, G. (2009) The effects of national testing in science at Key Stage 2 in England and Wales. Executive Summary. Commissioned by The Wellcome Trust in association with the ASE. Retrieved from http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_peda/documents/web_document/wtd039972.pdf Accessed 20 May 2014.
  16. Dagher, Z., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34(5), 429–445. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199705)34:5<429:AID-TEA2>3.0.CO;2-S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dawkins, R. (2006). The god delusion (1st ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  18. De Carvalho, R. (2013). The Big Bang theory—coping with multi-religious beliefs in the super-diverse science classroom. School Science Review, 95(350), 119–126.Google Scholar
  19. De Saint-Georges, I. (2013). Multilingualism, multimodality and the future of education research. In De Saint-Georges, I., & Weber, J-J. (Eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality: Current challenges for educational studies (pp. 1–8). New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-266-2.
  20. DfE (Department for Education) (2010). The schools’ white paper 2010—the importance of teaching. London: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/175429/CM-7980.pdf Accessed 23 May 2014.
  21. DfE (Department for Education) (2013). Science—GCSE content and assessment objectives. London: Department for Education. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/211219/GCSE_Sciences_final_updated.pdf Accessed 23 May 2014.
  22. Dodick, J., Dayan, A., & Orion, N. (2010). Philosophical approaches of religious Jewish science teachers toward the teaching of ‘controversial’ topics in science. International Journal of Science Education, 32(11), 1521–1548. doi: 10.1080/09500690903518060.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Downie, R. J., & Barron, N. J. (2000). Evolution and religion: Attitudes of Scottish first year biology and medical students to the teaching of evolutionary biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34(3), 139–146. doi: 10.1080/00219266.2000.9655704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. El-Hani, C., & Sepulveda, C. (2010). The relationships between science and religion in the education of protestant biology preservice teachers in a Brazilian university. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5(1), 103–125. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9212-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eurydice (2013). Key data on teachers and school leaders in Europe. 2013 Edition. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  26. Ferguson, J., & Kameniar, B. (2014). Is ‘learning’ science enough? A cultural model of religious students of science in an Australian government school. International Journal of Science Education, Published online on 1st April 2014, 1–26. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2014.904060#tabModule Accessed 21 May 2014. doi.org/ 10.1080/09500693.2014.904060.
  27. Fysh, R., & Lucas, K. (1998). Religious beliefs in science classrooms. Research in Science Education, 28(4), 399–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gay, G. (2010). Acting on beliefs in teacher education for cultural diversity. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 143–152. doi: 10.1177/0022487109347320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gogolin, I. (2011). The challenge of super diversity for education in Europe. Education Inquiry, 2(2), 239–249. doi: 10.3402/edui.v2i2.21976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gove, M. (2013) Speech: Michael Gove speaks about the importance of teaching. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/michael-gove-speaks-about-the-importance-of-teaching Accessed 20 May 2014.
  31. Hagger, H., & McIntyre, D. (2006). Learning about teaching from teachers. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hanley, P., Bennett, J., & Ratcliffe, M. (2014). The Inter-relationships of science and religion: A typology of engagement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(7), 1210–1229. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2013.853897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hipkins, R., Barker, M., & Bolstad, R. (2005). Teaching the ‘nature of science’: Modest adaptations or radical reconceptions? International Journal of Science Education, 27(2), 243–254. doi: 10.1080/0950069042000276758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kegan, R. (2009). What ‘form’ transforms? A constructive-developmental approach to transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists… in their own words (pp. 35–52). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Kingston, A., Day, C., Simmons, P., Regan, E., Brown, E., & Gunraj, J. (2012). What makes teachers effective? Profiles of innovative classroom practice. In C. Day (Ed.), The routeldge international handbook of teacher and school development (1st ed., pp. 319–334). Abingdon, Oxon: Routeldge.Google Scholar
  36. Kim, S. Y., & Nehm, R. H. (2011). A cross‐cultural comparison of Korean and American science teachers’ views of evolution and the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 197–227. doi: 10.1080/09500690903563819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu, S., & Lederman, N. (2007). Exploring prospective teachers’ worldviews and conceptions of nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(10), 1281–1307. doi: 10.1080/09500690601140019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Loving, C., & Foster, A. (2000). The religion-in-the-science-classroom issue: Seeking graduate student conceptual change. Science Education, 84(4), 445–468. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200007)84:4<445:AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mansour, N. (2008). Religious beliefs: A hidden variable in the performance of science teachers in the classroom. European Educational Research Journal, 7(4), 557–576. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2008.7.4.557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mansour, N. (2011). Science teachers’ views of science and religion vs. the Islamic perspective: Conflicting or compatible? Science Education, 95(2), 281–309. doi: 10.1002/sce.20418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Martin-Hansen, L. (2008). First-year college students’ conflict with religion and science. Science & Education, 17(4), 317–357. doi: 10.1007/s11191-006-9039-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mezirow, J. (2009). An overview on transformative learning. In K. Illeris (Ed.), Contemporary theories of learning: Learning theorists … in their own words (pp. 90–105). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Millar, R., & Abrahams, I. (2009). Practical work: Making it more effective. School Science Review, 91(334), 59–64.Google Scholar
  44. Milner, H. (2010). What does teacher education have to do with teaching? Implications for diversity studies. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 118–131. doi: 10.1177/0022487109347670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Newton, D. P. (1988). Making science education relevant. London: Kogan Page Ltd.Google Scholar
  46. OFSTED, (2013). Ofsted | Maintaining curiosity: A survey into science education in schools. (online). Retrieved from: http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/maintaining-curiosity-survey-science-education-schools Accessed 21 May 2014.
  47. Ozdemir, G., & Clark, D. (2007). An overview of conceptual change theories. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 3(4), 351–361.Google Scholar
  48. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and education research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Education Research, 62(3), 307–332. doi: 10.3102/00346543062003307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Phelan, P., Davidson, A. L., & Cao, H. T. (1991). Students’ multiple worlds: Negotiating the boundaries of family, peer and school cultures. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 22, 224–250. doi: 10.1525/aeq.1991.22.3.05x1051k.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227. doi: 10.1002/sce.3730660207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reiss, M. (2008). Should science educators deal with the science/religion issue? Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 157–186. doi: 10.1080/03057260802264214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Reiss, M. (2011). How should creationism and intelligent design be dealt with in the classroom? Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(3), 399–415. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9752.2011.00790.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Roth, W. (1997). The interaction of students’ scientific and religious discourses: Two case studies. International Journal of Science Education, 19(2), 125–146. doi: 10.1080/0950069970190201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. SCORE (2008) Practical work in science: A report and proposal for a strategic framework. Science community representing education report. December 2008. Retrieved from http://score-education.org/media/3668/report.pdf Accessed 20 May 2014.
  55. Shepherd, J. (2010, August 13). Pupils do better at school if teachers are not fixated on test results. The Guardian online. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2010/aug/13/exam-test-results-teaching-style Accessed 25 May 2014.
  56. Shipman, H., Brickhouse, N., Dagher, Z., & Letts, W. (2002). Changes in student views of religion and science in a college astronomy course. Science Education, 86(4), 526–547. doi: 10.1002/sce.1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Reseach in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528. doi: 10.1002/tea.10087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stolberg, T. (2007). The Religio-scientific frameworks of pre-service primary teachers: An analysis of their influence on their teaching of science. International Journal of Science Education, 29(7), 909–930. doi: 10.1080/09500690600924934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sutherland, D., & Dennick, R. (2002). Exploring culture, language and the perception of the nature of science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(1), 1–25. doi: 10.1080/09500690110067011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Taber, K., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2011). Secondary students’ responses to perceptions of the relationships between science and religion: Stances identified from an interview study. Science Education, 95(6), 1000–1025. doi: 10.1002/sce.20459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. The Guardian (2006, July 20). Too many teachers ‘teaching to the test’. The Guardian Online. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/education/2006/jul/20/schools.uk5 Accessed 23 May 2014.
  62. The Telegraph (2008). Ofsted: Schools ‘teaching to the test’. The Telegraph online. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/2440091/Ofsted-Schools-teaching-to-the-test.html Accessed 22 May 2014.
  63. The telegraph (2010). Sats exams promote ‘teaching to the test’. The Telegraph online. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/education/educationnews/7559726/Sats-exams-promote-teaching-to-the-test.html Accessed 24 May 2014.
  64. Trani, R. (2004). I won’t teach evolution. It’s against my religion. And now for the rest of the story. The American Biology Teacher, 66(6), 419–427. doi: 10.2307/4451708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vertovec, S. (2006). The emergence of super-diversity in Britain. Centre on migration, policy and society—working paper No 25. COMPAS - University of Oxford. Retrieved from https://www.compas.ox.ac.uk/fileadmin/files/Publications/working_papers/WP_2006/WP0625_Vertovec.pdf Accessed 26 May 2014.
  66. Vertovec, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and racial studies, 30(6), 1024–1054. doi: 10.1080/01419870701599465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Von Ahn, M.,Lupton, R.,Greenwood, C., & Wiggins, D. (2010). Languages, ethnicities and education in London. DoQSS working paper No.10–12. Department of Quantitative Social Science, Institute of Education, University of London. Retrieved from http://repec.ioe.ac.uk/REPEc/pdf/qsswp1012.pdf Accessed 20 May 2014.
  68. Waldrip, B. G., Timothy, J. T., & Wilikai, W. (2007). Pedagogic principles in negotiating cultural conflict: A melanesian example. International Journal of Science Education, 29(1), 101–122. doi: 10.1080/09500690600718195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wasicsko, M. M., Wirtz, P., & Resor, C. (2009). Using dispositions in the teacher admission process. SRATE Journal, 18(2), 19–26.Google Scholar
  70. Wellington, J., & Osborne, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education (1st ed.). Buckingham: Open University.Google Scholar
  71. Woods, A., & Luke, A. (2012). Innovative pedagogies. In C. Day (Ed.), The Routledge International Handbook of Teacher and School Development (1st ed., pp. 313–318). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  72. Yasri, P., & Mancy, R. (2014). Understanding student approaches to learning evolution in the context of their perceptions of the relationships between science and religion. International Journal of Science Education, 36(1), 24–45. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2012.715315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Curriculum, Pedagogy and AssessmentUCL Institute of EducationLondonUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options