Evolution of self-reporting methods for identifying discrete emotions in science classrooms
Emotion researchers have grappled with challenging methodological issues in capturing emotions of participants in naturalistic settings such as school or university classrooms. Self-reporting methods have been used frequently, yet these methods are inadequate when used alone. We argue that the self-reporting methods of emotion diaries and cogenerative dialogues can be helpful in identifying in-the-moment emotions when used in conjunction with the microanalysis of video recordings of classroom events. We trace the evolution of our use of innovative self-reporting methods through three cases from our research projects, and propose new directions for our ongoing development and application of these methods in both school and university classrooms.
KeywordsEmotion Self-reporting Methods Classroom research
Contract grant sponsor: Australian Research Council, Contract grant numbers: DP1210369 and LP110200368.
- Bellocchi, A., Ritchie, S. M., Tobin, K., King, D., Sandhu, M., & Henderson, S. (2013a, April). The production of emotional climate in pre-service science teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico, 5–9 April 2013.Google Scholar
- Darwin, C. (1890). The expression of emotions in man and animals. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P. (2004). Emotions revealed. Understanding faces and feelings. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1975). Unmasking the face. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1978). The facial action coding system: A technique for the measurement of facial movement. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologist Press.Google Scholar
- Gleaves, A., & Walker, C. (2010). Student teachers’ situated emotions: A study of how electronic communication facilitates their expression and shapes their impact on novice teacher development during practice placements. Teacher Development, 14(2), 139–152. doi: 10.1080/13664530.2010.494498.
- Kanyangara, P., Rime, B., Philippot, P., & Yzerbyt, V. (2007). Collective rituals, emotional climate and intergroup perception: Participation in “Gacaca” tribunals and assimilation of the Rwandan genocide. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 387–403. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00515.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- O’Regan, K. (2003). Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous Network Learning, 7(3), 78–92.Google Scholar
- Pekrun, R., & Schutz, P. A. (2011). Where do we go from here? Implications and future directions for inquiry on emotions in education. In G. D. Phye, P. A. Schutz, & R. Pekrun (Eds.), Emotion in education (pp. 313–331). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Ritchie, S. M., & Tomas, L. (2013). Designing an innovative approach to engage students in learning science. The evolving case of hybridized writing. In L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The Routledge international handbook of innovative education (pp. 385–395). Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Rozin, P., Haidt, J., & McCauley, C. R. (2008). Disgust. In M. Lewis & J. Havilland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (3rd ed., pp. 2200–2262). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Schutz, P. A., & Pekrun, R. (Eds.). (2007). Emotion in education. Amsterdam: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Tobin, K., & Ritchie, S. M. (2012). Multi-method, multi-theoretic, multi-level research in the learning sciences. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21, 117–129.Google Scholar
- Tobin, K., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Coteaching/cogenerative dialoguing in an urban science teacher preparation program. In W.-M. Roth & K. Tobin (Eds.), Teaching together, learning together (pp. 59–77). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
- Turner, J. H. (2002). Face to face. Toward a theory of interpersonal behavior. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar