Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 8, Issue 4, pp 759–776 | Cite as

“Yo soy indígena”: identifying and using traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) to make the teaching of science culturally responsive for Maya girls

  • Maria L. HamlinEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study examines how traditional ecological knowledge—TEK—can be identified and utilized to create culturally responsive science learning opportunities for Maya girls from a community in the Guatemalan highlands. Maya girls are situated in a complex socio-historical and political context rooted in racism and sexism. This study contextualizes the current situation of Maya women and girls in Guatemala and emphasizes the important need for educators to create science-learning opportunities that are culturally congruent. The author posits that when considering how to make the teaching and learning of science culturally responsive for Maya girls, educators must begin with the scientific knowledge inherent within Maya communities. Indigenous communities have a wealth of TEK that can be used to contextualize science curricula that can be purposely designed to meet the nuanced cultural needs of traditional Maya girls within and outside Guatemala.

Keywords

Gender Traditional ecological knowledge Science education Guatemala 

References

  1. Absolon, K., & Willett, C. (2004). Aboriginal research: Berry picking and hunting in the 21st Century* first peoples child & family review. A Journal on Innovation and Best Practices in Aboriginal Child Welfare Administration, Research, Policy and Practice, 1, 5–17.Google Scholar
  2. Aikenhead, G. S. (1997). Toward a First Nations cross-cultural science and technology curriculum. Science Education, 81, 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aikenhead, G., & Michell, H. (2011). Bridging cultures: Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing nature. Toronto, Canada: Pearson.Google Scholar
  4. Allchin, D. (1999). Values in science: An educational perspective. Science & Education, 8(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beck, D. (2004). Playing games or learning science? An inquiry into Navajo children’s science learning. Journal of American Indian Education, 43(3), 41–55.Google Scholar
  6. Brayboy, B. M. J., & Castagno, A. E. (2008). How might Native science inform “informal science learning”? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 731–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cajete, G. A. (1999). Igniting the sparkle: An indigenous science education model. Skyland, NC: Kivaki Press.Google Scholar
  8. Castillo, R. A. H. (2010). The emergence of indigenous feminism in Latin America. Signs, 35, 539–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chavajay, P., & Rogoff, B. (2002). Schooling and traditional collaborative social organization of problem solving by Maya mothers and children. Developmental Psychology, 38, 55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chiu, M. H., & Duit, R. (2011). Globalization: Science education from an international perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 553–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chu, H., & Rubel, L. H. (2010). Learning to teach mathematics in urban high schools: Untangling the threads of interwoven narratives. Journal of Urban Mathematics Education, 3(2), 57–76.Google Scholar
  12. Colby, J. M. (2011). The business of empire: United fruit, race, and US Expansion in Central America. Itahaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Crosby, A., & Lykes, M. B. (2011). Maya women survivors speak: The gendered relations of truth telling in postwar Guatemala. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5, 456–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demmert, W. G. (2001). Improving academic performance among Native American students: A review of the research literature. ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. Washington, DC: Sponsoring Agency is Office of Educational Research and Improvement (ED).Google Scholar
  15. Denzin, N., Lincoln, Y., & Smith, T. (2008). Handbook of critical and indigenous methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  16. Doyle, K. (2012). Justice in Guatemala. NACLA: Report on the Americas, 45(1), 37–42.Google Scholar
  17. Geertz, C. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. Culture: critical concepts in sociology, 1, 173–196.Google Scholar
  18. Gomez-Baggethun, E., Mingorria, S., Reyes Garcia, V., Calvet, L., & Montes, C. (2010). Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in the Donana natural areas. Conservation Biology, 24, 721–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hallman, K., Peracca, S., & Ruiz, M. J. (2007). Indigenous girls in Guatemala: Poverty and location. In M. Lewis & M. E. Lockheed (Eds.), Exclusion, gender and education: Case studies from the developing world (pp. 145–175). Washington DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  20. Kanakarajavelu, N. (2010). Legacy of Repression: Violence against women in post-conflict Guatemala (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.Google Scholar
  21. Kovach, M. (2005). Emerging from the margins: Indigenous methodologies. In S. Strega & L. Brown (Eds.), Research as resistance—critical, indigenous and anti-oppressive approaches (pp. 19–36). Toronto: Canadian Scholars Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, M., & Lockheed, M. (2008). Social exclusion and the gender gap in education. Policy Research Working Paper 4562. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  23. Mack, E., Augare, H., Different Cloud-Jones, L., Davíd, D., Quiver Gaddie, H., Honey, R. E., et al. (2012). Effective practices for creating transformative informal science education programs grounded in Native ways of knowing. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 7, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. McGraw, J. (August, 2008). http://www.tzununya.com/. In Tz'unun Ya'. Retrieved October, 24, 2012, from http://www.tzununya.com/about%20us/tzunun.htm.
  25. McKinley, E. (2007). Postcolonialism, indigenous students, and science education. In S. Abell & N. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook on research in science education (pp. 199–226). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  26. Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into practice, 31(2), 132–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Price, M. W. (2011). Indigenous taxonomy, ethnobotany and sacred names. In P. Boyer (Ed.), Ancient wisdom, modern science: The integration of native knowledge at tribally controlled Colleges and Universities (pp. 1–14). Lincoln, NE: Salish Kootenai College Press.Google Scholar
  28. Rogoff, B., Paradise, R., Arauz, R. M., Correa-Chavez, M., & Angelillo, C. (2003). Firsthand learning through intent participation. Annual review of psychology, 54(1), 175–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shapiro, J. (2005). Guatemala. In G. Hall & H. Patrinos (Eds.), Indigenous peoples, poverty and human development in Latin America 1994–2004 (pp. 106–169). Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  30. Sieder, R. (1997). Reframing citizenship: Indigenous rights, local power and the peace process in Guatemala. London, UK: Accord.Google Scholar
  31. Siegel, H. (2002). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education: In search of common ground. Science Education, 86, 803–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith, L. (2000). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  33. Thomas, J. (1993). Doing critical mini-ethnography. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  34. Zent, S. (2008). Methodology for developing a vitality index of traditional environmental knowledge (VITEK). Technical report to the Christensen fund. Salt Spring Island, British Columbia: Terralingua.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curriculum and Instruction, School of EducationUniversity of Wisconsin–MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations