Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 643–648 | Cite as

A problem masked

Forum

Abstract

While Ester Aflalo’s conclusions for teaching the nature of science seem uncontentious her analysis of degree of religiosity and its relationship to perceptions of the nature of science among Palestinian Muslim and Jewish Israelis fails to take into account complex affiliations to religion such as history, the nature of identity and resistance to political oppression. My response is that the focus on religion and science, while important, can obscure subtle relationships between worldviews and perceptions of the nature of science. Analysis of this latter relationship may be more fruitful in supporting transformative science teaching.

Keywords

Religion Creationism Nature of science 

References

  1. Arendt, H. (1978). The Jew as pariah: Jewish identity and politics in the modern age. New York: Gove Press.Google Scholar
  2. Dagher, Z. R., & BouJaoude, S. (2011). Science education in Arab states: Bright future or status quo? Studies in Science Education, 47, 73–101. doi:10.1080/03057267.2011.549622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Donnelly, J. (2004). Humanising science education. Science Education, 88, 762–784. doi:10.1002/sce.20004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edis, T. (2009). Modern science and conservative Islam: An uneasy relationship. In M. Matthews (Ed.), Science, worldviews and education (pp. 237–256). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Gould, S. J. (1999). Rocks of ages: Science and religion in the fullness of life. New York: Ballantine.Google Scholar
  6. Israel, J. (2011). A revolution of the mind: Radical Enlightenment and the intellectual origins of modern democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, L. S., & Reiss, M. J. (Eds.). (2007). Teaching about scientific origins: Taking account of creationism. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  8. Leevers, H. (2007). BBC News. Retrieved 01 Dec 2012 from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/7028639.stm.
  9. Levi, P. (1990). Other people’s trades. New York: Summit books.Google Scholar
  10. Levinson, R. (2012). Comentario sobre las narrativas de Sandra y Sergio. In P. Reis & N. Climent (Eds.), Narrativas de profesores: Reflexiones en torno al desarrollo personal y professional (pp. 48–51). Sevilla: Universidad Internacional de Andalucia.Google Scholar
  11. Levinson, R., & Turner, S. (2001). Valuable lessons. London: The Wellcome Trust.Google Scholar
  12. Matthews, M. (2009). Science and worldviews in the classroom: Joseph Priestley and photosynthesis. In M. Matthews (Ed.), Science, worldviews and education (pp. 271–302). Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-2779-5_14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Midgley, M. (1992). Science as salvation: A modern myth and its meaning. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Neslen, A. (2011). In your eyes a sandstorm: Ways of being Palestinian. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Reiss, M. J. (2010). Science and religion: Implications for science educators. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 91–101. doi:10.1007/s11422-009-9211-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sacks, J. (2011). The great partnership: God, science and the search for meaning. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  17. Sutton, C. (1992). Words, science and learning. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of EducationUniversity of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations