Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 1037–1044 | Cite as

Reality is broken to be rebuilt: how a gamer’s mindset can show science educators new ways of contribution to science and world?

Book Review

Abstract

This paper presents a review of Jane McGonigal’s book, “Reality is broken” (Reality is broken: why games make us better and how they can change the world. Penguin Press, New York, 2011). As the book subtitle suggests it is a book about “why games make us better and how they can change the world”, written by a specialist in computer game design. I will try to show the relevance this book might have to science educators through emphasizing the points that the author offers as the fixes to rebuild reality on the image of gaming world. Using cultural-historical activity theory, I will explore how taking up a gamer mindset can challenge one to consider shortcomings in current approaches to the activity of teaching–learning science and how using this mindset can open our minds to think of new ways of engaging in the activity of doing science. I hope this review will encourage educators to explore the worldview presented in the book and use it to transform our thinking about science education.

Keywords

Games Cultural-historical activity theory Contribution Gamification 

References

  1. Anderman, E. M., & Young, A. J. (1994). Motivation and strategy use in science: Individual differences and classroom effects. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 811–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barab, S., Thomas, M., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53, 86–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Csikzentmihaly, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  4. Dickey, M. D. (2007). Game design and learning: A conjectural analysis of how massively multiple online role-playing games (MMORPGs) foster intrinsic motivation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55, 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Engeström, Y. (1991). Non scolae sed vitae discimus: Toward overcoming the encapsulation of school learning. Learning and instruction, 1, 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Engeström, Y. (1999). Expansive visibilization of work: An activity-theoretical perspective. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 8, 63–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  8. Kirch, S. A. (2007). Re/Production of science process skills and a scientific ethos in an early childhood classroom. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 785–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. McGonigal, J. (2011). Reality is broken: Why games make us better and how they can change the world. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  10. Neathery, M. F. (1997). Elementary and secondary students’ perceptions toward science: Correlations with gender, ethnicity, ability, grade, and science achievement. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 2(1).Google Scholar
  11. Sewell, W. H. (1992). A theory of structure: Duality, agency, and transformation. American Journal of Sociology, 98, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Squire, K. (2002). Cultural framing of computer/video games. Game studies, 2, 90.Google Scholar
  13. Steinkuehler, C. A. (2006). Massively multiplayer online video gaming as participation in a discourse. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13, 38–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance on development and learning: Expanding Vygotsky’s(CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 471–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Stetsenko, A. (2010). Teaching and learning and development as activist projects of historical becoming: Expanding Vygotsky’s approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5, 6–16.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Teaching and Learning, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education and, Human DevelopmentNew York UniversityNew York CityUSA

Personalised recommendations