Abstract
This paper attempts to add to the multifaceted discussion concerning neoliberalism and globalization out of two Cultural Studies of Science Education journal issues along with the recent Journal of Research in Science Teaching devoted to these topics. However, confronting the phenomena of globalization and neoliberalism will demand greater engagement with relevant sociopolitical thought in fields typically outside the purview of science education. Drawing from thinkers Michel Foucault, Jean Baudrillard, Judith Butler, and Louis Althusser this paper attempts to extend some key ideas coming from Ken Tobin, Larry Bencze, and Lyn Carter and advocates science educators taking up notions of ideology, discourse, and subjectivity to engage globalization and neoliberalism. Subjectivity (and its constitution in science education) is considered alongside two relevant textbook examples and also in terms of its importance in formulating political and culturally relevant questions in science education.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Althusser, L. (1998). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In J. Rivkin & M. Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory, an anthology (pp. 294–304). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. New York: Hill and Wang.
Barthes, R. (1981). Camera lucida: Reflections on photography. New York: Hill and Wang.
Baudrillard, J. (1993). Symbolic exchange and death. London: Sage.
Baudrillard, J. (1998). The consumer society. London: Sage.
Bencze, J. L. (2008). Private profit, science and science education: Critical problems and possibilities for action. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 8, 297–312.
Bencze, J. L., & Carter, L. (2011). Globalizing students acting for the common good. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 648–669.
Bencze, L., Sperling, E., & Carter, L. (2012). Students’ research-informed socio-scientific activism: Re/visions for a sustainable future. Research in Science Education, 42, 129–148.
Blades, D. W. (1997). Procedures of power and curriculum change: Foucault and the quest for possibilities in science education. New York: P. Lang.
Bourdieu, P. (1998). On television. New York: New Press.
Bruna, K. R. (2009). Jesús and María in the jungle: An essay on possibility and constraint in the third-shift third space. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 221–237.
Butler, J. (1995). Contingent foundations. In S. Benhabib (Ed.), Feminist contentions: a philosophical exchange (pp. 35–58). New York: Routledge.
Carr, C. (2003). Nelson biology 12. Toronto: Thomson Nelson.
Carter, L. (2011a). Science education and globalisation (Lecture). Presented at: OISE/University of Toronto (SMT series).
Carter, L. (2011b). Gathering in threads in the insensible global world: The wicked problem of globalisation and science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 1–12.
Carter, L. (Ed.), (2011c). Globalization and science education: global and local issues. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 1–12.
Chie, M. H., & Duit, R. (2011). Special issue on globalization in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 553–710.
Davies, B. (2006). Subjectification: The relevance of Butler’s analysis for education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 27, 425–438.
DiGiuseppe, M. (2003). Nelson biology 12. Canada: Nelson Thomson Learning.
Fensham, P. (2011). Globalization of science education: Comment and a commentary. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 698–709.
Feyerabend, P. (1987). Farewell to reason. London: Verso.
Fiske, J. (1998). Culture, ideology and interpellation. In J. Rivkin & M. Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory, an anthology (pp. 305–311). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge (1st American ed.). New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. In: H. L. Dreyfus & P. Rabinow (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (pp. 208–226). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1984). What is enlightenment? In: P. Rabinow (Ed.), The Foucault reader (pp. 32–50). New York: Pantheon.
Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Foucault, M. (1994). The subject and power. In J. Faubion, & M. Foucault (Eds.), Power (pp. 326–348). New York: The New Press.
Foucault, M., Rabinow, P., & Rose, N. S. (2003). The essential Foucault: Selections from essential works of Foucault, 1954–1984. New York: New Press.
Foucault, M., & Senellart, M. (2008). The birth of biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hall, S. (1995). Understanding modern societies: An introduction. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Harding, S. (2006). Science and social inequality: Feminist and postcolonial issues. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Hart, C. (2001). Examining relations of power in a process of curriculum change: The case of VCE Physics. Research in Science Education, 31, 525–551.
Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. London: Oxford University Press.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 645–670.
Jameson, F. (1991). Postmodernism, or, the cultural logic of late capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Jameson, F. (1994). The seeds of time. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lemke, J. (2011). The secret identity of science education: Masculine and politically conservative? Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 287–292.
Lyotard, J. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Martin, S. (Eds.), (2011). Science education in local/global contexts. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 263–273.
McLaren, P. (2000). Che Guevara, Paulo Freire, and the pedagogy of the revolution. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Mills, S. (1997). Discourse. London: Routledge.
Mills, S. (2003). Michel Foucault. London: Routledge.
Ninnes, P. (2002). Discursive space(s) in science curriculum materials in Canada, Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34, 557–570.
Norris, T. (2011). Consuming schools: Commercialism and the end of politics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Ontario Ministry of Education. (2008). The Ontario curriculum: grades 9 and 10. Retrieved on 15 September from, www.edu.gov.on.ca.
Popper, K. (1972). Objective knowledge; an evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Rasmussen, M. L., & Harwood, V. (2003). Performativity, youth and injurious speech. Teaching and Education, 14, 25–36.
Sandlin, J. (2004). Consumerism, consumption, and a critical consumer education for adults. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 102, 25–34.
Shumar, W. (2010). Homi Bhabha. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 5, 495–506.
Snyder, L., & Broadway, S. (2004). Queering high school biology textbooks. Journal of research in science teaching, 41, 617–636.
Tobin, K. (2011). Global reproduction and transformation of science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 6, 127–142.
Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (Student’s ed.). New York: Scribner.
University Corporation of Atmospheric Research. (n.d). Global learning and observations to benefit the environment. Retrieved from: http://globe.gov/.
Žižek, S. (2008). The sublime object of ideology (New ed.). London: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2011). Living in the end times (Rev. pbk. ed.). London: Verso.
Acknowledgements
I would like to thank Anastasios Siatras for the long hours spent talking about education, science, and the state of things.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bazzul, J. Neoliberal ideology, global capitalism, and science education: engaging the question of subjectivity. Cult Stud of Sci Educ 7, 1001–1020 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9413-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-012-9413-3