Science games and the development of scientific possible selves
- 498 Downloads
Serious scientific games, especially those that include a virtual apprenticeship component, provide players with realistic experiences in science. This article discusses how science games can influence learning about science and the development of science-oriented possible selves through repeated practice in professional play and through social influences (e.g., peer groups). We first review the theory of possible selves (Markus and Nurius 1986) and discuss the potential of serious scientific games for influencing the development of scientific possible selves. As part of our review, we present a forensic game that inspired our work. Next we present a measure of scientific possible selves and assess its reliability and validity with a sample of middle-school students (N = 374). We conclude by discussing the promise of science games and the development of scientific possible selves on both the individual and group levels as a means of inspiring STEM careers among adolescents.
KeywordsScientific possible selves Self-concept Science games Career development Science identity Transformative identity
- Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Holum, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship: Making thinking visible. American Educator, 6, 38–46.Google Scholar
- Foster, A. (2008). Games and motivation to learn science: Personal identity, applicability, relevance and meaningfulness. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19, 597–614.Google Scholar
- Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Holland, J. L. (1973). Making vocational choices: A theory of careers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Jenkins, H., Clinton, K., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Retrieved from the John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Website (http://digitallearning.macfound.org).
- Lamb, R. R., & Prediger, D. J. (1981). The Unisex edition of the ACT interest inventory. Iowa City, IA: American College Testing.Google Scholar
- Lee, J. J., & Hoadley, C. M. (2007). Leveraging identity to make learning fun: Possible selves and experiential learning in massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs). Innovate, 3. Retrieved from http://www.innovateoneline.info/index/php?view=article&id=348.
- Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among U.S. students. Science Education Policy. Advance online publication. doi:10.1002/sce20441.
- Shaffer, D. W., Squire, K. R., Halverson, R., & Gee, J. P. (2005). Video games on the future of learning. Wisconsin Center for Educational Research. Retrieved from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/publications/workingPapers/Working_Paper_No_2005_4.pdf.
- Shavelson, R. J., Hubner, J. J., & Stanton, G. C. (1976). Self-concept: Validation of construct interpretations. Review of Educational Research, 46, 407–441.Google Scholar
- Um, E., & deHaan, J. W. (2005). How video games can be used as an effective learning environment for cognitive apprenticeship theory-based learning. Retrieved from https://files.nyu.edu/eju202/public/Um_Dehaan2005GameCA_FULL.pdf.