Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 441–446 | Cite as

Looking through the lenses of science literacy and cultural diversity: learning from Helena’s mistake

  • Pauline W. U. ChinnEmail author
Forum

Abstract

Maria Andrée focuses on an immigrant student whose error in a laboratory activity leads to a novel, colorful outcome that she excitedly shares with peers. After engaging in class activities for a few weeks she returns to her earlier dislike of science, saying: "I hate science, particularly Chemistry." The classroom activity system focused on reproduction of school knowledge did not expand to accommodate Helena's “new activity system with an object of learning science.” This essay suggests teachers be prepared to teach diverse students in ways supporting multiple ways to engage in science. This becomes possible when teachers view their classrooms as dynamic, participatory activity systems that support content mastery as contributing to but not being identical to science identity and science literacy.

Keywords

Science literacy Cultural diversity Identity Discourse 

References

  1. Andrée, M. (2012). Altering conditions for student participation and motive development in school science: learning from Helena’s mistake. Cultural Studies of Science Education 6. doi: 10.1007/s11422-011-9314-x.
  2. Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist. Retrieved on May 15, 2008 from http://www.des.emory.edu/mfp.
  3. Chinn, P. (1998). Isabella Aiona Abbott and the education of minorities and females. Teaching Education, 10, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chinn, P. W. U., & Hana’ike, D. M. (2010). A case study of David, a native Hawaiian science teacher: Cultural historical activity theory and implications for teacher education. In D. Tippins, M. Mueller, & M. Eijck (Eds.), Cultural studies and environmentalism: The confluence of ecojustice, place-based (science) education, and indigenous knowledge systems (pp. 229–246). NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  5. Da Pidgin Coup (1999, November). Pidgin and education: A position paper. Retrieved August 26, 2011 from http://www.hawaii.edu/sls/pidgin.html.
  6. Engeström, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Toward an activity theoretical conceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14, 133–156.Google Scholar
  7. Gee, J. P. (1992). The social mind: Language, ideology and social practice. New York: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  8. Gee, J. P. (2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. In W. G. Secada (Ed.), Review of research in education, 25 (pp. 99–125). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  9. Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996a). Science literacy test items. Cape Town, SA: University of Cape Town.Google Scholar
  11. Laugksch, R. C., & Spargo, P. E. (1996b). Development of a pool of scientific literacy items based on selected AAAs literacy goals. Science Education, 80, 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loucks-Horsley, S., Stiles, K., & Hewson, P. (1996). Principles of effective professional development for mathematics and science education: A synthesis of standards. NISE Brief, 1, 1–6. Retrieved on June 9, 2008 from http://www.wcer.wisc.edu/archive/nise.
  13. Schwartz, Y., Ben-Zvi, R., & Hofstein, A. (2006). The use of scientific literacy taxonomy for assessing the development of chemical literacy among high-school students. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 7, 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. (2004). The self in cultural-historical activity theory: Reclaiming the unity of social and individual dimensions of human development. Theory & Psychology, 14, 475–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yore, L. D., & Treagust, D. F. (2006). Current realities and future possibilities: Language and science literacy–empowering research and informing instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 291–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curriculum StudiesUniversity of Hawaii at MānoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations