Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 287–292 | Cite as

The secret identity of science education: masculine and politically conservative?

  • Jay Lemke
Forum

Abstract

This response to Jesse Bazzul and Heather Sykes’ paper, The secret identity of a biology textbook: straight and naturally sexed, explores their critiques of textbooks and curricula that authoritatively present scientific accounts of the natural world without engaging students in critical thinking. It proposes that we need to go beyond such useful critiques to develop alternatives to the unsatisfactory heteronormative status quo in biology textbooks and in science education more generally.

Keywords

Sex Gender Sexuality Textbooks Ideology 

References

  1. Lemke, J. L. (1995). Textual politics: discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  2. Lemke, J. L. (1998a). Analysing verbal data: principles, methods, and problems. In K. Tobin & B. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1175–1189). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Lemke, J. L. (1998b). Multiplying meaning: visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading science (pp. 87–113). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Shapin, S., & Schaffer, S. (1989). Leviathan and the air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Comparative Human CognitionUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations