Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 5, Issue 4, pp 1009–1026 | Cite as

TEK talk: so what? Language and the decolonization of narrative gatekeepers of science education curriculum

  • Giuliano ReisEmail author
  • Nicholas Ng-A-Fook
Forum

Abstract

We provide a response to Michiel van Eijck and Wolff-Michael Roth’s article and Michael Mueller and Deborah Tippins’ rejoinder. As we adhere to the conversation, we hope to bring new insights on the matter of Traditional Ecological Knowledge and/in science education. As the title suggests, we divided the present commentary in two distinct but interconnected sections. The first section (Giuliano) deals with the limitations imposed by language in dealing with a possible amalgamation of TEK into the traditional school science curriculum and the threat that such a move would represent to the value of keeping them distinct from one another. The second section (Nicholas) touches on the unseen (or ignored?) perils of neglecting indigenous voices in the debate—which, in itself, corresponds to yet another limiting factor inherent to this forum. Also, the second section reports on a professional experience with B.Ed. students that speaks to the practical implications of the current discussion. Combined, the two sections seek to uncover the potential significance of the TEK-WMS discussion to different education actors beyond the non-aboriginal scholarly world.

Keywords

Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) Western modern science (WMS) Science curriculum Indigenousness Colonial frontier logics Post-colonial theory 

References

  1. Alfred, T. (1999). Peace, power, righteousness: An indigenous manifesto. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Apple, M. (1990). Is there a curriculum voice to reclaim? Phi Delta Kappan, 71, 526–530.Google Scholar
  3. Bach, R. (1977). Illusions: The adventure of a reluctant messiah. New York: Dell Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Bakhtin, M. (1930 [1981]). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  5. Battiste, M. (1998). Enabling the autumn seed: Toward a decolonized approach to aboriginal knowledge, language, and education. Canadian Journal of Native Education, 22(1), 16–24.Google Scholar
  6. Battiste, M. (Ed.). (2000). Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision. Vancouver, BC: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  7. Brody, H. (2000). The other side of Eden. New York: North Point Press.Google Scholar
  8. Castellano, M. B. (2000). Updating aboriginal traditions of knowledge. In G. Dei, B. Hall, & D. Rosenberg (Eds.), Indigenous knowledges in global contexts (pp. 21–36). Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  9. Chambers, C. (2003). “As Canadian as possible under the circumstances”: A view of contemporary curriculum discourses in Canada. In W. Pinar (Ed.), The internationalization handbook of curriculum research (pp. 221–252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associated.Google Scholar
  10. Chinn, C. A. (1998). A critique of social constructivist explanations of knowledge change. In B. Guzzetti & C. Hynd (Eds.), Perspectives on conceptual change: Multiple ways to understanding knowing and learning in a complex world (pp. 77–115). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  11. Codo, W. (1999). Educação: Carinho e trabalho [Education: Affection and work]. Petrópolis, RJ: Vozes.Google Scholar
  12. Cole, P., & O’Riley, P. (2005). Coyote and raven talk about the business of education or how did Wall Street, Bay Street and Sesame Street get into the pockets of publicly funded universities or vice versa. Workplace: A Journal for Academic Labor, 7(1), 15–28.Google Scholar
  13. Coles, R. (1989). The call of stories: Teaching and the moral imagination. Boston: Houghton Miffli.Google Scholar
  14. Dalke, A., & Grobstein, P. (2007). Story telling in (at least) three dimensions: An exploration of teaching reading, writing, and beyond. Journal of Teaching Writing, 23(1), 91–114.Google Scholar
  15. Deloria, V., Jr. (1997). Read earth white lies. Golden, Colorado: Fulcrum Publishing.Google Scholar
  16. Derrida, J. (1990 [2002]). Who is afraid of philosophy? Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Derrida, J. (1991 [1992]). The other heading: reflections on today’s Europe. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dixon, B. (1973). What is science for?. London: Collins.Google Scholar
  19. Donald, D. (2004). Edmonton pentimento: Re-reading history in the case of the papaschase cree. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 2(1), 21–53.Google Scholar
  20. Donald, D. (2009a). The curricular problem of indigenousness: Colonial frontier logics, teacher resistances, and the acknowledgement of ethical space. In J. Nhachewsky & I. Johnston (Eds.), Beyond “presentism”: Re-imagining the historical, personal, and social places of curriculum (pp. 23–39). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  21. Donald, D. (2009b). Forts, curriculum, and indigenous métissage: Imagining decolonization of aboriginal-Canadian relations in educational contexts. First Nations Perspectives. The Journal of the Manitoba First Nations Education Resource Centre, 2(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  22. Freire, P. (1970 [2006]). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  23. Grobstein, P. (2003). A vision of science (and science education) in the 21st century: Everybody “getting it less wrong” together. Paper presented at the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy’s 1st Dialogue on The Changing Roles of Mathematics and Science in Society. Chicago: Adler Planetarium. Retrieved September 13, 2010, from http://serendip.brynmawr.edu/sci_cult/imsa/imsatalk.html.
  24. Gudmundsdottir, S. (1995). The narrative nature of pedagogical content knowledge. In H. McEwan & K. Egan (Eds.), Narrative in teaching, learning, and research (pp. 24–38). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  25. Haig-Brown, C. (2008). Taking indigenous thought seriously: A rant on globalization with some cautionary notes. Journal of the Canadian Association of Curriculum Studies, 6(2), 8–24.Google Scholar
  26. Haig-Brown, C. (2009). Decolonizing Diaspora: Whose traditional land are we on? Cultural and Pedagogical Inquiry, 1(1), 4–21.Google Scholar
  27. Haig-Brown, C., & Dannenmann, K. (2002). A pedagogy of the land: Dreams of respectful relations. McGill Journal of Education, 3, 452–468.Google Scholar
  28. Hingangaroa Smith, G. (2000). Protecting and respecting indigenous knowledge. In M. Battiste (Ed.), Reclaiming indigenous voice and vision (pp. 209–224). Vancouver, B.C.: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jickling, B. (2001). Environmental thought, the language of sustainability, and digital watches. Environmental Education Research, 7, 167–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kay, P., & Kempton, W. (1984). What is the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis? American Anthropologist, 86, 65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. M.D.Z. (1936). A literalist of the imagination. Poetry, 47, 330–331.Google Scholar
  32. Mueller, M. & Tippins, D. (2009). van Eijck and Roth’s utilitarian science education: Why the recalibration of science and traditional ecological knowledge invokes multiple perspectives to protect science education from being exclusive. Cultural Studies in Science Education (Published on line 18 September).Google Scholar
  33. Ng-A-Fook, N. (2007). An indigenous curriculum of place: The United Houma nation’s contentious relationship with Louisiana’s educational institutions. New York, New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  34. Ng-A-Fook, N. (in press-a). Another bell ringing in the empty sky: Greenwashing, curriculum, and ecojustice. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies.Google Scholar
  35. Ng-A-Fook, N. (in press-b). Decolonizing narrative strands of our eco-civic responsibilities: Curriculum, social action, and indigenous communities. In K. Young & D. Stanley (Eds.), Contemporary studies in Canadian curriculum: Principles, portraits, and practices. Calgary, Alberta: Detselig Enterprises Ltd.Google Scholar
  36. Ontario Ministry of Education. (2008). Grade 9 and 10 science curriculum. Toronto, Ontario: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.Google Scholar
  37. Reis, G. (2009). Gross’s anatomy: Textual politics in science/biology education research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 781–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reis, G. (2010). Making science relevant: Conceptual change and the politics of science education. In W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Re/structuring science education: Re/uniting sociological and psychological perspectives (pp. 233–241). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Roth, W.-M. (2005). Doing qualitative research: Praxis of methods. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  40. Roth, W.-M., van Eijck, M., Reis, G., & Hsu, P. -L. (2008). Authentic science revisited. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schank, R., & Berman, T. (2006). Living stories: Designing story-based educational experiences. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 220–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, L. T. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  44. Stanley, T. (2009). The banality of colonialism: Encountering artifacts of genocide and white supremacy in Vancouver today. In S. Steinberg (Ed.), Diversity and multiculturalism (pp. 143–159). New York, New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  45. van Eijick, M., & Roth, W. M. (2007). Keeping the local local: Recalibrating the status of science and traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) in science education. Science Education, 9, 926–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. wa Thiong’o., N. (1986). Decolonizing the mind: The politics of language in African literature. London: James Currey Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. Wells, G. (2002). Learning and teaching for understanding: The key role of collaborative knowledge. Social Constructivist Teaching, 9, 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations