Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 265–286 | Cite as

The secret identity of a biology textbook: straight and naturally sexed

  • Jesse Bazzul
  • Heather Sykes
Article

Abstract

While education communities have well defined commitments to protect their learners from oppressive instructional materials, discourses of science education are often left unexamined. This analysis/critique employs queer theory as a perspective to look at how one widely used textbook in Ontario schools conceptualizes notions of gender and sexuality. Results indicate the use of discourses that promote exclusively heteronormative constructions of sexuality along with sex/gender binaries. Challenging such oppressive misconceptions of sex/gender and sexuality is discussed.

Keywords

Heteronormative(ity) Queer Textbook Gender Sexuality 

References

  1. Apple, M. (1990). The text and cultural politics. Journal of Educational Thought, 24, 17–33.Google Scholar
  2. Bagemihl, B. (1999). Biological exuberance: Animal homosexuality and natural diversity. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  3. Birke, L. (1994). Feminism, animals and science: The naming of the shrew. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Birke, L. (2000). Feminism and the biological body. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Britzman, D. (1998). Lost subjects, contested objects: Toward a psychoanalytic inquiry of learning. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  6. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of sex. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Carter, L. (2007). Sociocultural influences on science education: Innovation for contemporary times. Science Education, 92, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cavanagh, S., & Sykes, H. (2006). Transexual bodies at the olympics: The international olympic committee’s policy on transsexual athletes at the 2004 Athens summer games. Body Society, 12, 75–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connell, B. (2009). Gender. Syndey: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  10. Connelly, M., He, F., & Phillion, J. (2008). The sage handbook of curriculum and instruction. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Cowper’s Gland. (2008). In Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved November 4, 2009 from http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/84039/bulbourethral-gland.
  12. Duggan, L. (1995). The discipline problem: Queer theory meets lesbian and gay history. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 2, 179–191.Google Scholar
  13. Fausto-Sterling, A. (1992). Myths of gender: Biological theories about women and men ((2 Rev Sub ed.). New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  14. Fausto-Sterling, A. (2000). Sexing the body. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Felski, R. (1998). Introduction. In L. Bland & L. Doan (Eds.), Sexology in culture: Labelling bodies and desires (pp. 116–131). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Fifield, S. (2001, January). Identity, knowledge, and heteronormativity in science teacher education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Costa Mesa, CA.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (1998). History of sexuality (Vol. 1). New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  18. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  19. Haraway, D. (1997). Modest-witness@second-millenium. FemaleMan-meets-oncomouse: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Harding, S. (1993). The science question in feminism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Harding, S. (1998). Is science multicultural? Postcolonialism, feminism & epistemologies: Postcolonialisms, feminisms, and epistemologies. Bloomington, ID: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Hird, M. (2004). Sex, gender and science. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Irigaray, L. (1993). An ethics of sexual difference. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  25. Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., & Martin, C. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  27. Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kumashiro, K. (2000). Toward a theory of anti-oprresive education. Review of Educational Research, 70, 25–53.Google Scholar
  29. Letts, W. J. (1999). How to make “boys” and “girls” in the classroom: The heteronormative nature of elementary-school science. In W. J. Letts & J. Sears (Eds.), Queering elementary education: Advancing the dialogue about sexualities and schooling (pp. 97–110). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  30. Lovelock, J. (2001). Homage to Gaia: The life of an independent scientist (New ed.). New York, USA: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mccaskell, T. (2005). Race to equity: Disrupting educational inequality. Toronto: Between The Lines.Google Scholar
  32. McGraw Hill Ryerson. (2002). Biology 12. Toronto: McGraw Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
  33. Merton, K. (1947). Science, technology & society in seventeenth-century England. New York: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar
  34. Minton, H. (1997). Queer theory: Historical roots and implications for psychology. Theory & Psychology, 7, 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moallem, J. (2010). Can animals be gay? New York Times. Retrieved April 18 from http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/04/magazine/04animalst.html?pagewanted=1&ref=magazine.
  36. Namaste, V. (2000). Invisible lives: The erasure of transsexual and transgendered people. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nehm, H., & Young, R. (2008). “Sex Hormones” in secondary school biology textbooks. Science & Education, 17, 1175–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson, C. (1999). Sexual identities in ESL: Queer theory and classroom inquiry. Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages Quarterly, 33, 371–391.Google Scholar
  39. Nieto, M. (2008). Anatomy is destiny, except sometimes. The Gay and Lesbian Review World Wide, 15(6), 21–23.Google Scholar
  40. Oudshoorn, N. (1994). Beyond the natural body: An archaeology of sex hormones. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Penn, D. (1995). Queer: Theorizing politics and history. Radical History Review, 62, 24–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prosser, J. (1998). Transsexuals and transsexologists. In L. Bland & L. Doan (Eds.), Sexology in culture: Labelling bodies and desires (pp. 116–131). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Salvio, P. (2009). Uncanny exposures: A study of the wartime photojournalism of Lee Miller. Curriculum Inquiry, 39, 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sartre, J.-P. (1964). Saint Genet, actor and martyr. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  45. Schiebinger, L. (1991). The mind has no sex? Women in the origins of modern science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Sears, J. (1999). Teaching queerly: Some elementary propositions. In W. J. Letts & J. Sears (Eds.), Queering elementary education: Advancing the dialogue about sexualities and schooling (pp. 3–14). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  47. Sears, A. (2003). Retooling the mind factory: Education in lean state. Aurora, ON: Garamond Press.Google Scholar
  48. Seitler, D. (2004). Queer physiognomies: Or, how many ways can we do the history of sexuality? Criticism, 46, 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sleeter, C., & Grant, C. (1999). Making choices for multicultural education: Five approaches to race, class, and gender (3rd ed.). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  50. Snyder, L., & Broadway, S. (2004). Queering high school biology textbooks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 617–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Somerville, S. (1994). Queering the color line: Race and the invention of homosexuality in American culture (Series Q). London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Spanier, B. (1995). Im/partial science: Gender ideology in molecular biology (race, gender, and science). Bloomington, ID: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Sumara, D., & Davis, B. (1999). Interrupting heteronormativity: Toward a queer curriculum theory. Curriculum Inquiry, 29, 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Temple, J. (2005). “People who are different from you”: Heterosexism in Quebec high school textbooks. Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 271–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Toronto District School Board. (2000). Equity foundation statement and commitments to equity policy implementation. Retrieved November 5, 2009 from http://www.tdsb.on.ca/_site/ViewItem.asp?siteid=15&menuid=7098&pageid=6194.
  56. Wade, N. (2008). Taking a cue from ants on evolution of humans. New York Times. Retrieved November 1, 2009 from http://www.nytimes.com/2008/07/15/science/15wils.html.
  57. Weeks, J. (1993). Introduction to guy Hocquengham’s: Homosexual desire (pp. 49–55). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Weinstein, M., & Broda, M. (2009). Resuscitating the critical in the biological grotesque: Blood, guts, biomachismo in science/education and human guinea pig discourse. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 761–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wilson, E. O. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  60. Wong, D. (2001). Perspectives on learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 279–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Curriculum, Teaching and LearningOntario Institute for Studies in Education at the University of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations