Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 243–249 | Cite as

The conflict on genesis: building an integral bridge between creation and evolution

  • Elisabeth Settelmaier
Forum

Abstract

In this paper I respond to Long’s paper in which he uses an ethnographic snapshot of a rally of scientists against the perceived ‘dumbing down’ effect of the new Answers in Genesis Museum in Kentucky to raise educational concerns about the effects of creationist influence on the science curriculum in American schools. In my response I contextualise the conflict between creationists and evolutionists in the history of the Christian Churches and in my own personal history. Furthermore I illustrate how historically there been multiple versions and interpretations of the creation story in the past resulting in much conflict and angst. Finally I suggest an integral perspective that allows us to envisage a curriculum that presents multiple perspectives to students as a possible alternative to epistemological narrow-mindedness.

Keywords

Creationist/evolutionist conflict Historical and cultural contextualisation Gnostics Integral theory 

References

  1. Alexakos, K. (2009). Science and creationism: A response to Kenneth Tobin. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4, 495–504. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9175-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. London, GB: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Eisner, E. W. (2002). The educational imagination: On the design and evaluation of school programs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  4. Foucault, M. (2002) Archaeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan Smith, Trans.). London, GB: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Kennard, D. W. (Ed.). (1999). The relationship between epistemology, hermeneutics, biblical theology and contextualization: Understanding truth. Lewiston, NY: E. Mellen Press.Google Scholar
  6. Long, D. (2010). Scientists at play in a field of the Lord. Cultural Studies of Science Education. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9249-7.Google Scholar
  7. Martin, S. (2005). The Cathars. Harpenden, GB: Pocket Essentials.Google Scholar
  8. McIntosh, S. (2007). Integral consciousness and the future of evolution: How the integral worldview is transforming politics, culture and spirituality. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.Google Scholar
  9. Oldenbourg, Z. (2000). Massacre at Montsegur: The history of the Albigenisian Crusade. London: Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
  10. Paul P. J. II (1996). Message to the pontifical academy of sciences: On evolution. Retrieved December 17, 2009, from http://www.ewtn.com/library/PAPALDOC/JP961022.HTM.
  11. Roth, W. -M. (2010). Science and religion: What is at stake? Cultural Studies of Science Education, published on-line 16 September 2009, 1–13. doi: 10.1007/s11422-009-9234-1.
  12. Smith, A. P. (2008). The Gnostics: History, tradition, scriptures, influence. London: Watkins.Google Scholar
  13. Smoley, R. (2006). Forbidden faith: The Gnostic legacy. New York, NY: HarperSanFrancisco.Google Scholar
  14. Taylor, P. C., Settelmaier, E., & Luitel, B. C. (2010). Multi-paradigmatic transformative research as/for teacher education: An integral perspective. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), International handbook of science education. Dordrecht, NL: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Wilber, K. (2006). Integral spirituality: A startling new role for religion in the modern and postmodern world. Boston, MA: Integral Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of EducationCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations