Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 959–975 | Cite as

From object to subject: hybrid identities of indigenous women in science

  • Elizabeth McKinley
Article

Abstract

The use of hybridity today suggests a less coherent, unified and directed process than that found in the Enlightenment science’s cultural imperialism, but regardless of this neither concept exists outside power and inequality. Hence, hybridity raises the question of the terms of the mixture and the conditions of mixing. Cultural hybridity produced by colonisation, under the watchful eye of science at the time, and the subsequent life in a modern world since does not obscure the power that was embedded in the moment of colonisation. Indigenous identities are constructed within and by cultural power. While we all live in a global society whose consequences no one can escape, we remain unequal participants and globalisation remains an uneven process. This article argues that power has become a constitutive element in our own hybrid identities in indigenous people’s attempts to participate in science and science education. Using the indigenous peoples of Aotearoa New Zealand (called Māori) as a site of identity construction, I argue that the move from being the object of science to the subject of science, through science education in schools, brings with it traces of an earlier meaning of ‘hybridity’ that constantly erupts into the lives of Māori women scientists.

Keywords

Indigenous women Hybrid identity Colonialism Subjectivity 

References

  1. Beever, J., & Gresson, J. (1995). Polytrichum commune Hedw. and Polytrichadelphus magellanicus (Hedw.) Mitt. used as decorative material on New Zealand Māori cloaks. Journal of Bryology, 18, 819–823.Google Scholar
  2. Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, W. (1845). New Zealand and its Aborigines. London: Smith, Elder & Co.Google Scholar
  4. Buller, Rev. J. (1878). Forty years in New Zealand. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  5. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cooper, G. S. (1868–1869). Report from Mr G. S. Cooper, Esq., Resident Magistrate, Napier (1 April, 1868) Great Britain Parliamentary Papers. Colonies: New Zealand (GBPP), 1837–38, IUP Vol. 15, p. 177.Google Scholar
  7. Davies, C. B. (1994). Black women, writing and identity. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  9. Fanon, F. (1967). Black skin, White masks. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  10. Fordham, S. (1988). Racelessness as a factor in Black students’ school success: Pragmatic strategy or pyrrhic victory? Harvard Educational Review, 58, 54–84.Google Scholar
  11. Foucault, M. (1970). The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences. London: Tavistock.Google Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. Trans. by C. Gordon. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1981). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1. An introduction. Harmondsworth: Pelican.Google Scholar
  14. Grosz, E. (1994). Volatile bodies. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  16. McClintock, A. (1995). Imperial leather. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. McKinley, E. (2005). Brown bodies, white coats: Postcolonialism, Maori women and science. Discourse, 26, 481–496. doi: 10.1080/01596300500319761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Morrison, T. (1994). The bluest eye. London: Picador/Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
  19. Sequoya, J. (2005). How (!) is an Indian? In D. Gaurav & N. Supriya (Eds.), Postcolonialisms: An anthology of cultural theory and criticism (pp. 290–310). Oxford, UK: Oxford International Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  20. Sommer, D. (1988). “Not just a personal story”: Women’s testimonios and the plural self. In B. Brodzki & C. Schenck (Eds.), Life/lines: Theorizing women’s autobiography (pp. 107–130). Ithaca & London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Spivak, G. C. (1984). The rani of sirmur. In F. Barker, P. Hulme, M. Iversen & D. Loxley (Eds.), Europe and its others. Proceedings of the Essex Conference on the Sociology of Literature. Colchester: University of Essex, July 1984.Google Scholar
  22. Stoler, A. L. (1995). Race and the education of desire. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Trinh, T. M. (1989). Woman, native, other. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Yamamoto, T. (1999). Masking selves, making subjects. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  25. Young, R. (1995). Colonial desire. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations