Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 3, Issue 4, pp 917–935 | Cite as

Thriving in-between the cracks: Deleuze and guerilla science teaching in Singapore

  • Yew-Jin Lee
Article
First Online:

Abstract

The radical philosophies of difference articulated by Deleuze and Guattari are just beginning to impinge the field of education although less so within science education. One common thread among the numerous concepts and neologisms (especially the rhizome) that have been coined is the necessity for thinking and acting in what they call ‘experimental’ modes, which shifts our focus onto the eternal process of becoming rather than merely (re)producing states of being. I reflect upon these seemingly utopian ideas in the light of recent educational changes in Singapore aimed at preparing competent citizen–workers for the knowledge economy and globalization. In particular, this paper shows how one elementary science teacher adopted guerilla tactics while negotiating these sometimes conflicting transitions in policies. I argue that neither mandated, top-down reforms nor drastic experimentation by individuals alone are most productive but rather working in the ephemeral in-between spaces of the rhizome, which Deleuze and Guattari had all long championed.

Keywords

Deleuze and Guattari Singapore Curriculum Rhizome 

摘要

德勒兹与加达里的有关差异的激进哲学思想已在教育领域产生影响, 而其对科学教学的影响则稍显逊色。德勒兹与加达里提出了众多的概念, 也创造出许多新词语(尤其是 ‘根茎’, 利卓姆), 而贯穿其中的一个观点是, 我们要在所谓的‘试验’状态中思维与行动, 要关注永恒的生成过程, 而不是仅仅维持(复制)存在。本文探讨这些近似乌托邦式的观点对新加坡最近推行的旨在培养知识经济及全球化环境下的高素质公民-劳动者的教育改革的启发意义。将着重研究一位小学科学教师在解读有时自相矛盾的转型中的教育政策过程中所采取的游击式教学策略。作者认为, 指令性的, 自上而下的教育改革以及单枪匹马式的大幅度的教学实验皆不可取, 而德勒兹与加达里长期以来所倡导的于稍纵即逝的, 根茎的夹缝中求生才最有成效

关键字

德勒兹与加达里 新加坡 課 程 根茎 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Aik-Ling Tan for giving great feedback and much encouragement on earlier versions of this paper and Libo Guo for translating the abstract into Chinese.

References

  1. Bogue, R. (2004a). Apology for nomadology. Interventions, 6(2), 169–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogue, R. (2004b). Search, swim and see: Deleuze’s apprenticeship in signs and pedagogy of images. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 327–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, P., & Lauder, H. (2001). The future of skill formation in Singapore. Asia Pacific Business Review, 7, 113–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Callinicos, A. (1989). Against postmodernism: A Marxist critique. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. London: Blackwells.Google Scholar
  6. Chambers, C. (2003). “As Canadian as possible under the circumstances”: A view of contemporary curriculum discourses in Canada. In W. F. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 221–252). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1988). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: The Athlone Press.Google Scholar
  8. Deleuze, G., & Parnet, C. (2002). (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam Trans.) Dialogues II. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  9. Drummond, J. S. (2005). The rhizome and the tree: A response to Holmes and Gastaldo. Nursing Philosophy, 6, 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Edwards, R. (2006). A sticky business? Exploring the “and” in teaching and learning. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 27, 121–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Edwards, R., & Clarke, J. (2002). Flexible learning, spatiality and identity. Studies in Continuing Education, 24, 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Engeström, Y. (2006). From well-bounded ethnographies to intervening in mycorrhizae activities. Organization Studies, 27, 1783–1793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flannery, M. C. (2001). Quilting: A feminist metaphor for scientific inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 7, 628–645.Google Scholar
  14. Gough, N. (2006). Shaking the tree, making a rhizome: Towards a nomadic geophilosophy of science education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38, 625–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hagood, M. C. (2004). A rhizomatic cartography of adolescents, popular culture, and constructions of self. In K. M. Leander & M. Sheehy (Eds.), Spatializing literacy research and practice (pp. 143–160). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  16. Hogan, D. (2006). The pedagogy of science education in Singapore. Presentation given at Leading inquiry: A science education forum on 19th July 2006 in Singapore.Google Scholar
  17. Kamberelis, G. (2004). The rhizome and the pack: Liminal literacy formations with political teeth. In K. M. Leander & M. Sheehy (Eds.), Spatializing literacy research and practice (pp. 161–197). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  18. Koh, A. (2004). Singapore education in “New Times”: Global/local imperatives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25, 335–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Krejsler, J. (2004). Becoming individual in education and cyberspace. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10, 489–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Leach, M., & Boler, M. (1998). Giles Deleuze: Practicing education through flight and gossip. In M. Peters (Ed.), Naming the multiple: Poststructuralism and education (pp. 149–172). Wesport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
  21. Leander, K. M., & Rowe, D. W. (2006). Mapping literacy spaces in motion: A rhizomatic analysis of a classroom literacy performance. Reading Research Quarterly, 41, 428–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, I.C.H., & Luo, G. (2006). Is the paper and pencil assessment mode appropriate for assessing the learning outcomes of primary science? Teachers’ attitudes. In X. Liu & W. Boone (Eds.), Applications of Rasch Measurement in Science Education (pp. 285–314). Maple Grove, MN: JAM Press.Google Scholar
  23. Liew, W. M. (2005). Teachers’ professional lives in an age of educational reform. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Shaping Singapore’s future: Thinking schools, Learning Nation (pp. 137–166). Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  24. Martin, E. (1998). Anthropology and the cultural study of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 23, 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. McLaren, P. (2007). Life in schools: An introduction to critical pedagogy in the foundations of education. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  26. Measuring globalization (2005). Foreign Policy, 148(May–June), 52–60.Google Scholar
  27. Michael, M. (2002). Comprehension, apprehension, prehension: Heterogeneity and the public understanding of science. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 27, 347–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ministry of Trade and Industry (2006). Sustaining innovation-driven growth: Science & technology plan 2010. Singapore: SNP Printing.Google Scholar
  29. Nietzsche, F. W. (1967). The birth of tragedy, and the case of Wagner. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  30. Parr, A. (Ed.). (2005). The Deleuze dictionary. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pearson, M., & Somekh, B. (2006). Learning transformation with technology: A question of sociocultural contexts?. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19, 519–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peters, M. A. (2004). Geophilosophy, education and the pedagogy of the concept [Special issue]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3).Google Scholar
  33. Peters, M. A. (2006). Philosophy of science [Special issue]. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(5).Google Scholar
  34. Rogan, J. M. (2007). How much curriculum change is appropriate? Defining a zone of feasible innovation. Science Education, 91, 439–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  36. Semetsky, I. (2004). Experiencing Deleuze. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36, 227–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sharpe, L., & Gopinathan, S. (2002). After effectiveness: New direction in the Singapore school system?. Journal of Education Policy, 17, 151–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stivale, C. J. (1998). The two-fold thought of Deleuze and Guattari: Intersections and animations. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. St.Pierre, E. A. (1997). Circling the text: Nomadic writing practices. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 403–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tan, C. (2005). Driven by pragmatism: Issues and challenges in an ability-driven education. In J. Tan & P. T. Ng (Eds.), Shaping Singapore’s future: Thinking schools, Learning Nation (pp. 5–21). Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  41. Tan, J., & Ng, P. T. (2005). Shaping Singapore’s future: Thinking schools, Learning Nation. Singapore: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Tubbs, N. (2005). The philosophy of the teacher. The Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 39, 183–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Venthan, A. M. (2006). An insight into secondary science education in Singapore classrooms. Unpublished masters thesis, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.Google Scholar
  44. Woronov, T. E. (2004). In the eye of the chicken: Hierarchy and marginality among Beijing’s migrant schoolchildren. Ethnography, 5, 289–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Yeo, J., Tan, S. C., & Lee, Y.-J. (2006). A learning journey in problem-based learning. In S. A. Barab, K. E. Hay, & D. T. Hickey (Eds.), 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 27 June–1 July (pp. 859–865). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  46. Zembylas, M., & Vrasidas, C. (2005). Globalization, information and communication technologies, and the prospect of a ‘global village’: Promises of inclusion or electronic colonization? Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 65–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Sciences and Science Education Academic GroupNational Institute of EducationSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations

Cite article

Buy options