Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 3, Issue 2, pp 329–350 | Cite as

Learning to use scientific concepts

  • Gordon WellsEmail author
Forum

Abstract

In responding to the research on conceptual change, this article attempts to make two points. First, scientific concepts are not possessed by individuals; rather, they are part of a culture’s resources, which individuals learn to use for their own or for group purposes. Second, particular concepts are most effectively mastered when the learner is deeply engaged in solving a problem for which they function as effective semiotic tools in achieving a solution. On these grounds, it is argued that the mastering of scientific concepts is best achieved through learning to use them in motivated inquiry.

Keywords

Spontaneous and scientific concepts Cultural artifacts Inquiry Popper Vygotsky 

References

  1. Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (Y. McGee, Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, T., & Wells, G. (2006). Walking the talk: The complexities of teaching about teaching. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 18(3), 188–203.Google Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. In V. S. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 71–81). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  5. Beach, K. (1999). Consequential transitions. In A. Iran-Nejad & P. D. Pearso (Eds.), Review of research in education (Vol. 24, pp. 101–139). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
  6. Bereiter, C. (1994). Implications of postmodernism for science, or, science as progressive discourse. Educational Psychologist, 29(1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. (Eds.) (2000). How people learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, A. L., et al. (1996). Social interaction and individual understanding in a community of learners: The influence of Piaget. In V. A. Tryphon & J. Vonèche (Eds.), Piaget-Vygotsky: The social genesis of thought (pp. 145–170). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Bruner, J. S. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Clark, E. (1974). Some aspects of the conceptual basis for first language acquisition. In R. Schiefelbusch & L. Lloyd (Eds.), Language perspectives: Acquisition, retardation and intervention. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
  12. Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  13. Crowder, E. M. (1996). Gestures at work in sense-making science talk. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 5(3), 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of culture and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Galbraith, B., Van Tassell, M. A., & Wells, G. (1997). Learning and teaching in the zone of proximal development. In A. Alvarez (Ed.), Hacia un curriculum cultural: La vigencia de Vygotski en educacion. Madrid: Fundacion Infancia y Aprendizaje. Reprinted in Wells, 1999.Google Scholar
  17. Halliday, M. A. K. (1988). On the language of physical science. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.), Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features (pp. 162–178). London: Frances Pinter.Google Scholar
  18. Halliday, M. A. K. (1993). Towards a language-based theory of learning. Linguistics and Education, 5, 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1991). Sharing cognition through collective comprehension activity. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine, & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 331–348). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Herrenkohl, L. R., & Guerra, M. R. (1998). Participant structures, scientific discourse and student engagement in fourth grade. Cognition and Instruction, 16(4), 431–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hume, K. (2001). Seeing shades of grey: Developing a knowledge building community through science. In G. Wells (Ed.), Talk, text, and inquiry (pp. 99–117). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  23. Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning, and values. Ñorwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  26. Luria, A. R. (1976). Cognitive development: Its cultural and social foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Nelson, K. (2007). Young minds in social worlds: Experience, meaning and memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Olson, D. R. (1994). The world on paper. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Olson, D. R. (2003). Psychological theory and educational reform: How school remakes mind and society. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Popper, K. R. (1972). Objective knowledge: An evolutionary approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  31. Popper, K. R. (1978). Three worlds. In The Tanner lectures on human values (pp. 143–167). Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah.Google Scholar
  32. Popper, K. R., & Eccles, J. C. (1977). The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  33. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1983). Child as coinvestigator: Helping children gain insight into their own mental processes. In S. Paris, G. Olson, & H. Stevenson (Eds.), Learning and motivation in the classroom (pp. 61–82). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, J. P., diSessa, A. A., & Roschelle, J. (1993). Misconceptions reconceived: A constructivist analysis of knowledge in transition. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(2), 115–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. van Zee, E. H., Iwasyk, M., Kurose, A., Simpson, D., & Wild, J. (2001). Student and teacher questioning during conversations about science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 159–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language (L. Mtejka & I. R. Titunik, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Vygotsky, L. S. (1981). The genesis of higher mental functions. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet Psychology (pp. 144–188). Armonk, NY: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech (N. Minick, Trans.). In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol. 1: Problems of general psychology (pp. 39–285). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  40. Wartofsky, M. (1979). Models, representation and the scientific understanding. Boston: Reidel.Google Scholar
  41. Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  42. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wells, G. (Eds.) (2001). Action, talk, and text: Learning and teaching through inquiry. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  44. Wertsch, J. V. (1991). Voices of the mind: A sociocultural approach to mediated action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EducationUniversity of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations