Advertisement

Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 225–242 | Cite as

Professional learning opportunities from uncovering cover stories of science and science teaching for a scientist-in-transition

  • Stephen M. RitchieEmail author
  • Gillian Kidman
  • Tanya Vaughan
Original Article

Abstract

Members of particular communities produce and reproduce cultural practices. This is an important consideration for those teacher educators who need to prepare appropriate learning experiences and programs for scientists, as they attempt to change careers to science teaching. We know little about the transition of career-changing scientists as they encounter different contexts and professional cultures, and how their changing identities might impact on their teaching practices. In this narrative inquiry of the stories told by and shared between career-changing scientists in a teacher-preparation program, we identify cover stories of science and teaching. More importantly, we show how uncovering these stories became opportunities for one of these scientists to learn about what sorts of stories of science she tells or should tell in science classrooms and how these stories might impact on her identities as a scientist–teacher in transition. We highlight self-identified contradictions and treat these as resources for further professional learning. Suggestions for improving the teacher-education experiences of scientist–teachers are made. In particular, teacher educators might consider the merits of creating opportunities for career-changing scientists to share their stories and for these stories to be retold for different audiences.

Keywords

Emotions Identity Narrative inquiry Scientific practice and culture Teacher learning  Teacher stories 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge Dr. Jan Millwater’s contribution to the production of the promotional DVD in which Tanya featured and some support for research-assistance funds from the QUT Teaching and Learning Large Grant called: “Transition to Professional Practice.” We also wish to thank Emeritus Professor Campbell McRobbie for his comments on a previous draft of this article.

References

  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Lederman, N. G. (2000). Improving science teachers’ conceptions of nature of science: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer, H. H. (1992). Scientific literacy and the myth of the scientific method. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bhabha, H. K. (1994). The location of culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Bonner, J. J. (2005). Which scientific method should we teach & when? Guest editorial. The American Biology Teacher, 67(5), 262–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Britzman, D. P. (1993). The terrible problem of knowing thyself: Toward a poststructuralist account of teacher identity. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 9, 23–46.Google Scholar
  6. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1994). Telling teaching stories. Teacher Education Quarterly, 21(1), 145–158.Google Scholar
  7. Crites, S. (1979). The aesthetics of self-deception. Soundings, 62, 107–129.Google Scholar
  8. Enyedy, N., Goldberg, J., & Welsh, K. M. (2006). Complex dilemmas of identity and practice. Science Education, 90, 68–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Flores, M. A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts which shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: A multi-perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gauld, C. (1982). The scientific attitude and science education: A critical reappraisal. Science Education, 66(1), 109–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning of science in Australian schools. A research report prepared for the Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.Google Scholar
  13. Hand, B., & Prain, V. (2006). Moving from border crossing to convergence of perspectives in language and science literacy research and practice. International Journal of Science Education, 28(2–3), 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harris, K.-L., Jensz, F., & Baldwin, G. (2005). Who’s teaching science? Meeting the demand for qualified science teachers in Australian secondary schools. Report prepared for the Australian Council of Deans of Science. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  15. Holland, D., Lachicotte, W. Jr., Skinner, D., & Cain, C. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Mackay, J. (2002). An interview with Dr. Joel Mackay, biochemist. Interviews with Australian scientists program. Canberra: Australian Academy of Science. Retrieved May 10, 2006 from: http://www.science.org.au/scientists/mackay.htm.
  17. Moine, L. J., Dorfield, J. K., & Schunn, C. D. (2005). Where can we find future k-12 science and math teachers? A search by academic year, discipline, and academic performance level. Science Education, 89, 980–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Olson, M. R. (1995). Conceptualizing narrative authority: Implications for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(2), 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Olson, M. R., & Craig, C. J. (2005). Uncovering cover stories: Tensions and entailments in the development of teacher knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 35(2), 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ritchie, S. M., Bellocchi, A., Poltl, H., & Wearmouth, M. (2006). Metaphors and analogies in transition: Beginning teachers’ lived experience. In P. J., Aubusson, A. G., Harrison, & S. M., Ritchie (Eds.), Metaphor and analogy in science education (pp. 143–154). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Roth, W.-M. (in press). Bricolage, métissage, hybridity, heterogeneity, diaspora: Concepts for thinking science education in the 21st century. Cultural Studies of Science Education.Google Scholar
  22. Skilbeck, M., & Connell, H. (2004). Teachers for the future—the changing nature of society and related issues for the teaching workforce. A report to the Teacher Quality and Educational Leadership Taskforce of the Australian Ministerial Council for Education, Employment Training and Youth Affairs. Melbourne, Victoria: MCEETYA.Google Scholar
  23. Tonso, K. (2006). Student engineers and engineering identity: Campus engineer identities as figured world. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1(2), 273–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tucker-Raymond, E., Varelas, M., & Pappas, C. C., with Korzh, A., & Wentland, A. (2006). “They probably aren’t named Rachel”: Young children’s scientist identities as emergent multimodal narratives. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 1.Google Scholar
  25. Varelas, M., House, R., & Wenzel, S. (2005). Beginning teachers immersed into science: Scientist and science teacher identities. Science Education, 89, 492–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zembylas, M. (2003). Emotions and teacher identity: A poststructural view. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 9(3), 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen M. Ritchie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Gillian Kidman
    • 1
  • Tanya Vaughan
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Mathematics, Science and Technology EducationQueensland University of TechnologyKelvin GroveAustralia
  2. 2.St Margaret’s Anglican Girls SchoolAscotAustralia

Personalised recommendations