Cultural Studies of Science Education

, Volume 1, Issue 4, pp 657–680 | Cite as

Cross-cultural perceptions of assessment of selected international science teachers in American high schools

Original Paper
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

International high school science teachers are crossing international and cultural borders to teach, raising important issues in education. In this article, we describe the cross-cultural assessment challenges that four international science teachers encountered when they migrated to teach in the United States. These included differences in grade expectations for a given quality of work, the weight given to final examinations, the assessment process, and cut-off scores for letter grades. To become proficient in their new teaching contexts, the participating teachers had to modify (or hybridize) their assessment philosophies and practices in order to conform to the expectations of their new schools. This hybridization process ushered them into what is proposed as the pedagogical imaginary; a transitional space between the “purity” of their native educational conventions and that of their American schools. The implications of these findings are discussed in hopes of improving high school science teaching experiences for international science teachers.

Keywords

International Assessment Cross-cultural Intercultural 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Al-Sadan, I. A. (2000). Educational assessment in Saudi Arabian schools. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 7(1), 143–155.Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Atwater, M., & Riley, J. P. (1993). Multicultural science education: Perspectives, definitions, and research agenda. Science Education, 77, 661–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bodley, J. H. (1997). Cultural anthropology: Tribes, states, and the global system. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Bodycott, P., & Walker, A. (2000). Teaching abroad: Lessons learned about inter-cultural understanding for teachers in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1), 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Brandsen, T., Ribeiro, T. D., van Hout, E., & Putters, K. (2005). Hybridity: A distinct reality (You cannot fly on one wing only). Paper submitted to the Third Sector Study Group Conference of the European Group of Public Administration, Bern (March, 2005).Google Scholar
  8. Bronowski, J. (1972). Science and human values. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  9. Crooks, T.J. (2002). Educational assessment in New Zealand schools. Assessment in Education, 9(2), 237–253.Google Scholar
  10. Darling-Hammond, L. (1999). Solving the dilemmas of teacher supply, demand and standards: how we can ensure a competent, caring, and qualified teacher for every child. NY: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.http://www.nctaf.org. Strategies to reduce teacher shortages.Google Scholar
  11. Doran R. L., Lawrenz F., & Hegelson, S. (1994). Research on assessment in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research of science teaching and learning (pp. 389–442). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  12. Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fortuijn, J. D. (2002). Internationalizing learning and teaching: A European experience. Journal of Geography, 26(3), 263–273.Google Scholar
  14. Grissmer, D., & Kirby, S. N. (1997). Teacher turnover and teacher quality. Teachers College Record, 99(1), 45–57.Google Scholar
  15. Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. (1984). Hidden differences: How to communicate with the Germans. In␣E. Kuhn (1996). Cross-cultural stumbling block for international teachers. College Teaching, 44(3), 96–100.Google Scholar
  16. Hambleton, R. K. (2000). Advances in performance assessment methodology. Applied Psychological Measurement, 24(4), 291–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hassard, J. (2000). Science as inquiry. New Jersey: Good Year.Google Scholar
  18. Hussar, W. J. (1999). Predicting the Need for Newly Hired Teachers in the United States to 2008–09 (NCES 1999-026).Google Scholar
  19. Hutchison, C. B. (2005). Teaching in America: A cross-cultural guide for international teachers and their employers. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Hutchison, C. B. (2006) Pedagogical issues arising for four science teachers during their international migration. School Science and Mathematics, 106(2), 74–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hutchison, C. F. (1930). The pen-pictures of modern Africans and African celebrities. Accra: The African Library Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhn, E. (1996). Cross-cultural stumbling block for international teachers. College Teaching, 44(3), 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kennedy, M. M. (2000). Learning to teach in a different culture. Teachers and Teaching, 6(1), 75–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ladson-Billings, G. (1994). The dream keepers: Successful teachers of African-American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  26. Lewin, K., & Dunne, M. (2000) Policy and practice in assessment in Anglophone Africa: Does globalisation explain convergence? Assessment in Education, 7(3), 379–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mager, G. M. (1992). The place of induction in becoming a teacher. In G. P. DeBolt (Ed.), Teacher Induction and Mentoring: School-based Collaborative Programs (pp. 3–32). New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  28. National Education Association November 2003 Report. Retrieved February 22, 2004, from http://www.nea.org/teachershortage/0306foreignteacher.html.Google Scholar
  29. No Child Left Behind Act (2002). Retrieved February 22, 2004, from http://www.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml.Google Scholar
  30. Podolefsky, A., & Brown, P. J. (1997). Applying cultural anthropology: An introductory reader. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  31. Rakow, S. J., & Bermudez, A. B. (1993). Science is “ciencia”: Meeting the needs of Hispanic American students. Science Education, 77(6), 669–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rajbhandari, P., & Wilmut, J. (2000). Assessment in Nepal. Assessment in Education, 7(2), 255–269.Google Scholar
  33. Roth, W.-M. (1993). Construction sites: Science labs and classrooms. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The Practice of Constructivism in Science Teaching (pp. 145–170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  34. Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1998). Assessment. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  35. Sarkodie-Mensah, K. (1991). The international student as TA. College Teaching, 39(3), 115–116.Google Scholar
  36. Schensul, J. J., LeCompte, M. D., Nastasi, B. K., & Borgati, S. P. (1999). Enhanced ethnographic methods. Walnut Creek, CA: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
  37. Schon, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  38. Sebatane, M. (2000). International transfers of assessment: Recent trends and strategies. Assessment in Education, 7(3), 401–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sewell, W. H. Jr. (1999). The concepts of culture. In V. E. Bonnell & L. Hunt (Eds.), Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture (pp. 35–61). University of California Press.Google Scholar
  40. Seidman, I. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: a guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  41. Tobin, K. (2005). Urban science as a culturally and socially adaptive practice. In K. Tobin, R.␣Elmesky, & G. Seiler (Eds.), Improving urban science: New roles for teachers, students, and researchers (pp. 21–42). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. (1996). Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science teaching. Science Education, 80(6), 711–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. U.S. Census Bureau (2004). U.S. interim projections by age, sex, race and Hispanic origin. Retrieved February 17, 2006, from http://www.census.gov/ipc/www/userinterimproj.Google Scholar
  44. Weiss, E. M., & Weiss, S. G. (2000). Beginning teacher induction. ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education: Washington, DC. (ERIC No. ED436487).Google Scholar
  45. Yook, E. L., & Albert, R. D. (1999). Perceptions of teaching assistants: The interrelatedness of intercultural training, cognition, and emotion. Communication Education, 48(1), 1–17 [Electronic version. Accession# 1487397].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Young, M. (2003). Curriculum studies and the problem of knowledge: Updating the enlightenment? Policy Futures in Education, 1(3), 553–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North CarolinaCharlotteUSA

Personalised recommendations