Removal of Non-economic Damage Caps Is Not Associated with Reductions in Early Imaging for Low Back Pain
- 6 Downloads
Supporters of medical liability reform contend that caps on non-economic damages will decrease defensive medicine.
We examined whether removal of caps on non-economic damages affect one type of defensive medical practice, early imaging for new-onset low back pain.
Patients and Methods
Using administrative claims data, we retrospectively studied adult patients evaluated for new-onset low back pain from 2007 to 2012. We included patients from two states that had caps on non-economic damages struck down in 2010 (n = 462,604) and patients from adjacent states (n = 781,963). Using a difference-in-differences approach, we evaluated the impact of non-economic damage caps on early imaging while adjusting for physician specialty, patient characteristics, and year- and state-level fixed effects.
There was no association between non-economic damage caps and early imaging for low back pain among all providers. Removal of a non-economic damage cap was also not associated with a significant change in early imaging within the two cap-removal states. Subgroup analysis by physician specialty demonstrated significantly increased use of early imaging for low back pain by orthopedic or neurological surgeons in the first 12 months following cap removal in one state (but this difference did not persist beyond 12 months). In the other cap-removal state, early imaging increased among orthopedic and neurological surgeons more than 12 months after cap removal.
We found no association between caps on non-economic damages and early imaging for low back pain among all physicians. However, our subgroup analysis suggests that physician specialties may respond to non-economic damage cap policies differently.
Keywordsdefensive medicine tort reform malpractice low back pain early imaging
This article is the authors’ responsibility and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NCATS, the AHRQ, the NCI, or the NIH.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
Michael F. Pesko, PhD, and Elizabeth Sepper, JD, declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Christopher J. Dy, MD, MPH, reports support from grant number UL1 TR000448, Sub award KL2 TR000450, from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS), and from the NIH Roadmap for Medical Research, during the conduct of the study. Margaret A. Olsen, PhD, MPH, reports grants and personal fees from Pfizer and grants from Sanofi Pasteur, outside the submitted work. Matthew Keller, MS, and Margaret A. Olsen, PhD, MPH, report partial support from the Center for Administrative Data Research at the Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences, grant number UL1 TR000448 from NCATS, grant number R24 HS19455 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), and grant number KM1CA156708 from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) at the NIH.
Required Author Forms
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.
- 1.Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research. National Quality Measures Clearinghouse. 2016. Available at https://www.qualitymeasures.ahrq.gov/.
- 3.Bigos S, Bowyer OR, Braen G, et al. Acute low back problems in adults. P. H. S. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Rockville, MD. 1994. AHCPR Publication No. 95–0642.Google Scholar
- 6.Choosing Wisely. Imaging for low back pain. 2012. Available at: http://www.choosingwisely.org/clinician-lists/american-academy-family-physicians-imaging-low-back-pain/.
- 7.Choosing Wisely. Lumbar spine imaging in the ED. 2014. Available at: http://www.choosingwisely.org/clinician-lists/acep-lumbar-spine-imaging-in-the-ed/.
- 12.Heggeness MH. AAOS endorses back pain guidelines. AAOS Now. Sept 2010. Available at: https://www.aaos.org/AAOSNow/2010/Sep/cover/cover1/?ssopc=1. Accessed 27 July 2017.
- 19.Malani A, Reif J. Accounting of anticipation effects: an application to medical malpractice tort reform. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper no. 578, 2011. University of Chicago Law School. Chicago Unbound. Available at http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics/28/. Accessed 27 July 2017.
- 20.Massachusetts Medical Society. Investigation of defensive medicine in Massachusetts. 2008: 1–19. Available at http://www.massmed.org/defensivemedicine/. Accessed 27 July 2017.
- 26.Ryan, P. A better way: our vision for a confident America. 2017. Available at http://abetterway.speaker.gov/. Accessed 27 July 2017.
- 31.US Congress. Empowering Patients First Act: HR 3400, 111th US Congress; HR 3000, 112th Congress; HR 2300, 113th Congress. 2017. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/2300. Accessed 27 July 2017.
- 32.US Congress. Protecting Access to Care Act of 2017. 2017. Available at https://www.congress.gov/bill/115th-congress/house-bill/1215. Accessed 27 July 2017.