Measuring the Value of Program Adaptation: A Comparative Effectiveness Study of the Standard and a Culturally Adapted Version of the Arthritis Self-Help Program
- 185 Downloads
Arthritis remains an important public health problem.
This study aims to determine the effects of an adapted (vs. the original) Arthritis Self-Help Program (ASHP) among older adults. Specifically, this study sought to determine (1) whether the adapted ASHP improved attendance, retention, and adherence with the use of self-management exercises, and (2) if the original ASHP’s beneficial outcomes were maintained following program adaptation.
Patient and Methods
Individuals age ≥60 with self-reported arthritis were recruited from eight New York City senior centers. Participants were assessed at baseline to assess their demographic and clinical status and at 6 and 24 weeks to ascertain study outcomes using validated measures.
Two-hundred-one participants (64 non-Hispanic African Americans, 86 Hispanics, and 51 non-Hispanic Whites) enrolled. Participants in the adapted (vs. original) ASHP had better average attendance in the six session program (4.7 vs. 3.2 classes attended, p < 0.01) and program retention (93% vs. 74%, p < 0.01). Adherence with use of the self-management exercises (number of days using endurance, stretching, and relaxation exercises) was similar in both groups. Significant positive physical/psychosocial outcomes were documented in both the adapted and original program.
The adapted ASHP improved program attendance and retention while maintaining improvements in physical and psychosocial functions. These results support future efforts to employ controlled designs to quantify the benefits of adapted evidence-based programs to ensure that adaptation maintains program effectiveness.
Keywordsarthritis self-management health promotion
This work was supported by the National Institute of Nursing Research [R21NR010200]; and the National Institute on Aging: An Edward R. Roybal Center Grant [P30AG022845].
Conflict of Interest:
M. Carrington Reid, MD received personal fees from Endo Pharmaceuticals during the study. Emily K. Chen, Samantha J. Parker, Charles R. Henderson Jr., Karl Pillemer, Ph.D., have declared that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008 (5).
Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.
Required Author Forms
Disclosure forms provided by the authors are available with the online version of this article.
- 8.Calsyn R, Tornatzky LG, Dittmar S. Incomplete adoption of an innovation: The case of goal attainment scaling. Evaluation. 1977; 4: 128-130.Google Scholar
- 20.Krivitsky L, Parker SJ, Pal A, Shengelia R, Reid MC. A systematic review of health promotion and disease prevention program adaptations: How are programs adapted? In: Wethington E, Dunifon R, eds. Translational research for improving outcomes across the life course. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press; 2012: 73-99.Google Scholar
- 24.Lorig K. Arthritis self-help course: Leader's manual and reference material. The Arthritis Foundation: Atlanta; 1992.Google Scholar
- 27.Lorig K, Gonzalez V, Stewart A, Ritter P, Laurent D, Lynch J. Outcome measures for health education and other health care interventions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1996.Google Scholar
- 34.Parker SJ, Chen EK, Pillemer K, et al. Participatory adaptation of an evidence-based, arthritis self-management program: Making changes to improve program fit. Fam Comm Health. 2012; 35(3): 236-245.Google Scholar
- 39.Stanford Arthritis Center. Curso de manejo personal de la artritis: Manual de los instructores [Arthritis Self-Management Course: Leader's Manual]. Palo Alto: Stanford Arthritis Center; 1995.Google Scholar
- 47.Zhang J. Illness management strategies among Chinese immigrants living with arthritis [Dissertation]. Calgary: University of Calgary; 1998.Google Scholar