Anterior Elongation as a Minimally Invasive Alternative for Sagittal Imbalance—A Case Series
- First Online:
Degenerative and iatrogenic conditions may lead to flat back or even to kyphotic deformity, and sagittal imbalance can cause significant clinical impairment. Minor imbalance cases are usually treated with conservative care. Among currently popular surgical techniques for the correction of sagittal imbalance are posterior-based procedures, which are associated with access-related risks (mostly neurological) and postoperative morbidity risks.
This study aims to report a minimally invasive lateral approach using hyperlordotic cages in the treatment of mild sagittal imbalance. Radiological correction, clinical improvement, and safety will be analyzed.
Eight patients (mean age 71.8 years, SD 7.8; mean BMI 27.5, SD 2.3) with symptomatic sagittal imbalance were retrospectively reviewed. Eight cases were treated by anterior interbody fusion with lordotic cages. A minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal approach was used in the surgical procedures, with or without percutaneous pedicle screw supplementation.
No major complications occurred and just one case needed revision for direct decompression. Clinical outcomes Visual Analog Scale score changed from 88 at preoperative visit to 51 at 1-week visit, and Oswestry Disability Index score decreased from 82 at preoperative visit to 44 at 6-week visit. The 6-month radiological assessment revealed improvement in spinopelvic parameters: Focal lordosis improved from 2.3° ± 7.7 to 27.1° ± 6.7. Sagittal vertical alignment improved from 11.7 ± 5.3 to 6.2 ± 4.0 cm. Preoperative sacral slope improved from 20.1° ± 5.8 to 29.4° ± 10.3 and preoperative pelvic tilt improved from 35.2° ± 5.2 to 23.8° ± 4.3. Short-term results indicate that the minimally invasive lateral approach can be applied to the treatment of mild sagittal imbalance, with special advantage in elderly patients or those in which posterior approaches are relatively contraindicated.
Keywordsspine lumbar spine spine fusion sagittal balance minimally invasive surgery interbody fusion
- 10.Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS. Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurgical FOCUS. 2010 mar;28(3):E8.Google Scholar
- 13.Isaacs RE, Hyde J, Goodrich JA, Rodgers WB, Phillips FM. A prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter evaluation of extreme lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of adult degenerative scoliosis: perioperative outcomes and complications. Spine. 2010 dez 15;35(26 Suppl):S322-330.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Knight R, Jackson R, Killian J, Stanley E. White paper on sagittal alignment [Internet]. Available from: http://www.srs.org/professionals/resources/sagittal_plane_white_paper.pdf.
- 24.Oliveira L, Marchi L, Coutinho E, Abdala N, Pimenta L. The use of rh-BMP2 in Standalone eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF®): Clinical and Radiological Results After 24 Months Follow-up. WSCJ. 2010;1(1):19–25.Google Scholar
- 28.Rodgers WB, Cox C, Gerber E. Experience and Early Results with a Minimally Invasive Technique for Anterior Column Support Through eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF®). US Musculoskelet Rev. 2007;2:28–32.Google Scholar
- 29.Rodgers WB, Cox CS, Gerber EJ. Early Complications of Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion in the Obese. J Spinal Disord Tech [Internet]. 2010 jan 15 [citado 2010 ago 2];Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20084027.
- 32.Sharma AK, Kepler CK, Girardi FP, Cammisa FP, Huang RC, Sama AA. Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes at 1 Year: A Preliminary Report. J Spinal Disord Tech [Internet]. 2010 set 14 [citado 2010 nov 17];Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20844451.