HSS Journal

, Volume 6, Issue 1, pp 52–56 | Cite as

Symptomatic Glenoid Loosening Complicating Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

  • Bradley S. Raphael
  • Joshua S. Dines
  • Russell F. Warren
  • Mark Figgie
  • Edward V. Craig
  • Stephen Fealy
  • David M. Dines


Glenoid component loosening is one of the most common causes of failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Previous reports indicate that it is desirable to reimplant the glenoid component during revision shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of our study was to retrospectively evaluate the satisfaction of patients undergoing glenoid revision (reimplantation or resection) following total shoulder replacement specifically for symptomatic glenoid loosening. Twenty-eight shoulders that developed symptomatic glenoid loosening following primary total shoulder arthroplasty were included in the study. Patients were retrospectively evaluated at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. Patients either underwent resection followed by reimplantation of the glenoid component (13) or resection of the component with or without bone grafting (15). Each patient was evaluated with the UCLA Shoulder Scale and the Constant–Murley Shoulder Assessment. There were seven excellent, 13 good, five fair and three poor results on the UCLA score. Functional outcome scores trended higher in the reimplantation group but were not statistically significant. Both groups reported equal pain relief and satisfaction. Five out of 15 patients underwent arthroscopic resection of the glenoid, and these patients scored as well on the UCLA and Constant scores as the reimplantation group. When symptomatic glenoid loosening is the indication for revision total shoulder replacement, patients tend to achieve good to excellent results. Though functional scores were slightly higher in the reimplantation group, satisfaction was equally high in both groups. Resection, when indicated, should be performed arthroscopically as this improved functional outcome in our series.


revision shoulder arthroplasty glenoid loosening reimplantation 


  1. 1.
    Amstutz HC, Sew Hoy AL, Clarke IC. UCLA anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1981; (155): 7–20Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Antuna SA, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, Rowland CM. Glenoid revision surgery after total shoulder arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2001; 10(3): 217–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bell SN, Gschwend N. Clinical experience with total arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder using the Neer prosthesis. Int. Orthop. 1986; 10(4): 217–222CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boyd AD Jr, Thomas WH, Scott RD, Sledge CB, Thornhill TS. Total shoulder arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty. Indications for glenoid resurfacing. J Arthroplast 1990; 5(4): 329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheung EV, Sperling JW, Cofield RH. Revision shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid component loosening. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2008; 17(3): 371–375CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cofield RH. Total shoulder arthroplasty with the Neer prosthesis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1984; 66(6): 899–906Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1987; (214): 160–164Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Deutsch A, Abboud JA, Kelly J, Mody M, Norris T, Ramsey ML. Iannotti JP, Williams GR. Clinical results of revision shoulder arthroplasty for glenoid component loosening. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2007; 16(6): 706–16CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dines JS, Fealy S, Strauss EJ, Allen A, Craig EV, Warren RF, Dines DM. Outcomes analysis of revision total shoulder replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2006; 88(7): 1494–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Field LD, Dines DM, Zabinski SJ, Warren RF. Hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder for rotator cuff arthropathy. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1997; 6(1): 18–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hawkins RJ, Greis PE, Bonutti PM. Treatment of symptomatic glenoid loosening following unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty. Orthopedics 1999; 22(2): 229–234PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hersch JC, Dines DM. Arthroscopy for failed shoulder arthroplasty. Arthroscopy 2000; 16(6): 606–612PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kay SP, Amstutz HC. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty at UCLA. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 1988; (228): 42–48.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Neer CS 2nd, Watson KC, Stanton FJ. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1982; 64(3): 319–337Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O’Driscoll SW, Petrie RS, Torchia ME. Arthroscopic removal of the glenoid component for failed total shoulder arthroplasty. A report of five cases. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 2005; 87(4): 858–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Petersen SA, Hawkins RJ. Revision of failed total shoulder arthroplasty. Orthop. Clin. North Am. 1998; 29(3): 519–533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rodosky M, Weinstein D, Pollock R et al. On the rarity of glenoid component failure. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1995; 4(suppl 13)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rodosky MW, Bigliani LU. Indications for glenoid resurfacing in shoulder arthroplasty. J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 1996; 5(3): 231–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bradley S. Raphael
    • 1
  • Joshua S. Dines
    • 1
  • Russell F. Warren
    • 1
  • Mark Figgie
    • 1
  • Edward V. Craig
    • 1
  • Stephen Fealy
    • 1
  • David M. Dines
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations