HSS Journal

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 70–72 | Cite as

Prolonged Operative Time Correlates with Increased Infection Rate After Total Knee Arthroplasty

  • G. Peersman
  • R. Laskin
  • J. Davis
  • M. G. E. Peterson
  • T. Richart
Research Article

Abstract

Risk stratification has proven to be a useful tool in surgical site infection prevention. The duration of the surgical procedure has been recommended for use in surgical site infection (SSI) risk stratification (Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20:247–248, 1999). A retrospective analysis of 6489 patients who underwent total knee replacement (TKR) between 1993 and 1999 assessed the association between the duration of the surgical procedure and the risk of postoperative infection. One hundred thirteen infected patients were matched with 236 controls, and nominal variables were statistically processed. Patients without infections (n = 236) had surgery durations of 94 ± 28 min, and patients with infection (n = 104) had durations of 127 ± 45 min (p < 0.001). Operation time has positive correlations with weight (r = 0.3, p < 0.001), body mass index (r = 0.3, p < 0.001), and the total number of comorbidities (r = 0.2, p < 0.001; n = 340). The results confirm that the duration of the surgical procedure can be used as a risk predictor for SSI in TKR.

Key words

TKA infection SSI risk stratification duration of surgery 

References

  1. 1.
    Brandt, C, Hansen, S, Sohr, D, Daschner, F, Ruden, H, Gastmeier, P Apr 2004Finding a method for optimizing risk adjustment when comparing surgical-site infection ratesInfect Control Hosp Epidemiol25313318Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Thomasson, E, Guingand, O, Terracher, R, Mazel, C 2001Perioperative complications after total hip revision surgery and their predictive factors. A series of 181 consecutive proceduresRev Chir Orthop87477488PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Heisel, C, Schmalzried, TP Aug 2003Incidence of serious complications after total hip replacementJ Bone Jt Surg Am85A16101611Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kessler, S, Kinkel, S, Käfer, W, Puhl, W, Schochat, T 2003Influence of operation duration on the perioperative morbidity in revision total hip arthroplastyActa Orthop Belg6932833416PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mangran, AJ, Horan, TC, Pearlson, ML, Silver, LC, Jarvis, WR 1999Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection 1999Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol20247278Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Patterson, BM, Lieberman, JR, Salvati, EA 1995Intra-operative complications during total hip arthroplastyOrthopedics1810891095PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peersman, G, Laskin, RS, Davis, J, Peterson, M Nov 2001Infection in total knee replacement: a retrospective review of 6489 total knee replacementsClin Orthop3921523Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Saleh, K, Olson, M, Resig, S, Bershadsky, B, Kuskowski, M, Gioe, T, Robinson, H, Schmidt, R, McElfresh, E 2002Predictors of wound infection in hip and knee joint replacement: results from a 20 year surveillance programJ Orthoptera Res20506515Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Strehle, J, Notaro, C, Orler, R, Isler, B 2000The outcome of revision hip arthroplasty in patients older than age 80 years: complications and social outcome of different risk groupsJ Arthroplast15690697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weaver, F, Hynes, D, Hopkinson, W, Wixson, R, Khuri, S, Daley, J, Henderson, WG Sep 2003Preoperative risks and outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty in the veteran's health administrationJ Arthroplast18693708CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Hospital for Special Surgery 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. Peersman
    • 1
  • R. Laskin
    • 2
  • J. Davis
    • 2
  • M. G. E. Peterson
    • 2
  • T. Richart
    • 1
  1. 1.ACZA Campus StuivenbergAntwerpBelgium
  2. 2.The Hospital for Special SurgeryWeill Medical School of Cornell UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations