MDMA alone affects sensorimotor and prepulse inhibition responses in mice and rats: tips in the debate on potential MDMA unsafety in human activity
MDMA is a psychoactive drug that has been increasingly abused worldwide, due to its entactogenic properties. However, concerns on its safety exist, particularly regarding its effects on attentional skills and performance. Evidence from the literature shows contrasting effects of MDMA. It generally acts as a pshychomotor stimulant, thus improving arousal and psychomotor function. However, MDMA has been demonstrated to negatively influence other skills. Consequently, human activities that require alertness, and accurate and quick reflexes (i.e. driving, operations at the workplace, etc.) could be negatively affected. In the present study, the effect of MDMA (0.1–20 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) on sensorimotor and startle/prepulse inhibition responses was evaluated in a controlled rodent experimental setting.
Sensorimotor studies, evaluation of visual, acoustic, and tactile responses, evaluation of spontaneous locomotion, startle and repulse inhibition analyses were performed in an experimental controlled rodent model (rats and mice), following the administration of MDMA (0.1–20 mg/kg) intraperitoneally.
Our findings show that all the MDMA-treated animals had impaired sensorimotor and prepulse inhibition responses compared to the control subjects at the early (5, 30 and 60 min) testing time points while all the effects disappeared, respectively, 6, 16 and 24 h post-MDMA treatment.
Within the ongoing debate on the safety of recreational abuse of MDMA, our results reveal acute prominent changes in sensorimotor and attentional performance, sensor response to external stimuli, and locomotor activity due to a single administration of a dose of MDMA (corresponding to a dose producing in humans both ‘desirable’ entactogenic effects and physiological adverse effects).
KeywordsMDMA Sensorimotor responses Attentional skills Human activities Safety
This research has been funded by the Drug Policies Department, Presidency of the Council of Ministers, Italy (project NS-Drugs to M. Marti) and by local funds from the University of Ferrara (FAR 2016 and FAR 2017 to M. Marti).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare no competing interest.
The study on animals is compliance with ethical standards.
- 1.Johnston L, O’Malley P, Bachman J, Schulenberg JE (2012) Monitoring the future: national results on adolescent drug use: overview of key findings, 2011. Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. http://www.monitoringthefuture.org/pubs/monographs/mtf-overview2015.pdf. Accessed on 10 Aug 2018
- 6.Riezzo I, Cerretani D, Fiore C, Bello S, Centini F, D’Errico S, Fiaschi AI, Giorgi G, Neri M, Pomara C, Turillazzi E, Fineschi V (2010) Enzymatic-nonenzymatic cellular antioxidant defense systems response and immunohistochemical detection of MDMA, VMAT2, HSP70, and apoptosis as biomarkers for MDMA (Ecstasy) neurotoxicity. J Neurosci Res 88:905–916Google Scholar
- 21.Cerretani D, Bello S, Cantatore S, Fiaschi AI, Montefrancesco G, Neri M, Pomara C, Riezzo I, Fiore C, Bonsignore A, Turillazzi E, Fineschi V (2011) Acute administration of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) induces oxidative stress, lipoperoxidation and TNFalpha-mediated apoptosis in rat liver. Pharmacol Res 64:517–527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hamdam J, Sethu S, Smith T, Alfirevic A, Alhaidari M, Atkinson J, Ayala M, Box H, Cross M, Delaunois A, Dermody A, Govindappa K, Guillon J-M, Jenkins R, Kenna G, Lemmer B, Meecham K, Olayanju A, Pestel S, Rothfuss A, Sidaway J, Sison-Young R, Smith E, Stebbings R, Tingle Y, Valentin J-P, Williams A, Williams D, Park K, Goldring C (2013) Safety pharmacology—current and emerging concepts. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 273:229–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 25.Canazza I, Ossato A, Trapella C, Fantinati A, De Luca MA, Margiani G, Vincenzi F, Rimondo C, Di Rosa F, Gregori A, Varani K, Borea PA, Serpelloni G, Marti M (2016) Effect of the novel synthetic cannabinoids AKB48 and 5F-AKB48 on “tetrad”, sensorimotor, neurological and neurochemical responses in mice. In vitro and in vivo pharmacological studies. Psychopharmacology 233:3685–3709CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Ossato A, Canazza I, Trapella C, Vincenzi F, De Luca MA, Rimondo C, Varani K, Borea PA, Serpelloni G, Marti M (2016) Effect of JWH-250, JWH-073 and their interaction on “tetrad”, sensorimotor, neurological and neurochemical responses in mice. Prog Neuro-Psychopharmacol Biol Psychiat 67:31–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Fantegrossi WE, Godlewski T, Karabenick RL, Stephens JM, Ullrich T, Rice KC, Woods JH (2003) Pharmacological characterization of the effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (“ecstasy”) and its enantiomers on lethality, core temperature, and locomotor activity in singly housed and crowded mice. Psychopharmacology 166:202–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 34.Esteban B, O’Shea E, Camarero J, Sanchez V, Green AR, Colado MI (2001) 3,4-Methylenedioxymethamphetamine induces monoamine release, but not toxicity, when administered centrally at a concentration occurring following a peripherally injected neurotoxic dose. Psychopharmacology 154:251–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 36.Yamamoto BK, Nash JF, Gudelsky GA (1995) Modulation of methylenedioxymethamphetamine-induced striatal dopamine release by the interaction between serotonin and gamma-aminobutyric acid in the substantia nigra. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 273:1063–1070Google Scholar
- 37.De Letter EA, Espeel MF, Craeymeersch ME, Lambert WE, Clauwaert KM, Dams R, Mortier KA, Piette MH (2003) Immunohistochemical demonstration of the amphetamine derivatives 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) and 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine (MDA) in human post-mortem brain tissues and the pituitary gland. Int J Legal Med 117:2–9Google Scholar
- 41.Kehne JH, McCloskey TC, Taylor VL, Black CK, Fadayel GM, Schmidt CJ (1992) Effects of the serotonin releasers 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), 4-chloroamphetamine (PCA) and fenfluramine on acoustic and tactile startle reflexes in rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 260:78–89Google Scholar
- 51.Sprague JE, Everman SL, Nichols DE (1998) An integrated hypothesis for the serotonergic axonal loss induced by 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine. Neurotoxicology 19:427–441Google Scholar
- 54.McCreary AC, Bankson MG, Cunningham KA (1999) Pharmacological studies of the acute and chronic effects of (+)-3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine on locomotor activity: role of 5-hydroxytryptamine(1A) and 5-hydroxytryptamine(1B/1D) receptors. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 290:965–973Google Scholar
- 55.Lebsanft HB, Mayerhofer A, Kovar KA, Schmidt WJ (2003) Is the Ecstasy-induced ipsilateral rotation in 6-hydroxydopamine unilaterally lesioned rats dopamine independent? J Neural Transm 110:707–718Google Scholar
- 61.Santacroce R, Ruiz Bennasar C, Sancho Jaraiz JR, Fiori F, Sarchione F, Angelini F, Catalano G, Carenti ML, Corkery JM, Schifano F, Di Giannantonio M, Martinotti G (2017) A matter of life and death: substance-caused and substance-related fatalities in Ibiza in 2015. Human Psychopharmacol 32(3):e2592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 62.Ramaekers JG, Kuypers KP, Bosker WM, Brookhuis KA, Veldstra JA, Simons R, Martens M, Hjälmdahl M, Forsman A, Knoche A (2012) Effects of stimulant drugs on actual and simulated driving: perspectives from four experimental studies conducted as part of the DRUID research consortium. Psychopharmacology 222:413–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar