Advertisement

Forensic Toxicology

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 31–35 | Cite as

Cannabinoid contents in cannabis products seized in São Paulo, Brazil, 2006–2007

  • Gabriela Lopes de Oliveira
  • Marcelo Henrique Voloch
  • Gisela Bernete Sztulman
  • Osvaldo Negrini Neto
  • Mauricio YonamineEmail author
Short Communication

Abstract

A rapid and simple method was optimized for determination of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), cannabidiol (CBD), and cannabinol (CBN) contents in cannabis products by gas chromatography with flame-ionization detection (GC-FID), using diazepam as internal standard. All parameters of validation of the method such as linearity, intraassay precision, and limits of detection and quantification of the analytes were satisfactory. Using the described method, cannabinoid contents of 55 cannabis product samples seized in São Paulo City, Brazil, in 2006 and 2007 were measured. Δ9-THC content in marijuana and hashish samples varied between 0.08% and 5.5%, with an average of 2.5%. The phenotypic ratio showed that the products were able to be designated as “drug type.”

Keywords

Cannabinoid content Cannabis seizure Marijuana Gas chromatography Tetrahydrocannabinol Cannabidiol 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Stolker AAM, van Schoonhoven J, Vries AJ, Bobeldijk-Pastorova I, Vaes WHJ, van den Berg R (2004) Determination of cannabinoids in cannabis products using liquid chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1058: 143–151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Drummer OH (2001) The forensic pharmacology of drugs of abuse. Oxford University Press Oxford, pp 177–195Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Reinhardt VED, Midio AF (1993) Características botânicas, químicas e produtos obtidos da Cannabis. Rev Farm Bioquím Univ S Paulo 29:55–61Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lewis R, Ward S, Johnson R, Burns DT (2005) Distribution of the principal cannabinoids within bars of compressed cannabis resin. Anal Chim Acta 538:399–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gambaro V, Dell’ Acqua L, Farè F, Froldi R, Saligari E, Tassoni G (2002) Determination of active constituents in Cannabis preparations by high-resolution gas chromatography/flame ionization detection and high-performance liquid chromatography/UV detection. Anal Chim Acta 468: 245–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ross SA, Mehmedic Z, Murphy TP, ElSohly MA (2000) GC-MS analysis of the total Δ9-THC content of both drug-and fiber-type cannabis seeds. J Anal Toxicol 24:715–717PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lachenmeier DW, Kroener L, Musshoff F, Madea B (2004) Determination of cannabinoids in hemp food products by use of headspace solid-phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 378: 183–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hewavitharana AK, Golding G, Tempany G, King G, Holling N (2005) Quantitative GC-MS analysis of D9-tetrahydrocannabinol in fiber hemp varieties. J Anal Toxicol 29:258–261PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pellegrini M, Marchei E, Pacifici R, Pichini S (2005) A rapid and simple procedure for the determination of cannabinoids in hemp food products by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Pharm Biomed Anal 36:939–946PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stefanidou M, Dona A, Athanaselis S, Papoutsis I, Koutselinis A (1998) The cannabinoid content of marihuana samples seized in Greece and its forensic application. Forensic Sci Int 95:153–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ilias Y, Rudaz S, Mathieu P, Christen P, Veuthey JL (2005) Extraction and analysis of different Cannabis samples by headspace solid-phase microextraction combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Sep Sci 28:2293.2300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    United Nations Office for Drug Control and Crime Prevention (UNODCCP) (2007) World drug report 2007. Oxford University Press OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hall W, Swift W (2000) The THC content of cannabis in Australia: evidence and implications. Aust NZ J Public Health 24:503–508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Potter DJ, Clark P, Brown MB (2008) Potency of Δ9-THC and other cannabinoids in Cannabis in England in 2005: implications for psychoactivity and pharmacology. J Forensic Sci 53:90–94PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    ElSohly MA, Ross SA, Mehmedic Z, Arafat R, Yi B, Banahan BFB (2000) Potency trends of Δ9-THC and other cannabinoids in confiscated marijuana from 1980–1997. J Forensic Sci 45:24–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Poulsen HA, Sutherland GJ (2000) The potency of cannabis in New Zealand from 1976 to 1996. Sci Justice 40:171–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pijlman FTA, Rigter SM, Hoek J, Goldschmidt HMJ, Niesink RJM (2005) Strong increase in total delta-THC in cannabis preparations sold in Dutch coffee shops. Addict Biol 10: 171–180PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Japanese Association of Forensic Toxicology 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Lopes de Oliveira
    • 1
  • Marcelo Henrique Voloch
    • 1
  • Gisela Bernete Sztulman
    • 1
  • Osvaldo Negrini Neto
    • 1
  • Mauricio Yonamine
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Centro de Exames, Análises e PesquisasInstituto de CriminalísticaSão Paulo, SPBrazil
  2. 2.Departamento de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas, Faculdade de Ciências FarmacêuticasUniversidade de São PauloSão Paulo, SPBrazil

Personalised recommendations