Peer Reactions, Peer Behavior, Student Attitudes, and Student Deviance: a Comparison of College Students in Japan and the USA
This study presents evidence on the cross-cultural generalizability of differential association/social learning theory by testing whether the causal processes of learning attitudes toward deviance, posited by the theory, are equally applicable, and the causal links, specified by the theory, are equally strong in two diverse cultures—the USA and Japan. Drawing on the literature concerning cultural variability in individualism-collectivism, we predicted that the effects of peer reactions to deviance and peer deviance on a person’s attitudes toward deviance should be stronger in Japan than in the USA, and that the mediating effect of a person’s attitudes on the relationship of peer reactions and peer deviance to a person’s deviance should be weaker among Japanese than among Americans. Analyses of comparable survey data from college students in the USA (N = 625) and Japan (N = 591) provide generally supportive, but somewhat mixed, evidence regarding our predictions. In both countries, peer reactions to deviance predicted student attitudes toward deviance more strongly than did peer deviance. Peer deviance strongly predicted student deviance, while peer reactions to deviance predicted less strongly, and the effects were mediated by student attitudes in both countries. Contrary to the hypotheses, peer reactions and peer deviance did not predict student attitudes more strongly in Japan than in the USA. Also, peer deviance predicted student deviance more strongly in the USA than in Japan. In agreement with the expectations, the relation between student attitudes and student deviance was stronger in the USA than in Japan.
KeywordsUSA-Japan comparison Peer reactions Peer behavior Student attitudes Student deviance
We wish to thank Marvin D. Krohn for his comments on the manuscript and his contribution to the data collection in the USA. We are also appreciative of the generosity of Ronald L. Akers in sharing the questionnaire used for the Boys Town Study. Additionally, we are grateful for the suggestions and insights on earlier versions of the manuscript from Harold G. Grasmick.
The research reported here was supported by the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No. 17K04095) from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Akers, R. L. (1985). Deviant behavior: a social learning approach (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Akers, R. L. (1998). Social learning and social structure: a general theory of crime and deviance. Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
- Akers, R. L., Sellers, C. S., & Jennings, W. G. (2017). Criminological theories: introduction, evaluation, and application (7th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Doi, T. (1971). The anatomy of dependence. New York: Kodansha International.Google Scholar
- Dussich, J. P. J., Friday, P. C., Okada, T., Yamagami, A., & Knutdenm, R. (2001). Different responses to violence in Japan and America. Monsey: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
- Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gudykunst, W. B., & Nishida, T. (1994). Bridging Japanese/North American differences. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Hashimoto, A., & Traphagan, J. W. (2008). Imagined families, lived families: culture and kinship in contemporary Japan. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
- Hofstede, G., & Hofstede, G. J. (2005). Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Iwao, S. (1993). The Japanese woman: traditional image and changing reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Kerbo, H. R., & McKinstry, J. (1997). Modern Japan: a volume in the comparative societies series. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Matsumoto, D. (2006). The new Japan: debunking seven cultural stereotypes. Boston: Intercultural Press.Google Scholar
- Matsumoto, D., & Juang, L. (2012). Cultural psychology (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
- Sengoku, T. (2005). Nihon no joshi chuukousei [Female junior/high school students in Japan]. Tokyo: NHK Books.Google Scholar
- Statistics Bureau. (2015). The number of households. The Japanese Bureau of Census. Tokyo, Japan: Statistics Bureau, the Japanese Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications. Retrieved from http://www.stat.go.jp/data/kokusei/2015/kekka/kihon3/pdf/gaiyou.pdf.
- Statistics Bureau. (2017). The numbers of foreign residents in Japan. The number of foreign residents in Japan. Tokyo, Japan: Japanese Ministry of Justice. Retrieved from http://www.moj.go.jp/content/001238032.pdf
- Sugimoto, Y. (2003). An introduction to Japanese society (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Sutherland, E. H. (1947). Principles of criminology (4th ed.). Chicago: J.B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
- The Japan Association of National Universities. (2017). Female ratio transition at Japanese national universities. A follow-up research on promotion of gender equality. Retrieved from http://www.janu.jp/gender/201801houkoku_gaiyou.pdf.
- Tittle, C. R. (1980). Sanctions and social deviance: the question of social deterrence. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
- Tittle, C. R., & Paternoster, R. (2000). Social deviance and crime: an organizational and theoretical approach. Los Angeles: Roxbury.Google Scholar
- U.S. Census. (2016a). The majority of children live with two parents. Census Bureau Reports, November 2016. Washington, DC: USA. Department of Commerce: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2016/cb16-192.html.
- U.S. Census. (2016b). Race and Hispanic origin. Census Bureau Reports, July 2016. Washington, DC: USA. Department of Commerce: U.S. Census Bureau. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/RHI125216#viewtop.
- Vazsonyi, A. T. (2003). Comparative criminology: content or simply methodology. In C. L. Britt & M. R. Gottfredson (Eds.), Control theories of crime and delinquency: advances in criminological theory (Vol. 12, pp. 179–211). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
- Wang, S., & Jensen, G. F. (2003). Explaining delinquency in Taiwan: a test of social learning theory. In R. L. Akers & G. F. Jensen (Eds.), Social learning theory and the explanation of crime: a guide for the new century (pp. 65–83). New Brunswick: Transaction.Google Scholar