Asian Journal of Criminology

, Volume 9, Issue 2, pp 103–124 | Cite as

Reforming the Criminal Evidence System in China

Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:

Abstract

Since 1997, China has proposed to reform the judicial system. In 2007, China officially set its goal of judicial reform as to “establish a Socialist Judicial System with fairness, efficiency and authority”. Now that the goal of judicial reform has been firmly established, the key question is how to accomplish that goal. One view advocates achieving judicial reform through administrative measures. A different path, which we proposed, is to accomplish the goal of judicial reform through reinforcing the construction of evidence system. Through analyzing the current law and investigating some judicial cases, the study found that the main reason for issues of judicial unfairness and corruption in current China is due to neglect of the construction of evidence system, and the current evidence rules contain too many problems, and the aforementioned problems have become a bottleneck for China's judicial reform and an important reason for China to reconstruct the whole evidence system. Therefore, in the long run, it would be ideal for legislature to promulgate a unified code of evidence law, but it is an extremely difficult task to coordinate the relationship between evidence law and three major procedural laws. In the short term, the most feasible compromise is to have the Supreme People's Court promulgate People's Court provisions on Evidence. After repeated test through the trials, we believe that such a unified People's Court provisions on Evidence will dramatically improve the evidence system and promote judicial fairness and the reform of legal education in China.

Keywords

Judicial reform Administrativization of justice Reforming the criminal evidence system Reforming the whole evidence system People's Court provisions on Evidence 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Allen, R. J. (2010a). The theoretical foundations and implications of evidence. Evidence Science, 18(4), 485–494.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, R. J. (2010b). The relationships among evidence law, procedural law and substantive law. Evidence Science, 18(6), 750–760.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, R. J., Kuhns, R. B., Swift, E., Schwartz, D. S., & Pardo, M. S. (2011). Evidence, text, problems, and cases. New York: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  4. Bayles, M. D. (1987). Principles of law (a normative analysis). Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergland, D., Zhang, B., & Zheng, L. (2007). Value analysis of evidence law. In H. Jiahong (Ed.), Forum of evidence (Vol. 13, pp. 125–132). Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bian, J., & Yao, L. (1999). Reflection on establishment and improvement of China's evidence rules. Studies in Law and Business, 15(5), 5–7.Google Scholar
  7. Capowski, J. J. (2009) China's uniform provisions of evidence of the People's Court and the convergence of civil and common law. Widener Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series No. 09-10, p. 9Google Scholar
  8. Chen, G. (Ed.). (2004). Criminal evidence law of the People's Republic of China. Beijing: Press of China University of Political Science & Law.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, X. (2005). Cuo an he yi xing zheng (How do miscarriages of justice come about?). Gongan xuekan (Public Security Science Journal), 5(13).Google Scholar
  10. Chen, W. (2008). Comparative analysis of system of judges' specified number of personnel. Journal of Tianjin University (Social Science), 10(4), 352–355.Google Scholar
  11. Chen, Y. (2009). To regulate working activities and adjust occupational disciplines, the Supreme People's Court Issuing Provisions of “Five Prohibitions”. Resource document. China Court. http://www.chinacourt.org/public/detail.php?id=339384. Accessed 4 Sept 2012.
  12. Chen, G. (2010a). Some issues in reform of criminal justice. In: C Guangzhong. Legal works by Guangzhong Chen (vol.1) (pp: 0490–0495). Beijing: Press of China University of Political Science & Law.Google Scholar
  13. Chen, G. (2010b). Discussion on several problems of judicial authority. In: 2010 Collection of Papers for Annual Meeting by Legal Department of Social Science Council in Ministry of Education and for 9 + 1 Meeting of Directors of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences (Law) in Ministry of Education and Seminar of China's Judicial Reform (pp: 5–10).Google Scholar
  14. Chen, G. (2010c). Great achievement of reforming and improving criminal procedural system. Resource document. Dongfangfayan. http://www.dffy.com/faxuejieti/ss/201005/20100531160553.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2012.
  15. Chen, R. (2012). On the remedial rules of the flawed evidence. The Jurist, 131(2), 66–84.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, D., & Wang, C. (Journalists). (2011). The first emergence of “Exclusion of Evidence Provided by the Prosecutor” in Zhejiang—the appliance of provisions on the exclusion of illegal evidence still needs the guarantee of coordinating mechanism. Resource document. Legaldaily. http://www.legaldaily.com.cn/index_article/content/2011-08/24/content_2896677.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2012.
  17. Cui, J. (2010). My opinions on Provisions on Evidence in Death Sentence Cases and Provisions on the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence. Resource document. Dongfangfayan. http://www.dffy.com/faxuejieti/ss/201006/20100601194631.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2012.
  18. Dai, L., & Jiao, H. (2010). Absence of judges mastering evidence science in court resulting in misjudged cases: possibility of promoting the talents training model—Jilin Supreme Court Coordinating with China University of Political Science and Law to Bring up Experts of Evidence Science. Legal Daily (weekend), p.A 7.Google Scholar
  19. Daum J. (2010-2011) Tortuous progress: early cases under China's new procedures for excluding evidence in criminal cases. New York University Journal of International Law and Policy 43: 699–712.Google Scholar
  20. Dictionary Editorial Office, Institute of Language, the China Academy of Social Sciences (Ed.). (2002). The modern Chinese Dictionary (2002 supplement). Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
  21. Du, M. (2010). Interpretation by Chongyi Fan of Provisions on Evidence in Death Sentence Cases and Provisions on the Exclusion of Illegal Evidence. Resource document. Dongfangfayan. http://www.dffy.com/fazhixinwen/lifa/201005/20100530153708.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2012.
  22. Fang, B. (2007). The reality is there—on China's local rules on criminal evidence. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 25(3), 41–42.Google Scholar
  23. Gao, T. (2011). Study on judge-allocating system. Journal of China Three Gorges University (Humanity and Social Science), 33(1), 76–82.Google Scholar
  24. Intermediate People's Court of Baiyin City in Gansu Province (2011). No. 5 Criminal Court verdict . Resource document. Quoted from Peking University Law Information: http://vip.chinalawinfo.com/newlaw2002/slc/slc.asp?db=fnl&gid=117826398. Accessed 4 Sept 2011.
  25. Intermediate People's Court of Xuzhou City in Jiangsu Province. No. 23 Criminal Court Verdict Resource document. Quoted from Peking University Law Information: http://vip.chinalawinfo.com/newlaw2002/slc/slc.asp?db=fnl&gid=117795276. Accessed 4 Sep 2011.
  26. Jiao, H., & Mo, J. (2009). Prequel to evidence science judge: the unique class in China for Jurist Master of Forensic Science Begins. Legal Daily (weekend), p.A16.Google Scholar
  27. Lewis, M. K. (2010-2011) Controlling abuse to maintain control: the exclusionary rule in China. New York University Journal of International Law and Policy, 43: 630–697.Google Scholar
  28. Li, X. (1991). Construction of criminal procedure. Beijing: Press of China University of Political Science & Law.Google Scholar
  29. MacCormick, N. (1978). Legal reasoning and legal theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  30. Pan, J. (2001). The system of high salary: the basic guarantee of fair judgment, incorruption and high quality of the judge. Tribune of Political Science and Law, 18(6), 15–21.Google Scholar
  31. Posner, R. A. (1994). The problems of jurisprudence. Su Li (trans.). Press of China University of Political Science & Law.Google Scholar
  32. Qi, S., & Zhong, S. (1998). The impact of the civil trial procedure reform on the evidence system in China. Law Review, 15(4), 106–111.Google Scholar
  33. Qin, H. (2009). The Jurist Huixing Liang: unbearable judicial corruption. The Southern Metropolis Daily, p.A3.Google Scholar
  34. Shi, Y. (2010). The promoted misjudged case. Southern Metropolis Daily (Depth Weekly), p.A5.Google Scholar
  35. Supreme People's Court. (2010) Annual Report on Work of People's Court. (http://www.court.gov.cn/qwfb/sfsj/201105/t20110525_100996.htm. Accessed 25 May 2011.
  36. Tan, M. (2002). The Supreme People's Court getting castrated by himself in the case of Hangqi Fan. Resource document. Peking University Law Information. http://vip.chinalawinfo.com/newlaw2002/slc/slc.asp?db=art&gid=335600999. Accessed 4 Sept 2011.
  37. Walker, J., & Chase, O. G. (2010). Common law, civil law and the future of categories. Toronto: LexisNexis Canada Inc.Google Scholar
  38. Walkker, D. M. (2003). The Oxford companion to law. Shuangyuan Li (trans.). Beijing: Law Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wang, X. (2010). Those “murderers” given death sentences with a reprieve. Oriental Outlook, 10(28), 36–40.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, H., & He, X. (Journalist). (2010). The case of Fan Qihang entering death penalty review, lawyers meeting videos revealed. Resource document. Sina.com. http://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/20100728/11118378450.shtml. Accessed 4 Sept 2011.
  41. Wu, H. (2000, December 11). Imperative: China's legislation of evidence. People's Court Daily, p.A3.Google Scholar
  42. Wu, W., & Bekken, T. V. (2010). Police torture in China and its causes: a review of literature. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 43(3), 557.Google Scholar
  43. Xiao, Y. (2006). The Chief Judge Xiao Yang: China keeps strengthening the reform of evidence system. Resource document. Xinhua News. http://big5.gov.cn/gate/big5/www.gov.cn/jrzg/2006-05/30/content_295901.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2011.
  44. Xu, G. (2007). The President dealing with big and important cases in person reflecting the administrative justice. Resource document. China. http://www.china.com.cn/review/txt/2007-06/13/content_8380792.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2011.
  45. Xu, Y. (2010) The Supreme People's Court requiring to accelerate judicial reform, ensuring to guarantee judicial fairness. Resource document. Renmin News. http://politics.people.com.cn/GB/1026/11856735.html. Accessed 4 Sept 2011.
  46. Yang, S. (2011). Survey of nationwide courts implementing “The Two Provisions”. Resource document. People's Court Daily. http://www.court.gov.cn/xwzx/yw/201104/t20110419_19642.htm. Accessed 4 Sept 2011.
  47. Zhang, W. (2001). Study on category of philosophy of law. Beijing: Press of China University of Political Science & Law.Google Scholar
  48. Zhang, B. (Ed.). (2008a). Proposal for judicial interpretations and drafting commentary of “Uniform Provisions of Evidence of the People's Court”. Beijing: Press of China University of Political Science and Law.Google Scholar
  49. Zhang, B. (2008b). Value basis and theoretical system of evidence rules. Chinese Journal of Law, 15(2), 122–132.Google Scholar
  50. Zhang, B. (2009). Evidence law. Beijing: Press of China University of Political Science and Law.Google Scholar
  51. Zhang, W. (2010). Theory and practice of China's judicial reform—mainly focus on the reform of People's Court. 2010 Collection of Papers for Annual Conference by Legal Department of Social Science Council in Ministry of Education and for 9+1 Meeting of Directors of Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences (Law) in Ministry of Education and Seminar of China's Judicial Reform.Google Scholar
  52. Zhang, N., & Walton, D. (2010) Recent trends in evidence law in China and the new evidence scholarship. unpublished paper, 5. www.dougwalton.ca/papers%20in%20pdf/10ChinaEvidence.pdf.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.China University of Political Science and Law (CUPL)BeijingChina
  2. 2.Key Laboratory of Evidence Science (CUPL)Ministry of EducationBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations