Asian Journal of Criminology

, Volume 8, Issue 2, pp 129–142 | Cite as

A Green Criminological Exploration of Illegal Wildlife Trade in Vietnam



Illegal wildlife trade is a pervasive and destructive crime that is contributing to biodiversity loss and species extinction around the globe. This is particularly true in Vietnam where, it is proposed, the convergence of four factors creates the conditions for the illegal wildlife trade to flourish. The human-centered approach to Vietnam’s diverse ecosystem, historic consumption of wildlife, rapidly developing economy, and embryonic environmental legislation has resulted in the continued degradation of a unique and important environment. Furthermore, until recently criminological research of such green crimes has either been lacking or equally human-centered. This article details the nature and extent of wildlife trafficking in Vietnam and introduces to this context an expanded notion of harm, including the environment and other species, of a green criminological perspective to this exploration. The aim is that, by proposing a new framework in which to evaluate the illegal wildlife trade and other green crimes in Vietnam, new and innovative strategies addressing the convergent factors might be developed that will aid in stopping the illegal wildlife trade and other green crimes.


Vietnam Green criminology Illegal wildlife trade Wildlife trafficking 


  1. Asian Development Bank (2005a). Vietnam: Country Environmental Analysis, Asian Development Bank, Hanoi. Accessed 12 June 2011.
  2. Asian Development Bank (2005b). GMS (Greater Mekong Subregion) Biodiversity conservation corridors initiative, strategy framework and technical assessment. Asian Development Bank, Hanoi. Accessed 08 June 2011.
  3. Barber-Meyer, S. M. (2010). Dealing with the clandestine nature of wildlife-trade market. Conservation Biology, 24(4), 918–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beirne, P., & South, N. (2007). Introduction: Approaching green criminology. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in green criminology confronting harms against environments, humanity and other animals (pp. xiii–xxii). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  5. Blevins, K. R., & Edwards, T. D. (2009). Wildlife crime. In J. M. Miller (Ed.), 21st century criminology: A reference handbook (pp. 557–563). California: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brack, D. (2009). Combating international environmental crime. In R. White (Ed.), Environmental crime, a reader (pp. 485–492). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Broad, S., Mulliken, T., & Roe, D. (2003). The nature and extent of legal and illegal trade in wildlife. In S. Oldfield (Ed.), The trade in wildlife: Regulation for conservation (pp. 3–22). London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  8. Bryant, T., & Akers, K. (1999). Environmental Controls In Vietnam. Available at SSRN: Scholar
  9. Carrabine, E., Iganski, P., Lee, M., Plummer, K., & South, N. (2004). Criminology: A sociological introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. CITES (Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species) (2008). Report on the review of Vietnam’s wildlife trade policy, CITES Vietnam, Hanoi. Accessed 20 July 2011.
  11. Craig, D. (2002). Familiar medicine: Everyday health knowledge and practice in today’s Vietnam. University of Hawaii: Honolulu. Accessed 23 July 2011.
  12. Dang, H. H., & Dang, H. P. (2010). ‘Profits, management and the control over illegal wildlife trade in Vietnam’, National Conference of Prevention and Combat the Offence Against Wildlife, Biodiversity and Natural Preservation, Environmental Protection Department: Hanoi, Vietnam, pp13-20, in Vietnamese.Google Scholar
  13. Drury, R. C. (2009). ‘Identifying and understanding consumers of wild animal products in Hanoi, Vietnam: Implication for conservation management’. The Degree of Doctor of Philosophy: University College London. Accessed 06 July 2011.
  14. Eman, K., Meško, G., & Fields, C. B. (2009). Crimes against the environment: green criminology and research challenges in Slovenia. Journal of Criminal Justice and Security, Year 11(4), 574–592.Google Scholar
  15. EJF (Environment Justice Foundation) (2011). Why is wildlife traded, media release, Environment Justice Foundation. Accessed 23 August 2011.
  16. Environmental Police (2010). “Ministry of Public Security issued Decision No. 449 regulating the functions, duties, powers and organizational structure of the Department of Environmental Crime Prevention and Combat Police” Accessed 23 September 2012.
  17. Foley, K. E., Stengel, C. J., & Shepherd, C. R. (2011). Pills, powders, vials and flakes: The bear bile trade in Asia. Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia: TRAFFIC Southeast Asia.Google Scholar
  18. FPD (Forest Protection Department) (2003). Evaluation of the wildlife trade in Na Hang District, Forest Protection Department: Hanoi, Vietnam. Accessed 22 July 2011.
  19. GDE (General Department of Environment) (2005). ‘National Report of Environmental Status in 2005’, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development: Hanoi, Vietnam, in Vietnamese. Accessed 12 July 2011.
  20. GDF (General Department of Forestry) (2010). ‘Legal provisions on the management and license for wildlife trade, transport, export and import- current situation and measures to improve the management of the illegal wildlife trade’, National Conference of Prevention and Combat the Offence Against Wildlife, Biodiversity and Natural Preservation, Environmental Protection Department: Hanoi, Vietnam, pp25-30, in Vietnamese.Google Scholar
  21. GDS (General Department of Statistics of Vietnam) (2009) National Statistics of Vietnam, General Department of Statistics. Accessed 23 June 2011, in Vietnamese.
  22. Halsey, M. (2004). Against ‘green’ criminology. British Journal of Criminology, 44(6), 833–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heckenberg, D. (2009). Studying environmental crime: Key works, acronyms and sources. In R. White (Ed.), Environmental crime, a reader (pp. 9–24). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  24. Herbig, F. J. W., & Joubert, S. J. (2009). Criminological semantics: Conservation criminology – vision or vagar. In R. White (Ed.), Environmental crime, a reader (pp. 50–62). Cullompton: Willan Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Lin, J. (2005). ‘Tackling Southeast Asia’s illegal wildlife trade’, Singapore Year Book of International Law and Contributors, pp.191–208. Accessed 12 June 2011.
  26. Lynch, M. (1990). The greening of criminology: a perspective for the 1990’s. The Critical Criminologist, 2(3), 1–4. and 11–12.Google Scholar
  27. MNRE (Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment) (2006). ‘Vietnam’s National Capacity Needs Self-Assessment for Global Environmental Management’, Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment: Hanoi. Accessed 23 June 2011.
  28. MPI (Ministry of Planning and Investigation) (2008). ‘Vietnam continues to achieve the millennium development goals’, Ministry of Planning and Investigation: Hanoi, Vietnam. Accessed 12 July 2011.
  29. Ngo, Q. D. (2010). ‘Combating environmental crime in the area of import and export’, Baomoi. Accessed 23 August 2011, in Vietnamese.
  30. Nguyen, M. D. (1985). Culture shock – a review of Vietnamese culture and its concepts of health and disease. The Western Journal of Medicine, 142(3), 409–412.Google Scholar
  31. Nguyen, V. S. (2003). ‘Vietnam’s illegal trade in wildlife: why it flourishes’, NO2003-RR6, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia, Hanoi, Vietnam.;h=repec:eep:report:rr2003111. Accessed 23 June 2011.
  32. Nguyen, M. H. (2004). Status of the illegal trade in some mammals in Vietnam. Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development, 8(44), 1148–1149.Google Scholar
  33. Nguyen, X. T. (2006). A glimpse of the traditional medicines of animal origin. Hanoi, Vietnam: Global Publications.Google Scholar
  34. Nguyen, V. S. (2008). Wildlife trading in Vietnam: situation, causes, and solutions. Journal of Science and Development, pp. 99–111.Google Scholar
  35. Nguyen, D. N. V., & Nguyen, T. (2008). ‘An overview of the use of plants and animals in traditional medicine systems in Vietnam’ A TRAFFIC Southeast Asia Report. Accessed 11 July 2011.
  36. Nijman, V. (2010). An overview of international wildlife trade from southeast Asia. Biodiversity and Conservation, 19, 1101–1114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pham, T. T., & Rambo, T. (2003). Environmental consciousness in Vietnam. Southeast Asian Studies, 41, 76–100.Google Scholar
  38. Pires, S. F., & Moreto, W. D. (2011). Preventing wildlife crimes: solutions that can overcome the “tragedy of the commons”. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 17(2), 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. PDEP (Police Department of Environmental Protection) (2010). ‘Prevention and Combat against infringements of wildlife protection, natural and biodiversity preservation’, National Conference of Prevention and Combat the Offence Against Wildlife, Biodiversity and Natural Preservation, Environmental Protection Department: Hanoi, Vietnam, pp7-12, in Vietnamese.Google Scholar
  40. Prieksat, J. (2009). ‘International Trade and Trafficking in Wildlife: The Value of Biodiversity CITES, and Going Further’, International Environmental Law. Accessed 19 June 2011.
  41. Quang Tri Province Police (2010). ‘Co-ordinate relationships between agencies: environmental protection police, customs, forest rangers and border guard in the prevention, detection and combating of illegal wildlife trafficking activities’, National Conference of Prevention and Combat the Offence Against Wildlife, Biodiversity and Natural Preservation, Environmental Protection Department: Hanoi, Vietnam, pp101-104, in Vietnamese.Google Scholar
  42. Schneider, J. L. (2009). Reducing the illicit trade in endangered wildlife: The market reduction approach. In R. White (Ed.), Environmental crime, a reader (pp. 587–607). Collumpton: Willan.Google Scholar
  43. South, N. (1998). A green field for criminology?: A proposal for a perspective. Theoretical Criminology, 2(2), 211–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sumrall, K. A. (2009). ‘Confronting Illegal Wildlife Trade in Vietnam: The Experience of Education for Nature-Vietnam’, Degree of Master of Science (Environmental Policy) in the University of Michigan. Accessed 25 July 2011.
  45. TRAFFIC (2007). ‘A matter of attitude of the consumption of wildlife in VN’. Published by TRAFFIC Southeast Asia, Greater Mekong Programme, Ha Noi, Viet Nam.Google Scholar
  46. TRAFFIC (2008). ‘What’s driving the wildlife trade? A review of expert opinion on economic and social drivers of the wildlife trade and trade control efforts in Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao PDR and Vietnam’, TRAFFIC, Washington DC. Accessed 23 June 2011.
  47. Tran, C. K. (2005). ‘Access to Medicinal Plant Resources in Vietnam - A Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits’, Centre for Research and Development of Ethno-medicinal Plant. Accessed 8 June 2011.
  48. Tran, M. H. (2010). ‘Causes, conditions, features, and a number of methods, tricks of illegal wildlife trade’, National Conference of Prevention and Combat the Offence Against Wildlife, Biodiversity and Natural Preservation, Environmental Protection Department: Hanoi, Vietnam, pp121-126, in Vietnamese.Google Scholar
  49. Vantomme, P., Markkula, A., & Leslie, R. N. (Eds.) (2002). Non-wood Forest Products in 15 Countries of Tropical Asia - An Overview. FAO, Rome, Italy. Accessed 24 August 2011.
  50. VNU (Vietnam National University – Ho Chi Minh city) (2011). ‘Consumption wild animal products in Ho Chi Minh City’, the research report, Vietnam National University, Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam. Accessed 23 July 2011.
  51. Vu, D. H. (2010). ‘Difficulties, challenges and recommendations for the preventing, combating and handling violations against natural conservation and biodiversity’, National Conference of Prevention and Combat the Offence Against Wildlife, Biodiversity and Natural Preservation, Environmental Protection Department: Hanoi, Vietnam, pp 83–88 in Vietnamese.Google Scholar
  52. Warchol, G. L. (2004). The transnational illegal wildlife trade. Criminal Justice Studies, 17, 57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. White, R. (2007). Green criminology and the pursuit of social and ecological justice. In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in Green Criminology: Confronting harms against the environments, humanity and other animals (pp. 32–54). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  54. White, R. (2009). Introduction: Environmental crime and eco-global criminology. In R. White (Ed.), Environmental crime, a reader (pp. 1–8). Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  55. World Bank (2005a). Vietnam environment monitor 2005, biodiversity’, World Bank. Accessed 12 June 2011.
  56. World Bank (2005b).Going, Going, Gone: The Illegal Trade in Wildlife in East and Southeast Asia’, Environmental and Social Development East Asia and Pacific Region Discussion Paper, World Bank. Accessed 26 June 2012.
  57. World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) (2011). Javan rhinoceros, WWF. Accessed 2 September 2011.
  58. Wyatt, T. (2009). Exploring the organization of Russia Far East’s illegal wildlife trade: two case studies of the illegal fur and illegal falcon trades. Global Crime, Special Issue: Illegal Markets and the Economics of Organized Crime, 10(1–2), 144–154.Google Scholar
  59. Wyler, L., & Sheikh, P. (2008). ‘International Illegal Trade in Wildlife: Threats and U.S. Policy’, Order Code RL34395 Congressional Research Service. Accessed 14 August 2011.
  60. Zeller, F. (2006). ‘Illegal wildlife trade takes heavy toll in Vietnam’, Cosmos. Accessed 23 August 2011.
  61. Zimmerman, M. (2003). The black market for wildlife: combating transnational organized crime in the illegal wildlife trade. Transnational Law, 36, 1672–1673.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Northumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations