Training Needs of Peer and Non-Peer Transition Service Providers: Results of a National Survey
Participatory action research processes guided a national online survey of service providers working with transition age youth with mental health challenges. The survey investigated transition service providers’ ratings of the importance of competencies and skills, self-assessed need for training in these competencies and skills, their preferred training modalities, and obstacles to engaging in training. The 254 participants identified trauma-informed care, understanding youth culture, promoting natural supports, and using culturally responsive practices as most important training needs. Age, years in current job, years in transition work, and race/ethnicity predicted training needs regarding some competencies and skills. Peer providers expressed preferences for young adult-led training. Qualitative responses highlighted training needs for supporting specific underserved populations: youth from communities of color, LGBTQ youth, and those with co-occurring disorders. Results may guide future training initiatives for peer support and non-peer support providers and workforce development initiatives designed to improve behavioral health services for young people.
The authors express appreciation to the Youth MOVE National Best Practice Committee for their thoughtful contributions to this study.
This research and preparation of this manuscript was supported by grants from the National Institute of Disability and Rehabilitation Research, US Department of Education, and the Center for Mental Health Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services (NIDRR grant H133B140039) and the National Institute of Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research, and the Center for Mental Health Services Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services (NIDILRR grant 90RT5030).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 3.Davis M, Green M, Hoffman C. The service system obstacle course for transition-age youth and young adults. In: HB Clark, DK Unruh (Eds). Transition of Youth and Young Adults with Emotional or Behavioral Difficulties: An Evidence-supported Handbook. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes, 2009, pp. 25–49.Google Scholar
- 7.Heisler EJ, Bagalman E. The mental health workforce: A primer. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, 2015. Available online at https://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2415&context=key_workplace. Accessed November 24, 2018.
- 9.Daniels A, Grant E, Filson B, et al. (Eds). Pillars of Peer Support: Transforming Mental Health Systems of Care through Peer Support Services, 2010. Available online at http://www.pillarsofpeersupport.org/final%20%20PillarsofPeerSupportService%20Report.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2018.
- 10.Walker J, Jivanjee P, Brennan EM, et al. Building Competencies and Skills among Service Providers Working with Young People who Experience Serious Mental Health Conditions: State of the Science. Portland, OR: Research and Training Center for Pathways to Positive Futures, 2018. Available at https://www.pathwaysrtc.pdx.edu/state-of-the-science-articles-2018-pttp. Accessed November 24, 2018.
- 18.Cross TL, Friesen BJ, Jivanjee P, et al. Defining youth success using community-based participatory research methods. Best Practices in Mental Health. 2011; 7(1): 94–114.Google Scholar
- 25.Astroth KA, Garza P, Taylor B. Getting down to business: Defining competencies for entry-level youth workers. New Directions for Youth Development. 2004; 104: 25–37.Google Scholar
- 27.Sellmaier C, Jivanjee P, Brennan EM, et al. Development and testing of the Transition Service Provider Competency Scale. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2018; 1–9. Available online at doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11414-018-9608-9. Accessed November 24, 2018.
- 28.Starr B, Yohalem N, Gannett E. Youth Work Core Competencies: A Review of Existing Frameworks and Purposes. Washington, DC: Next Generation Youth Work Coalition, 2009. 28. Available online https://www.niost.org/pdf/Core_Competencies_Review_October_2009.pdf. Accessed November 24, 2018.
- 31.Trotter YD. Adult learning theories: Impacting professional development programs. The Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin. 2006; 72(3): 8–13.Google Scholar
- 36.McMillen JC, Hawley KM, Proctor EK. Mental health clinicians’ participation in web-based training for an evidence supported intervention: Signs of encouragement and trouble ahead. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2016; 43: 592–603.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 39.Beidas RS, Kendall PC. Training therapists in evidence-based practice: A critical review of studies from a systems-contextual perspective. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2010; 17(1): 1–30.Google Scholar
- 42.Hoge MA, Huey LY, O’Connell MJ. Best practices in behavioral health workforce education and training. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2004; 32(2): 92–106.Google Scholar
- 44.Powers CB, Allaman E. How Participatory Action Research Can Promote Social Change and Help Youth Development. 2012. Berkman Center Research Publication No. 2013-10. Available online at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2199500. Accessed November 24, 2018.
- 47.Leahy MJ, Szymanski EM, Linkowski D. Knowledge importance in Rehabilitation Counseling. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 1993; 37(2): 130–145.Google Scholar
- 50.Grbich C. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Introduction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2013.Google Scholar
- 51.Marshall C, Rossman GB. Designing Qualitative Research (5th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2011.Google Scholar