Improving Patient Care through Collaborative Consultation Integration: a Quality Improvement Initiative

  • 164 Accesses


Evidence suggests that interdisciplinary care leads to improvements in patient care and efficiency. To determine whether integrating inpatient hospital behavioral health services would result in improved perceptions of patient care and efficiency, team members (N = 23) were surveyed 1 year after integration on measures of patient care, efficiency, and personal satisfaction. A majority of respondents believed integration improved patient care and efficiency. Overall satisfaction was high. The results suggest integration of behavioral health services improves individual perceptions of patient care, efficiency, and satisfaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant unlimited access to the full article PDF.

US$ 39.95

Price includes VAT for USA

Subscribe to journal

Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.

US$ 99

This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.


  1. 1.

    Arriaga AF, Gawande AA, Raemer DB, et al. Pilot testing of a model for insurer-driven, large-scale multicenter simulation training for operating room teams. Annals of Surgery. 2014;259(3):403–410.

  2. 2.

    Garbee DD, Paige J, Barrier K, et al. Interprofessional teamwork among students in simulated codes: a quasi-experimental study. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2013;34(5): 339–344.

  3. 3.

    Paige JT, Garbee DD, Kozmenko V, et al. Getting a head start: high-fidelity, simulation-based operating room team training of interprofessional students. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014;218(1):140–149.

  4. 4.

    Tsai MJ, Huang JY, Wei PJ, et al. Outcomes of the patients in the respiratory care center are not associated with the seniority of the caring resident. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013;29:43–49.

  5. 5.

    Slaby AE, Goldberg RJ, Wallace SR. Interdisciplinary team approach to emergency psychiatric care. Psychosomatics. 1983;24(7):627–637.

  6. 6.

    Bui M, Thom RP, Hurwitz S, et al. Hospital Length of Stay With a Proactive Psychiatric Consultation Model in the Medical Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Analysis. Psychosomatics. In Press.

  7. 7.

    Desan PH, Zimbrean PC, Weinstein AJ, et al. Proactive psychiatric consultation services reduce length of stay for admissions to an inpatient medical team. Psychosomatics. 2011;52:513–520.

  8. 8.

    Levitan SJ, Kornfeld DS. Clinical and cost benefits of liaison psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1981;138:790–793.

  9. 9.

    Strain JJ, Lyons JS, Hammer JS, et al. Cost offset from a psychiatric consultation-liaison intervention with elderly hip fracture patients. American Journal of Psychiatry.1991;148:1044–1049.

  10. 10.

    Koivunen M, Anttila M, Kuosmanen L, et al. Team climate and attitudes toward information and communication technology among nurses on acute psychiatric wards. Informatics for Health and Social Care. 2015;40(1):79–90.

  11. 11.

    Givens SE, Skully C, Bromley G. Psychiatric inpatient bedside handoff: implementation of a quality improvement project and nurses’ responses. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services. 2016;54(7):33–37.

  12. 12.

    Common Program Requirements. Accreditation Counsel of Graduate Medical Education. Available online at Accessed on March 13, 2019.

  13. 13.

    Arbuckle MR, Weinberg M, Cabaniss DL, et al. Training psychiatry residents in quality improvement: an integrated, year-long curriculum. Academic Psychiatry. 2013;37(1):42–45.

  14. 14.

    Kesari K, Ali S, Smith S. Integrating residents with institutional quality improvement teams. Medical Education. 2017;51(11):1173.

Download references


This article was supported by the Department of Psychiatry, University of Hawai‘i at Mānoa. The authors would like to express their appreciation to the staff of the Department of Psychiatry and the members of the interdisciplinary team who took part in this integration project.

Author information

Correspondence to James R. Agapoff MD, MS.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Considerations

This research is classified as Quality Improvement and therefore was given an exemption from IRB approval in accordance with the rules set forth by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material


(DOCX 195 kb)


(DOCX 79 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agapoff, J.R., Goebert, D., Takeshita, J. et al. Improving Patient Care through Collaborative Consultation Integration: a Quality Improvement Initiative. J Behav Health Serv Res 47, 139–145 (2020).

Download citation


  • Patient care
  • Multidisciplinary teams
  • Quality improvement
  • Consult liaison