Advertisement

Psychological Distress and Enrollment in Medicaid

  • Gilbert Gonzales
  • Ezra Golberstein
  • Steven C. Hill
  • Samuel H. ZuvekasEmail author
Article

Abstract

Adults with poor mental health may want and need insurance to obtain care, but symptoms may impede enrollment into public health insurance. This study compares Medicaid enrollment responses to eligibility expansions by mental health status using a sample of non-elderly adults in both the 2000–2011 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey and the National Health Interview Survey (N = 27,494). The impact of Medicaid income eligibility thresholds (defined as the maximum family income level allowed in each state to be considered eligible for Medicaid) on Medicaid enrollment was estimated from linear regression models allowing for differential enrollment responses by mental and physical health status. Increasing income eligibility thresholds by 100% of the federal poverty level (FPL) was associated with a five-percentage-point increase in the probability of Medicaid enrollment in the non-disabled population under 300% FPL. The enrollment response to Medicaid expansions prior to the Affordable Care Act was stronger for adults symptomatic of psychological distress compared with adults without distress and compared to adults with chronic physical health problems.

Keywords

Mental Health Problem Poor Mental Health National Health Interview Survey Medical Expenditure Panel Survey Physical Health Problem 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This paper represents the views of the authors, and no official endorsement by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality or the Department of Health and Human Services is intended or should be inferred.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, et al. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):617–627.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Garfield RL, Zuvekas SH, Lave JR, et al. The impact of national health care reform on adults with severe mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry. 2011;168(5):486–494.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hill SC, Abdus S, Hudson JL, et al. Adults in the income range for the Affordable Care Act’s Medicaid expansion are healthier than pre-ACA enrollees. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2014;33(4):691–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Garfield, RL. Mental Health Financing in the United States: A Primer. Kaiser Family Foundation, 2011.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zuvekas SH, Selden TM. 2010. Mental health and family out-of-pocket expenditure burdens. Medical Care Research & Review. 67(2):194–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    McMarrow, Kenney GM, Long SK, et al. Medicaid Expansions from 1997 to 2009 increased coverage and improved access and mental health outcomes for low-income parents. Health Services Research. 2016; [Epub ahead of print].Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hamersma S, Kim M. Participation and crowd out: assessing the effects of parental Medicaid expansions. Journal of Health Economics. 2013; 32(1): 160–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Atherly A, Dowd BE, Coulam RF, et al. The effect of HIFA waiver expansions on uninsurance rates in adult populations. Health Services Research. 2012;47(3):939–962.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Medicaid & CHIP: August 2014 Monthly Applications, Eligibility Determinations, and Enrollment Report. Available at: http://www.medicaid.gov/medicaid-chip-program-information/program-information/downloads/august-2014-enrollment-report.pdf. Accessed on December 4, 2014.
  10. 10.
    Busch SH, Vigdor ER. Are adults in poor health more likely to enroll in public insurance? Inquiry. 2008–2009;45(4):380–394.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Meyerhoefer CD, Pylypchuk Y. The effect of chronic illness on participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance and Medicaid programs. American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 2014;96(5):1383–1401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sommers BD, Kenney GM, Epstein AM. New evidence on the Affordable Care Act: coverage impacts of early Medicaid expansions. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2014;33(1):78–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sommers BD, Tomasi MR, Swartz K, et al. 2012. Reasons for the wide variation in Medicaid participation rates among states hold lessons for coverage expansion in 2014. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2012;31(5):909–919.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    McGuire TG, Newhouse JP, Normand SL, et al. Assessing incentives for service-level selection in private health insurance exchanges. Journal of Health Economics. 2014;32(6):1263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stuber J, Kronebusch K. Stigma and other determinants of participation in TANF and Medicaid. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management. 2004;23(3):509–530.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Caceda R, Nemeroff CB, Harvey PD. Toward an understanding of decision making in severe mental illness. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences. 2014;26(3):196–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mojtabi, R, Olfson M, Sampson NA, et al. Barriers to mental health treatment: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R). Psychological Medicine. 2011;41(8): 1751–1761.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Baicker K, Taubman SL, Allen HL, et al. The Oregon experiment—effects of Medicaid on clinical outcomes. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013; 368(18):1713–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kessler RC, Andrews G, Colpe LJ, et al. Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distress. Psychological Medicine. 2002;32(6):959–976.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Currie J, Gruber J. Saving babies: The efficacy and cost of recent changes in the Medicaid eligibility of pregnant women. Journal of Political Economy. 1996;104(6):1263–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pirraglia PA, Hampton JM, Rosen AB, et al. Psychological distress and trends in healthcare expenditures and outpatient healthcare. American Journal of Managed Care 2011;17(5):319–328.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ai C, Norton EC. Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters. 2003;80:123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S. How much should we trust difference-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 2004;119(1):249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wang PS, Lane M, Olfson M, et al. Twelve-month use of mental health services in the United States: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Archives of General Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):629–640.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Behavioral Health (outside the USA) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gilbert Gonzales
    • 1
  • Ezra Golberstein
    • 2
  • Steven C. Hill
    • 3
  • Samuel H. Zuvekas
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Health PolicyVanderbilt University School of MedicineNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Division of Health Policy & ManagementUniversity of Minnesota School of Public HealthMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Center for Financing, Access and Cost TrendsAgency for Healthcare Research and QualityRockvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations