Does Competitive Work Improve Quality of Life for Adults with Severe Mental Illness? Evidence from a Randomized Trial of Supported Employment

  • Paul B. Gold
  • Cathaleene Macias
  • Charles F. Rodican
Article

Abstract

A randomized trial comparing a facility-based Clubhouse (N = 83) to a mobile Program of Assertive Community Treatment (PACT; N = 84) tested the widely held belief that competitive employment improves global quality of life for adults with severe mental illness. Random regression analyses showed that, over 24 months of study participation, competitively employed Clubhouse participants reported greater global quality of life improvement, particularly with the social and financial aspects of their lives, as well as greater self-esteem and service satisfaction, compared to competitively employed PACT participants. However, there was no overall association between global quality of life and competitive work, or work duration. Future research will determine whether these findings generalize to other certified Clubhouses or to other types of supported employment. Multi-site studies are needed to identify key mechanisms for quality of life improvement in certified Clubhouses, including the possibly essential role of Clubhouse employer consortiums for providing high-wage, socially integrated jobs.

Notes

Acknowledgment

This research was funded by grants from the National Institute of Mental Health to the first and second authors (MH01903 and MH62628, respectively). The views expressed herein are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of any federal agency.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors do not report any conflicts of interest.

Disclosures

None for any author

References

  1. 1.
    Drake RE, Bond GR, Becker DR. Individual Placement and Support: An evidence-based approach to supported employment. New York: Oxford University Press; 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chiu MYL, Ho WWN, Lo WTL, et al. Operationalization of the SAMHSA model of recovery: a quality of life perspective. Quality of Life Research. 2010;19(1):1–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lloyd C, King R, Moore L. Subjective and objective indicators of recovery in severe mental illness: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Social Psychiatry. 2010;56(3):220–229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strauss JS, Harding CM, Silverman M, et al. Work as treatment for psychiatric disorder: A puzzle in pieces. In: Ciariello JA, Bell MD, Eds. Vocational rehabilitation of persons with prolonged psychiatric disorders. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 1998, 47–55.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bond GR, Resnick SG, Drake RE, et al. Does competitive employment improve nonvocational outcomes for people with severe mental illness? Journal Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2001;69(3):489–501.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burns T, Catty J, White S, et al. The impact of supported employment and working on clinical and social functioning: results of an international study of individual placement and support. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2009;35(5):949–958.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    McHugo GJ, Drake RE, Xie H, et al. A 10-year study of steady employment and non-vocational outcomes among people with serious mental illness and co-occurring substance use disorders. Schizophrenia Research. 2012;138(2–3):233–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Priebe S, Reininghaus U, McCabe R, et al. Factors influencing subjective quality of life in patients with schizophrenia and other mental disorders: a pooled analysis. Schizophrenia Research. 2010;121(1–3):251–258.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rüesch DP, Graf J, Meyer PC, et al. Occupation, social support and quality of life in persons with schizophrenic or affective disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 2004;39(9):686–694.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Twamley EW, Narvaez JM, Becker DR, et al. Supported employment for middle-aged and older people with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation. 2008;11(1):76–89.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fabian ES. Supported employment and the quality of life: Does a job make a difference? Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 1992;36(2):84–97.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kukla M, Bond GR. A randomized controlled trial of evidence-based supported employment: Nonvocational outcomes. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2013;38:91–98.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mueser KT, Clark RE, Haines M, et al. The Hartford study of supported employment for persons with severe mental illness. Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2004;72(3):479–490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burns T, Catty J. IPS in Europe: the EQOLISE trial. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2008;31(4):313–317.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bond GR, Peterson AE, Becker DR, et al. Validation of the revised Individual Placement and Support fidelity scale (IPS-25). Psychiatric Services. 2012;63(8):758–763.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Macias C, Gold PB, Hargreaves WA, et al. Preference in random assignment: implications for the interpretation of randomized trials. Administration and Policy in Mental Health. 2009;36(5):331–342.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Roberts MM, Murphy A, Dolce J, et al. A study of the impact of social support development on job acquisition and retention among people with psychiatric disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2010;33(3):203–207.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schutt RK, Hursh NC. Influences on job retention among homeless persons with substance abuse or psychiatric disabilities. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare. 2009;36(4):53–73.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gold PB. Family contact moderates association of competitive work with quality of life for adults with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services. 2013;64(12):1218–1224.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Propst R. Standards for clubhouse programs: Why and how they were developed. Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal. 1992;16(2):25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Frey JL. Long term support: the critical element in sustaining competitive employment: where do we begin? Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal. 1994;17(3):127–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Macias C, Rodican CF, Hargreaves WA, et al. Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57(10):1406–1415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cook JA, Blyler CR, Leff HS, et al. The employment intervention demonstration program: major findings and policy implications. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 2008;31(4):291–295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Macias C, Barreira P, Alden M, et al. The ICCD benchmarks for clubhouses: A practical approach to quality improvement in psychiatric rehabilitation. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52(2):207–213.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gold PB, Macias C, Barreira PJ, et al. Viability of using employment rates from randomized trials as benchmarks for supported employment program performance. Administration and Policy in Mental Health. 2010;37(5):427–432.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Allness DJ, Knoedler WH. The PACT model of community-based treatment for persons with severe and persistent mental illness: A manual for PACT start-up. Arlington, VA: National Alliance for the Mentally Ill; 1998Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Anderson S. We are not alone: Fountain House and the development of clubhouse culture. New York: Fountain House, Inc.; 1998.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lehman AF. Measures of quality of life among persons with severe and persistent mental disorders. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 1996;31(2):78–88.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lehman AF, Kernan E, Postrado L. Toolkit for evaluating quality of life for persons with severe mental illness. Baltimore, MD: The Evaluation Center at HSRI, 1995Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Rosenberg M. Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. New Jersey: Princeton University Press; 1965.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Sinclair SJ, Blais MA, Gansler DA, et al. Psychometric properties of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale: Overall and across demographic groups living within the United States. Evaluation & the Health Professions. 2010;33(1):56–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Larsen DL, Attkisson CC, Hargreaves WA, et al. Assessment of client/patient satisfaction: Development of a general scale. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1979;2:197–207.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nguyen TD, Attkisson CC, Stegner BL. Assessment of patient satisfaction: Development and refinement of a service evaluation questionnaire. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1983;6(3–4):299–314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Attkisson CC, Zwick R. The Client Satisfaction Questionnaire: Psychometric properties and correlations with service utilization and psychotherapy outcome. Evaluation and Program Planning. 1982;5(3):233–237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Chandler D, Spicer G, Wagner M, et al. Cost-effectiveness of a capitated assertive community treatment program. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal. 1999;22(4):327–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    United States Code of Federal Regulations. 34CFR361.5(b)(11) (i–ii). 2013.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    SAS Institute, Inc. SAS/STAT. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, Inc.; 2010. Available online at: www.sas.com.
  38. 38.
    Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA. The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin.1987;13(2):261–276.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kronick R, Gilmer T, Dreyfus T, et al. Improving health-based payment for Medicaid beneficiaries: CDPS. Health Care Financing Review. 2000;21(3):29–64.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bystritsky A, Saxena S, Maidment K, et al. Quality-of-life changes among patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder in a partial hospitalization program. Psychiatric Services. 1999;50(3):412–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wasserman DA, Sorensen JL, Delucchi KL, et al. Psychometric evaluation of the quality of life interview, brief version, in injection drug users. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors. 2006;20(3):316–321.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tempier R, Balbuena L, Garety P, et al. Does assertive community outreach improve social support? Results from the Lambeth Study of Early-Episode Psychosis. Psychiatric Services. 2012;63(3):216–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Macias C, Rodican C. Coping with recurrent loss in mental illness: Unique aspects of clubhouse communities. Journal of Personal and Interpersonal Loss. 1997;2(3):205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bond GR, Kukla M. Impact of follow-along support on job tenure in the individual placement and support model. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 2011;199(3):150–155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bond GR, Salyers MP, Dincin J, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing two vocational models for persons with severe mental illness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2007;75(6):968–982.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mechanic D, Bilder S, McAlpine DD. Employing persons with serious mental illness. Health Affairs (Millwood). 2002;21(5):242–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Clubhouse International. 2012 International Directory. Available online at: http://www.iccd.org/search_form.php. Accessed June 10, 2013.
  48. 48.
    Salkever D. Social costs of expanding access to evidence-based supported employment: Concepts and interpretive review of evidence. Psychiatric Services. 2013;64(2):111–119.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Waghorn G, Collister L, Killackey E, et al. Challenges to implementing evidence-based supported employment in Australia. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation. 2007;27(1):29–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Behavioral Health 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul B. Gold
    • 1
  • Cathaleene Macias
    • 2
    • 3
  • Charles F. Rodican
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Counseling, Higher Education, and Special EducationUniversity of Maryland at College ParkCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Community Intervention ResearchMcLean HospitalBelmontUSA
  3. 3.Harvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations