Low-Income Cancer Patients in Depression Treatment: Dropouts and Completers
- 424 Downloads
This study aims to explore reasons for depression treatment dropout among low-income, minority women with depression and cancer. Semi-structured telephone interviews are conducted with 20, predominately Latina, patients who dropped out of depression treatment and 10 who completed. Transcripts analyzed using techniques rooted in grounded theory. Treatment completion barriers cluster according to Meichenbaum and Turk's (Facilitating treatment adherence: A practitioner's guidebook, Plenum Press, New York, 1987) five adherence dimensions: (a) Barriers to Treatment (informational, instrumental, cultural [language, discrimination]); (b) Disease Features (emotional burden of cancer/depression); (c) Cancer/Depression Treatment Regimens; (d) Provider–Patient Relationship (depression treatment dissatisfaction); and (e) Clinical Setting (hospital organizational issues). Although both groups describe multiple overlapping dimensions of barriers, completers seem more motivated and satisfied with treatment, possibly due to completers experiencing the positive treatment effects after the first several sessions. More research should be conducted to determine the most effective clinical treatment methods for this population.
KeywordsAntidepressant Medication Depression Treatment Minority Cancer Patient Positive Treatment Effect Project Assistant
We thank Sylvia Barker, Maria Hu-Cordova, and Yvonne Parades-Alexander who helped with challenging recruitment and data collection efforts for this study; Tess Cruz, PhD, who assisted advice on the research design and data analysis; Pey-Jiuan Lee, who provided necessary data analysis reports; and Patricia Cheung, who contributed to updating the literature. I confirm all patient/personal identifiers have been removed or disguised so the patient/person(s) described are not identifiable and cannot be identified through the details of the story. This project was funded by grants from the American Cancer Society for a doctoral oncology fellowship (DSW06-219-01-SW), the National Cancer Institute for a Minority Research Supplement (3 R01 CA105269-S1) (PI: Kathleen Ell, DSW) and an NCI F31 dissertation fellowship (1 F31 CA132623).
Conflict of interest
The authors declared no conflicts of interest with respect to the authorship and/or publication of this article.
- 1.National Institutes of Health. Symptom management in cancer: Pain, depression and fatigue. State-of-the-science conference statement. Journal of Pain and Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy. 2003; 17: 77–97.Google Scholar
- 9.Kroenke K, Theobald D, Wu J, et al. Effect of telecare management on pain and depression in patients with cancer. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association. 2010; 302(2): 163–171.Google Scholar
- 15.Somerset W, Stout SC, Miller AH, et al. Breast cancer and depression. Oncology (Williston Park). 2004; 18: 1021.Google Scholar
- 16.Spiegel D. Psychosocial aspects of breast cancer treatment. Seminars in Oncology. 1997; 24(1): 36–47.Google Scholar
- 26.Institute of Medicine. Cancer care for the whole patient: Meeting psychosocial health needs. Washington D.C.: The National Academic Press, 2008.Google Scholar
- 27.National Institute of Mental Health. Depression and cancer: NIMH depression publications. National Institute of Mental Health US Department of Health and Human Services. 2002.Google Scholar
- 46.Muñoz RF, Ying, YT. The prevention of depression: Research and practice. Baltimore: MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
- 50.Kroenke, K. & Spitzer, R.L. (2002). The PHQ-9: A new depression and diagnostic severity measure. Psychiatric Annals. 32(9), 509–521.Google Scholar
- 55.Mason, M. Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum:qualitative social research. 2010; 11(3).Google Scholar
- 57.Strauss AL, Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.Google Scholar
- 58.Fishbein M. Readings in attitude theory and measurement. New York City: Wiley, 1967.Google Scholar
- 59.Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.Google Scholar
- 61.Denzin NK, editor. The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.Google Scholar
- 62.Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1985.Google Scholar
- 63.Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing, 1994.Google Scholar
- 65.Balogh EP, Ganz PA, Murphy SB, et al. Patient-centered cancer treatment planning: Improving the quality of oncology care. Summary of an Institute of Medicine Workshop. Oncologist. 2011; Meeting Report.Google Scholar