Advertisement

Could Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Have Iatrogenic Consequences? A Commentary

  • Stephanie L. SmithEmail author
Article

Abstract

Comprehensive Soldier Fitness (CSF) is a public health program intended to improve US Army service personnels’ resilience to military stressors including combat and operational experiences. The program uses psychological and behavioral strategies that have been shown to enhance resilience in children and adolescents. CSF has many modules that target a variety of dimensions of wellness. One of the core themes to CSF is the promotion of optimism and positive reframing of challenging situations. To date, the CSF program has not been critically and independently evaluated. This commentary argues that an emphasis on positive emotions and optimism could be maladaptive for post-combat recovery. Clinical and public behavioral health practitioners and researchers can play an important role in evaluating CSF psychological strategies.

Keywords

Positive Emotion Behavioral Health Service Member Posttraumatic Growth Operation Iraqi Freedom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Peterson C, Park N, Castro CA. Assessment for the U.S. army comprehensive soldier fitness program: The global assessment tool. The American Psychologist 2011; 66(1): 10–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reivich KJ, Seligman ME, McBride S. Master resilience training in the U.S. army. The American Psychologist 2011; 66(1): 25–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Penn Resiliency Program Curriculum. Available online at http://www.ppc.sas.upenn.edu/prpsum.htm. Accessed June 17th, 2012.
  4. 4.
    Cornum R, Matthews MD, Seligman ME. Comprehensive soldier fitness: Building resilience in a challenging institutional context. The American Psychologist 2011; 66(1): 4–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tedeschi RG, McNally RJ. Can we facilitate posttraumatic growth in combat veterans? The American Psychologist 2011; 66(1): 19–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mental Health Advisory Team (MHAT-IV 2009). Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) 07–09. Available online at http://www.armymedicine.army.mil/reports/mhat/mhat_vi/mhat-vi.cfm. Accessed June 17th, 2012.
  7. 7.
    Hoge CW, Auchterlonie JL, Milliken CS. Mental health problems, use of mental health services, and attrition from military service after returning from deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. Journal of the American Medical Association 2006; 295(9): 1023–1032.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Eisen SV, Schultz MR, Vogt D, et al. Mental and Physical Health Status and Alcohol and Drug Use Following Return From Deployment to Iraq or Afghanistan. American Journal of Public Health 2012; 102 (S1): S66-S73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reger MA, Gahm GA, Swanson RD, et al. Association between number of deployments to Iraq and mental health screening outcomes in US army soldiers. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 2009; 70(9): 1266–1272.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jakupcak M, Cook J, Imel Z, et al. Posttraumatic stress disorder as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2009; 22(4): 303–306.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kang HK, Bullman TA. Risk of suicide among US veterans after returning from the Iraq or Afghanistan war zones. Journal of the American Medical Association 2008; 300(6): 652–653.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Brunwasser SM, Gillham JE, Kim ES. A meta-analytic review of the Penn Resiliency Program’s effect on depressive symptoms. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2009; 77(6): 1042–1054.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Comprehensive Soldier Fitness, Official US Army homepage. Available online at http://www.army.mil/article/24837/comprehensive-soldier-fitness. Accessed June 17th, 2012.
  14. 14.
    Department of Defense Bloggers Roundtable with Brigadier General Rhonda Cornum, Director, Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Program, US Army. Available online at www.defense.gov/Blog_files/…/20091118_cornum_transcript.pdf. Accessed June 17th, 2012.
  15. 15.
    Eidelson R, Pilisuk M, Soldz S. The dark side of comprehensive soldier fitness. The American Psychologist 2011; 66(7): 643–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Algoe SB, Fredrickson BL. Emotional fitness and the movement of affective science from lab to field. The American Psychologist 2011; 66(1): 35–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wortman CB, Boerner K. Beyond the Myths of Coping with Loss: Prevailing Assumptions Versus Scientific Evidence. In: HS Friedman. The Oxford Handbook of Health Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc, 2011, pp. 438–476.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Norem JK, Illingworth KSS. Mood and performance among defensive pessimists and strategic optimists. Journal of Research in Personality 2004; 38(4): 351–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lazarus RS. The Trivialization of Distress, Practical Applications of Stress and Coping. In: RS Lazarus. Fifty Years of the Research and Theory of RS Lazarus: an analysis of historical and perennial issues. New Jersey: Lawrence Ehrblum Associates, Inc, 1998, pp. 251–270.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    De Raeve L. Positive thinking and moral oppression in cancer care. European Journal of Cancer Care 2007; 6(4): 249–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bourke J. An Intimate History of Killing. London: Granta, 1999, pp 238.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wolfendale J. Performance-enhancing technologies and moral responsibility in the military. The American Journal of Bioethics 2008; 8(2): 28–38.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Henning KR, Frueh BC. Combat guilt and its relationship to PTSD symptoms. Journal of Clinical Psychology 1997; 53(8): 801–808.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Budden A. The role of shame in posttraumatic stress disorder: A proposal for a socio-emotional model for DSM-V. Social Science & Medicine 2009; 69(7): 1032–1039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Witvliet CV, Phipps KA, Feldman ME, et al. Posttraumatic mental and physical health correlates of forgiveness and religious coping in military veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress 2004; 17(3): 269–273.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Litz BT, Stein N, Delaney E, et al. Moral injury and moral repair in war veterans: A preliminary model and intervention strategy. Clinical Psychology Review 2009; 29(8): 695–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Faller H, Schilling S, Lang H. Causal attribution and adaptation among lung cancer patients. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 1995; 39(5): 619–627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Glinder JG, Compas BE. Self-blame attributions in women with newly diagnosed breast cancer: A prospective study of psychological adjustment. Health Psychology: Official Journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association 1999;18(5): 475–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Litz BT, Gray MJ, Bryant RA, et al. Early intervention for trauma: Current status and future directions. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice 2002; 9(2):112–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Quick JC. Missing: Critical and Skeptical Perspectives on Comprehensive Soldier Fitness. The American Psychologist 2011, 66(7):645.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lester PB, McBride S, Bliese PD, et al. (2011). Bringing Science to Bear. An Empirical Assessment of the Comprehensive Soldier Fitness Program. The American Psychologist 2011, 66(1), 77–81.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Foran HM, Adler AB, McGurk D, et al. Soldiers’ Perceptions of Resilience Training and Postdeployment Adjustment: Validation of a Measure of Resilience Training Content and Training Process. Psychological Services 2012, Apr. 30.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nash WP. U.S. Marine Corps and Navy combat and operational stress continuum model: A tool for leaders. In: EC Ritchie. Combat and Operational Behavioral Health. Washington, DC: Borden Institute, 2011, pp. 107–119.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Fellow in Global Mental Health Delivery, Department of Global Health and Social MedicineHarvard Medical SchoolBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations