This paper reports on the frequency and distribution of seclusion or restraint (SR) episodes among 1,266 adult inpatients at a state psychiatric hospital during the 2004 calendar year. Data on the concentration of SR episodes over patients and time can assist in planning alternative, recovery-oriented treatment models. Fifteen percent (N = 194) of patients experienced seclusion or restraint. Sixty-three percent of all seclusion hours were concentrated among only ten patients. Likewise, the ten patients with the most restraint hours constituted nearly 65% of total restraint hours for the year and 48% of all restraint episodes. Variables accessible through administrative data accounted for modest seclusion and restraint variance. A comprehensive strategy to prevent SR episodes requires tailored interventions targeted to known high-risk individuals and development of general hospital-wide alternatives to SR. General alternatives require greater attention to staff education, administrative oversight, de-escalation and debriefing practices, patient involvement, and other recovery-oriented practices to reduce or eliminate use of seclusion and restraint.
Seclusion Restraint Psychiatric Inpatients
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Weiss E. Deadly restraint: a nationwide pattern of death. Hartford Courant, October 11, 1998.Google Scholar
Busch AB, Shore MF. Seclusion and restraint: a review of recent literature. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 2000;8:261–270.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Fisher WA. Restraint and seclusion: a review of the literature. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1994;151:1584–1591.PubMedGoogle Scholar
National Technical Assistance Center (NTAC). Violence and coercion in mental health settings: Eliminating the use of seclusion and restraint. Networks. Summer/Fall 2002:1–19.Google Scholar
Frueh BC, Knapp RG, Cusack KJ, et al. Patients’ reports of traumatic or harmful experiences within the psychiatric setting. Psychiatric Services. 2005;56:1123–1133.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Robins CS, Sauvageot JA, Cusack KJ, et al. Consumers’ perceptions of negative experiences and “sanctuary harm” in psychiatric settings. Psychiatric Services. 2005;56:1134–1138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw WB, Cain KA, Francis PS. An updated national survey on seclusion and restraint. Psychiatric Services. 1997;48:395–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Way B. The use of restraint and seclusion in New York State psychiatric centers. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 1986;8:383–393.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Donat DC. An analysis of successful efforts to reduce the use of seclusion and restraint at a public psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Services. 2003;54:1119–1123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
LeBel J, Stromberg N, Duckworth K, et al. Child and adolescent inpatient restraint reduction: a state initiative to promote strength-based care. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2004;43:37–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Smith GM, Davis RH, Bixler EO, et al. Pennsylvania State Hospital system’s seclusion and restraint reduction program. Psychiatric Services. 2005;56:1115–1122.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Myers M. Principles of positive behavioral support. Paper presented at the Washington State Behavioral Health Conference, June, 2005.Google Scholar
Donat DC. Encouraging alternatives to seclusion, restraint, and reliance on PRN drugs in a public psychiatric hospital. Psychiatric Services. 2005;56:1105–1108.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar