School Personnel Perspectives on their School’s Implementation of a School-Based Suicide Prevention Program

  • Bradley D. Stein
  • Sheryl H. Kataoka
  • Alison B. Hamilton
  • Dana Schultz
  • Gery Ryan
  • Pamela Vona
  • Marleen Wong
Article

Abstract

Youth suicide is a national public health priority, with policymakers highlighting schools as an ideal setting in which to deliver suicide prevention programs. Over the past decade, the number of schools implementing such programs has grown substantially, yet little is known about how successfully such programs are being implemented. This study examines the implementation of a district-wide suicide prevention program through key informant interviews with school personnel. Schools with higher rates of implementing district protocols for at-risk students had an organized system to respond to at-risk students, a process for effectively responding to students who were at-risk for suicide, and strong administrative support. In contrast, schools that had lower rates of implementing district protocols relied on a handful of individuals for suicide prevention activities and had limited administrative support. Attention to organizational factors leading to successful implementation of school-based suicide prevention programs may enhance the role of schools in national adolescent suicide prevention efforts.

References

  1. 1.
    Grunbaum JA, Kann L, Kinchen S, et al. Youth risk behavior surveillance—United States, 2003. Morbidity & Mortality Weekly Report Surveillance Summaries. 2004;53:1–96.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Goldsmith S, Pellmar T, Kleinman A, et al. Reducing Suicide: A National Imperative. Washington DC: National Academy of Sciences; 2002.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garland AF, Zigler E. Adolescent suicide prevention. Current research and social policy implications. American Psychologist. 1993;48:169–182. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.48.2.169.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mazza JJ. School-based suicide prevention programs: Are they effective? School Psychology Review. 1997;26:382–396.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Brener ND, Martindale J, Weist MD. Mental health and social services: Results from the school health policies and programs study 2000. Journal of School Health. 2001;71:305–312.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Small ML, Majer LS, Allensworth DD, et al. School health services. Journal of School Health. 1995;65:319–326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalafat J, Elias M. An evaluation of a school-based suicide awareness intervention. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior. 1994;24:224–233.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Shaffer D, Garland A, Vieland V, et al. The impact of curriculum-based suicide prevention programs for teenagers. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1991;30:588–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spirito A, Overholser J, Ashworth S, et al. Evaluation of a suicide awareness curriculum for high school students. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1988;27:705. doi:10.1097/00004583-198811000-00007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hazell P, King R. Arguments for and against teaching suicide prevention in schools. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry. 1996;30:633–642. doi:10.3109/00048679609062659.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shaffer D, Vieland V, Garland A, et al. Adolescent suicide attempters. Response to suicide-prevention programs. Journal of the American Medical Association. 1990;264:3151–3155. doi:10.1001/jama.264.24.3151.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Vieland V, Whittle B, Garland ANN, et al. The impact of curriculum-based suicide prevention programs for teenagers: An 18-Month follow-up. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1991;30:811. doi:10.1097/00004583-199109000-00018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Overholser JC, Hemstreet AH, Anthony Spirito PD, et al. Suicide awareness programs in the schools: Effects of gender and personal experience. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1989;28:925. doi:10.1097/00004583-198911000-00018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garland A, Shaffer D, Whittle B. A national survey of school-based, adolescent suicide prevention programs. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1989;28:931–934. doi:10.1097/00004583-198911000-00019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aseltine Jr. RH, DeMartino R. An outcome evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program. American Journal of Public Health. 2004;94:446–451. doi:10.2105/AJPH.94.3.446.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ciffone J. Suicide Prevention: An analysis and replication of a curriculum-based high school program. Social Work. 2007;52:41–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Columbia University TeenScreen Program. How the Program Works. 2003–2005. Available at http://www.teenscreen.org/cms/content/view/4/32/. Accessed December 05, 2006
  18. 18.
    Shaffer D, Scott M, Wilcox H, et al. The Columbia Suicide Screen: Validity and reliability of a screen for youth suicide and depression. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 2004;43:71–79. doi:10.1097/00004583-200401000-00016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Reynolds WM. A school-based procedure for the identification of adolescents at risk for suicidal behaviors. Family & Community Health. 1991;14:64–75.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shaffer D, Craft L. Methods of adolescent suicide prevention. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry. 1999;60:70–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thompson EA, Eggert LL. Using the Suicide Risk Screen to identify suicidal adolescents among potential high school dropouts. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1999;38:1506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Eckert TL, Miller DN, Dupaul GJ, et al. Adolescent suicide prevention: School psychologists’ acceptability of school-based programs. School Psychology Review. 2003;32:57–77.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Scherff AR, Eckert TL, Miller DN. Youth suicide prevention: A survey of public school superintendents’ acceptability of school-based programs. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 2005;35:154–169. doi:10.1521/suli.35.2.154.62874.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Miller DN, Eckert TL, DuPaul GJ, et al. Adolescent suicide prevention: Acceptability of school-based programs among secondary school principals. Suicide & Life-Threatening Behavior. 1999;29:72–85.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Programs for the prevention of suicide among adolescents and young adults. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly. 1994;43:1–7.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    US Public Health Service. The Surgeon General’s call to action to prevent suicide, Washington, DC; 1999.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    King KA, Smith J. Project SOAR: A training program to increase school counselors’ knowledge and confidence regarding suicide prevention and intervention. Journal of School Health. 2000;70:402–407.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shaffer D, Garland A, Gould M, et al. Preventing teenage suicide: A critical review. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry. 1988;27:675–687. doi:10.1097/00004583-198811000-00001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kataoka SH, Stein BD, Lieberman R, et al. Suicide prevention in schools: Are we reaching minority youths? Psychiatric Services. 2003;54:1444. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.54.11.1444.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kataoka S, Stein BD, Nadeem E, et al. Who gets care? Mental health service use following a school-based suicide prevention program. Journal of the American Academy of Adolescent Psychiatry. 2007;46:1341–1348. doi:10.1097/chi.0b013e31813761fd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Schoenwald SK, Hoagwood K. Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of interventions: What matters when. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52:1190–1197. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.9.1190.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. New York, NY: Free Press; 1995.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hallfors D, Brodish PH, Khatapoush S, et al. Feasibility of screening adolescents for suicide risk in “real-world” high school settings. American Journal of Public Health. 2006;96:282–287. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.057281.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Greenhalgh T, Robert G, Macfarlane F, et al. Diffusion of innovations in service organizations: Systematic review and recommendations. Milbank Quarterly. 2004;82:581–629. doi:10.1111/j.0887-378X.2004.00325.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Atlas.ti.4.1. Federal Republic of Germany. Scientific Software Development; 1998.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Anderson B, Odden A, Farrar E, et al. State strategies to support local school improvement. Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization. 1987;9:42–86.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Basch CE, Sliepcevich EM. Innovators, innovations and implementation: A framework for curricular research in school health education. Health Education. 1983;14:20–24.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Berman P, Pauly EW. Federal programs supporting educational change, Vol. 2: Factors affecting change agent projects. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 1975.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gold RS, Parcel GS, Walberg HJ, et al. Summary and conclusions of the THTM evaluation: The expert work group perspective. Journal of School Health. 1991;61:39–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Green PL. Improving clinical effectiveness in an integrated care delivery system. Journal for Healthcare Quality. 1998;20:4–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gustafson DH, Sainfort F, Eichler M, et al. Developing and testing a model to predict outcomes of organizational change. Health Services Research. 2003;38:751–776. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.00143.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Montesino MU. Strategic alignment of training, transfer-enhancing behaviors, and training usage: A posttraining study. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2002;13:89–108. doi:10.1002/hrdq.1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Moser LL, Deluca NL, Bond GR, et al. Implementing evidence-based psychosocial practices: Lessons learned from statewide implementation of two practices. CNS Spectrum. 2004;9:926–936, 942.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Smith DW, McCormick LK, Steckler AB, et al. Teachers’ use of health curricula: Implementation of growing healthy, project SMART, and the teenage health teaching modules. Journal of School Health. 1993;63:349–354.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Rohrbach LA, D’Onofrio CN, Backer TE, et al. Diffusion of school-based substance abuse prevention programs. American Behavioral Scientist. 1996;39:919–934. doi:10.1177/0002764296039007012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gotham HJ. Diffusion of mental health and substance abuse treatments: Development, dissemination, and implementation. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice. 2004;11:160–176. doi:10.1093/clipsy/bph067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schoenwald SK, Henggeler SW, Brondino MJ, et al. Multisystemic therapy: Monitoring treatment fidelity. Family Process. 2000;39:83–103. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2000.39109.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RAND 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bradley D. Stein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Sheryl H. Kataoka
    • 3
  • Alison B. Hamilton
    • 4
  • Dana Schultz
    • 6
  • Gery Ryan
    • 5
  • Pamela Vona
    • 6
  • Marleen Wong
    • 7
  1. 1.Health Services ResearcherRAND CorporationPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.University of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Division of Child and Adolescent PsychiatryUCLA Semel InstituteLos AngelesUSA
  4. 4.UCLALos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.RAND CorporationSanta MonicaUSA
  6. 6.UCLA Semel InstituteDepartment of PsychiatryLos AngelesUSA
  7. 7.School of Social WorkUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations