System-Wide Implementation of ACT in Ontario: An Ongoing Improvement Effort

  • Lindsey George
  • Janet Durbin
  • Christopher J. Koegl
Regular Article

Abstract

In the late 1990s, the government of Ontario undertook a province-wide implementation of Assertive Community Treatment (ACT). Capacity grew to 59 teams within 6 years. This paper describes the implementation process, focusing on three phases—start-up, or the enabling phase; feedback, or the reinforcement phase; and response, or the corrective action phase. Key implementation supports include an active oversight committee with representation from both the ministry and the field and the availability of the planning data on ACT performance. Three areas of underperformance were identified: lower than expected team caseloads, drift from the target client group, and significant under-staffing in the teams. Likely causes were suggested, and corrective actions developed, which centered on clarifying the ACT standards, especially related to intake criteria, rate of intake and staffing, increasing team funding, and establishing expectations for reporting and accountability. While these corrective responses are promising, implementation of infrastructure and mechanisms for providing systematic practice feedback is still underdeveloped.

Keywords

assertive community treatment system dissemination quality improvement 

References

  1. 1.
    Bond GR, Drake RE, Mueser KT, Latimer E. Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental illness. Disease Management and Health Outcomes. 2001;9(3):141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Phillips S, Burns B, Edgar E, et al. Moving assertive community treatment into standard practice. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52(6):771–779.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stein LI, Test MA. Alternative to mental hospital treatment: I. Conceptual model, treatment program, and clinical evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry. 1980;37:392–397.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Teague GB, Bond GR, Drake RE. Program fidelity in assertive community treatment: Development and use of a measure. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry. 1998;68(2):216–232.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mueser KT, Bond GR, Drake RE, Resnick SG. Models of community care for severe mental illness: A review of research on case management. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1998;24(1):37–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Marshall M, Lockwood A. Assertive community treatment for people with severe mental disorders. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2003;3.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ziguras SJ, Stuart GW. A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of mental health case management over 20 years. Psychiatric Services. 2000;51(11):1410–1421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Latimer EA. Economic Impacts of assertive community treatment: A review of the literature. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry. 1999;44:443–454.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Torrey WC, Drake RE, Dixon L, et al. Implementing evidence-based practices for persons with severe mental illnesses. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52(1):45–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Flynn LM. Commentary. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 1998;24:30–32.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    News & Notes. President Clinton announces an array of initiative at First White House Conference of Mental Health. Psychiatric Services. 1999;50:980–981.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Centre for Mental Health Services. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 1999.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirby JL, Keon WJ. Out of the shadows at last: Transforming mental health, mental illness and addiction services in Canada. Ontario, Canada: Committee Business, Senate, Recent Reports, 38th Parliament, 1st Session, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wright C, Burns T, James P, et al. Assertive outreach teams in London: Models of operation. British Journal of Psyc hiatry. 2003;183:132–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McGrew JH, Bond GR, Dietzen LL, et al. Measuring the fidelity of implementation of a mental health program model. Journal of Consult Clinical Psychology. 1994;62:670–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    McHugo GJ, Drake RE, Teague GB, et al. The relationship between model fidelity and client outcomes in the New Hampshire Dual Disorders Study. Psychiatric Services. 1999;50:818–824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ganju V. Mental Health Quality and Accountability: The Role of Evidence-Based Practices and Performance Measurement. Administration Policy in Mental Health & Mental Health Service Research. 2006;33(6):659–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moser L, DeLuca N, Bond G, Rollins A. Implementing Evidence-Base Psychosocial Practices: Lessons Learned from Statewide Implementation of Two Practices. CNS Spectrums. 2004;9(12):926–936.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Isett K, Burnam M, Coleman-Beattie B, et al. The State Policy Context of Implementation Issues for Evidence-Based Practices in Mental Health. Psychiatric Services. 2007;58(7):914–921.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rapp C, Bond G, Becker D, et al. The Role of State Mental Health Authorities in Promoting Improved Client Outcomes through Evidence-Based Practice. Community Mental Health Journal. 2005;41(3):347–363.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Munetz M, Morrison A, Krake J, Young B. Statewide Implementation of the Crisis Intervention Team Program: The Ohio Model. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57(11):1569–1571.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Magnabosco J. Innovations in mental health services implementation: a report on state-level data from the U.S. Evidence-Based Practices Project. Implementation Science. 2006;1(13):1–11.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Program Standards for Assertive Community Treatment. Toronto, Ontario, 1998.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hartford K, Schrecker T, Wiktorowicz M, et al. Four decades of mental health policy in Ontario, Canada. Administrative Policy in Mental Health. 2003;31:65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Making It Happen. Toronto, Ontario: Queen's Printer for Ontario; 1999.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Stovall , J. Is assertive community treatment ethical care? Harvard Rev Psychiatry. 2001;9:139–143.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care. Ontario Program Standards for ACT Teams, Second Edition. Toronto, Ontario, 2004.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Koegl C, Durbin J, Goering P. Mental health services in Ontario: How well is the province meeting the needs of persons with serious mental illness. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; 2004.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lunsky Y, Bradley E, Durbin J, et al. The Clinical Profile and Service Needs of Adults with a Dual Diagnosis in Psychiatric Hospitals. Psychiatric Services. 2006;57(1):77–83.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Durbin J, Goering P, Cochrane J, et al. Needs-based planning for persons with schizophrenia residing in board-and-care homes. Schizophrenia Bulletin. 2004;30(1):123–132.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ellison ML, Rogers ES, Sciarappa K, et al. Characteristics of mental health case management: Results of a national survey. The Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1995;22(2):101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jerrell JM, Hargreaves WA. Community Program Philosophy Scale (Expanded). San Francisco: University of California; 1996.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Durbin J, Goering P, Streiner D, Pink G. Program structure and continuity of mental health care. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2004;36(2):12–37.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Durbin J, Cochrane J, Goering P, Macfarlane D. Needs based planning: Evaluation of a level of care planning model. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 2001;28(1):67–80.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ellis RH, Wackwitz JH, Foster M. Uses of an empirically derived client typology based on level of functioning: twelve years of the CCAR. Journal of Mental Health Administration. 1991;18(2):88–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Schwartz RC. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment rating scale. Psychological Reports. 1999;84:389–391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Bursten J, Cooper C, Davidson B, et al. 2002/03 Ontario ACT Data Outcome Monitoring Report. Ontario Ministry of Health and Long Term Care, Toronto, Ontario, 2004.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Meyer PS, Morrissey JP. A Comparison of Assertive Community Treatment and Intensive Care Management for Patients in Rural Areas. Psychiatric Services. 2007;58(1):121–127.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lindsey George
    • 2
  • Janet Durbin
    • 1
    • 4
    • 5
  • Christopher J. Koegl
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, Director of Adult Mental Health Research, System Linked Research Unit Head of ServiceMental Health Rehabilitation Services, Clinical Director, Brant Assertive Community Treatment TeamBrantfordCanada
  3. 3.Institute of CriminologyCambridge UniversityCambridgeUnited Kingdom
  4. 4.Health Systems Research and Consulting UnitCentre for Addiction and Mental HealthTorontoCanada
  5. 5.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations