Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices for Treatment of Alcohol and Drug Disorders: The Role of the State Authority

  • Traci R. RieckmannEmail author
  • Anne E. Kovas
  • Holly E. Fussell
  • Nicole M. Stettler
Regular Article


The current climate of increasing performance expectations and diminishing resources, along with innovations in evidence-based practices (EBPs), creates new dilemmas for substance abuse treatment providers, policymakers, funders, and the service delivery system. This paper describes findings from baseline interviews with representatives from 49 state substance abuse authorities (SSAs). Interviews assessed efforts aimed at facilitating EBP adoption in each state and the District of Columbia. Results suggested that SSAs are concentrating more effort on EBP implementation strategies such as education, training, and infrastructure development, and less effort on financial mechanisms, regulations, and accreditation. The majority of SSAs use EBPs as a criterion in their contracts with providers, and just over half reported that EBP use is tied to state funding. To date, Oregon remains the only state with legislation that mandates treatment expenditures for EBPs; North Carolina follows suit with legislation that requires EBP promotion within current resources.


evidence-based practices substance abuse treatment implementation state policy 


  1. 1.
    Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    New Freedom Commission on Mental Health. Achieving the Promise: Transforming Mental Health Care in America. Final Report. DHHS Pub. No. SMA-03-3832. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2003.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Report to Congress on the Prevention and Treatment of Co-occurring Substance Abuse Disorders and Mental Disorders. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration Office of Applied Studies; 2002.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Mental Health: A Report of the Surgeon General. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health; 1999.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National outcome measures. Available at Accessed September 15, 2007.
  6. 6.
    Institute of Medicine. Improving the Quality of Health Care for Mental and Substance-Use Conditions. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernal G, Scharrón-del-Río MR. Are empirically supported treatments valid for ethnic minorities? Toward an alternative approach for treatment research. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology. 2001;7:328–342.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Goldenberg MJ. On evidence and evidence-based medicine: Lessons from the philosophy of science. Social Science and Medicine. 2006;62:2621–2632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McHugo GH, Drake RE. Finding and evaluating the evidence: A critical step in evidence-based medicine. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 2003;26:821–831.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sackett D, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. 2nd edn. London: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Compton WM, Stein JB, Robertson EB, et al. Charting a course for health services research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;29:167–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    National Quality Forum. Evidence-Based Treatment Practices for Substance Use Disorders. Washington, DC: National Quality Forum; 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Miller WR, Zweben J, Johnson WR. Evidence-based treatment: Why, what, where, when, and how? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2005;29:267–276.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCarty D, Edmundson E. In: Levin BL, Petrila J, Hennessy KD, eds. The treatment system for alcohol and drug dependence. 2nd edn. Mental Health Services: A Public Health Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press; 2004:275–289.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rapp CA, Bond GR, Becker DR, et al. The role of state mental health authorities in promoting improved client outcomes through evidence-based practice. Community Mental Health Journal. 2005;41:347–362.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edition. New York: Free Press; 2003.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ridgely MS, Osher FC, Goldman HH, et al. Chronic mentally ill young adults with substance abuse problems: A review of research, treatment, and training issues. Baltimore, MD: University of Maryland School of Medicine, Mental Health Services Research Center; 1987.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gold PB, Glynn SM, Mueser KT. Challenges to implementing and sustaining comprehensive mental health service programs. Evaluation and the Health Professions. 2006;29:195–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lynde D. State Mental Health Authority (SMHA): Lessons we are learning implementing evidence-based practices. Presented at the NRI Conference on State Mental Health Agency Services, Research, Program Evaluation, and Policy, February 6–8, 2005, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors Research Institute. Co-occurring mental health and substance use disorders. Outlook 2005; Winter:3–4.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Magnabosco JL. Innovations in mental health services implementation: A report on state-level data from the U.S. Evidence-Based Practices Project. Implementation Science. 2006;1:13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pincus HA, Burnam MA, Magnabosco JL, et al. State Activities to Improve Services and Systems of Care for Individuals with Co-occurring Mental and Addictive Disorders. Santa Monica, CA: RAND; 2005.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Gabel JR, Whitmore H, Pickreign JD, et al. Substance abuse benefits: Still limited after all these years. Health Affairs. 2007;26:w474–w482.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McLellan T, Lewis D, O’Brien C. Drug dependence, a chronic medical illness. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;284:1689–1695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O'Brien CP, et al. Drug dependence: a chronic medical illness: implications for treatment, insurance, and outcomes evaluation. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2000;284:1689–1695.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mueser KT, Noordsy DL, Drake RE, et al. Integrated Treatment for Dual Disorders: A Guide to Effective Practice. New York: Guilford; 2003.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Drake RE, Essock SM, Shaner A, et al. Implementing dual diagnosis services for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52:469–476.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Co-occurring Disorders: Integrated Dual Disorders Toolkit, A Project of the Center for Mental Health Services (CMHS), SAMHSA, DHHS, and The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2003.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Center for Mental Health Services. Building Bridges: Co-occurring Mental Illness and Addiction: Consumers and Service Providers, Policymakers, and Researchers in Dialogue. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) 04-3892. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2004.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Burnam MA, Watkins KE. Substance abuse with mental disorders: Specialized public systems and integrated care. Health Affairs. 2006;25:648–658.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Koch JR, Cohen R, Kramer TL, et al. Blending research and practice in the treatment of adolescents with co-occurring psychiatric and substance use disorders. Presented at the NRI Conference on State Mental Health Agency Services, Research, Program Evaluation, and Policy, February 6–8, 2005, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. MacArthur Foundation initiative on mental health policy and research. Available at Accessed September 5, 2007.
  33. 33.
    Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. National Registry of Evidence-Based Programs and Practices. Available at Accessed March 14, 2007.
  34. 34.
    Torrey WC, Drake RE, Dixon L, et al. Implementing evidence-based practices in routine mental health service settings. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52:45–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Crump CE, Earp JA, Kozma CM, et al. Effect of organization-level variables on differential employee participation in 10 federal worksite health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly. 1996;23:204–223.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Fixsen DL, Naoom SF, Blase KA, et al. Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network; 2005.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Thomas CP, Wallack SS, Lee S, et al. Research to practice: Adoption of naltrexone in alcoholism treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2003;24:1–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    National Institute on Drug Abuse. Report of the Blue Ribbon Task Force on Health Services Research at the National Institute on Drug Abuse. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse; 2004.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johnson JA, Roman PM. Predicting closure of private substance abuse treatment facilities. Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research. 2002;29:115–125.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ambert AM, Adler PA, Adler P, et al. Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1995;57:879–893.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Briody E, Baba ML. Explaining differences in repatriation experiences: The discovery of coupled and decoupled systems. American Anthropologist. 1991;93:322–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bernard HR. Research methods. In: Bernard HR, ed. Anthropology: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994.Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Agar M. Stories, background, knowledge and themes. American Ethnology. 1980;7:223–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Good B, Good M. Toward a meaning-centered analysis of popular illness categories. In: Marsella A, White G, eds. Cultural Conceptions of Mental Health and Therapy. Dordrecht: Riedel; 1982.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Luborsky MR. Hip Fracture: Cultural Loss and Long-Term Reintegration. NIH/NIA 1 R01 AG023572-01 A2 2005.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Luborsky MR. The identification and analysis of themes and patterns. In: Gubrium J, Sankar A, eds. Qualitative Methods in Aging Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994:189–210.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Finnerty M, Rapp C, Bond G. State Health Authority Yardstick (SHAY): Impact of state level action on the quality and penetration of EBPs in the community. Presented at the NRI Conference on State Mental Health Agency Services Research, Program Evaluation, and Policy, February 6–8, 2005, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Baer JS, Ball SA, Campbell BK, et al. Training and fidelity monitoring of behavioral interventions in multi-site addictions research. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2007;87:107–118.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Sánchez V, Steckler A, Nitirat P, et al. Fidelity of implementation in a treatment effectiveness trial of Reconnecting Youth. Health Education Research. 2007;22:95–107.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Goldman HH, Ganju V, Drake RE. Policy implications for implementing evidence-based practices. Psychiatric Services. 2001;52:1591–1597.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Isett KR, Burnam MA, Coleman-Beattie B, et al. The role of state mental health authorities in managing change for the implementation of evidence-based practices. Community Mental Health Journal 2008; (in press). DOI  10.1007/s10597-007-9107-6.
  52. 52.
    Isett KR, Burnam MA, Coleman-Beattie B, et al. The state policy context of implementation issues for evidence-based practices in mental health. Psychiatric Services. 2007;58:914–927.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© National Council for Community Behavioral Healthcare 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Traci R. Rieckmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anne E. Kovas
    • 2
  • Holly E. Fussell
    • 1
  • Nicole M. Stettler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Public Health and Preventive MedicineOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryOregon Health and Science UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations