Modeling Attitude towards Drug Treament: The Role of Internal Motivation, External Pressure, and Dramatic Relief
- 211 Downloads
Motivation for change has historically been viewed as the crucial element affecting responsiveness to drug treatment. Various external pressures, such as legal coercion, may engender motivation in an individual previously resistant to change. Dramatic relief may be the change process that is most salient as individuals internalize such external pressures. Results of structural equation modeling on data from 465 drug users (58.9% male; 21.3% Black, 34.2% Hispanic/Latino, and 35.1% White) entering drug treatment indicated that internal motivation and external pressure significantly and positively predicted dramatic relief and that dramatic relief significantly predicted attitudes towards drug treatment: χ 2 = 142.20, df = 100, p < 0.01; Robust Comparative Fit Index = 0.97, Root Mean Squared Error of Approximation = 0.03. These results indicate that when external pressure and internal motivation are high, dramatic relief is also likely to be high. When dramatic relief is high, attitudes towards drug treatment are likely to be positive. The findings indicate that interventions to get individuals into drug treatment should include processes that promote Dramatic Relief. Implications for addictions health services are discussed.
Keywordsdrug treatment process structural equation modeling heroin cocaine methamphetamine
Support for this research was provided by Grants R03-DA23131, R01-DA12476, and K05-DA00146. Dr. Anglin is also supported by NIDA Senior Research Scientist Award K05 DA00146.
- 4.Simpson DD, Joe GW. Motivation as a predictor of early dropout from drug abuse treatment. Psychotherapy. 1993;30:357–368.Google Scholar
- 6.Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B. Linking theory, research, and practice. In: Glanz K, Lewis F, Rimer B, eds. Health behavior and health education: theory, research and practice. 2nd edn. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1999.Google Scholar
- 9.Prochaska JO, Norcross JC, DiClemente CC. Changing for good. New York: Morrow; 1994.Google Scholar
- 10.DiClemente CC, Scott CW. Stages of change: interaction with treatment compliance and involvement. In: Onken L, Blaine J, Boren J, eds. Beyond the therapeutic alliance: keeping the drug-dependent individual in treatment. NIDA research monograph series (no. 165). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1997:131–156.Google Scholar
- 22.Bentler PM. EQS 6 structural equations program manual. Encino: Multivariate Software; 2006.Google Scholar
- 28.Velasquez MM, Maurer GG, Crouch C, et al. Group treatment for substance abuse: a stages of change therapy manual. New York: Guildford; 2001.Google Scholar
- 29.Evans E, Longshore D. Evaluation of the substance abuse and crime prevention act: treatment clients and program types during the first year of implementation. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 2004;(Suppl. 2):165–174, May.Google Scholar